Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2016, 64(6), 1971-1979 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201664061971

Identification of Factors Associated with Leadership-style Efficiency of Managers

Ladislava Kuchynková
Masaryk University, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Department of Corporate Economy, Lipová 41a, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic

The position of a manager is always associated with the need for efficient management of subordinates. Successful managers lead their subordinates efficiently due to the fact that they can properly diagnose competence of subordinates for the desired performance. In this context, it can be assumed that in the case of these managers there are factors that can positively affect their ability to successfully identify the appropriate leadership style. The ambition of this paper is to identify just such factors based on the analysis of data obtained from primary research on a sample of 149 respondents. The analysis included five factors that showed a premise that they could have an impact on the efficiency of the leadership style of managers: sex, the level of management, management area, the nature of the economic activity of an organization, and the number of direct subordinates. The major finding of the testing is the proved significant correlation between the level of management of a manager and the efficiency of their management style.

Keywords: leadership style, efficiency of leadership style, situational leadership style, preparedness level, directing, coaching, supporting, delegating

Prepublished online: December 21, 2016; Published: January 1, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kuchynková, L. (2016). Identification of Factors Associated with Leadership-style Efficiency of Managers. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis64(6), 1971-1979. doi: 10.11118/actaun201664061971
Download citation

References

  1. ANDERSON, L. K. 1995. An Investigation of School Administrator Personality Type and Gender to Leader Effectiveness, Flexibility and Years of Experience. Doctoral Dissertation. Denton, TX: University of North Texas.
  2. AVERY, G. 2001. Situational leadership preferences in Australia: congruity, flexibility and effectiveness. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 22(1): 11-21 Go to original source...
  3. BARTOŠOVÁ, M. 2007. Participácia mužov a žien v rozhodovacích poziciach. Záverečná správa. Bratislava: Inštitút pre výskum práce a rodiny.
  4. BATEMAN, T. S. and SNELL, S. 2004. Management: The New Competetive Landscape. USA: Mcgraw-Hill.
  5. BURRELL, D. N. et al. 2010. An Analysis of the Application of Situational Leadership in the Post 9/11 Evolving Public Health Managerial Environments. Leadership journal, 5(1): 49-59.
  6. HERSEY, P., BLANCHARD, K. H., JOHNSON, D. E. 2008. Management of Organizational Behavior: Leading Human Resources. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  7. DONNELLY, J. H., GIBSON, J. L., IVANCEVICH, J. M. 1997. Management. Praha: Grada Publishing, a.s.
  8. DRUCKER, P. F. 2006. The Effective Executive. New York: Harper Paperbacks.
  9. HAMBLETON, R. K. and GUMPERT, R. 1982. The validity of Hersey and Blanchard's theory of leader effectiveness. Group and Organization Studies, 7(2): 225 - 242. DOI: 10.1177/105960118200700210 Go to original source...
  10. HERSEY, P. and BLANCHARD, K. H. 1969. Life cycle theory of leadership. Training and Development Journal, 23(5): 26-34.
  11. HERSEY, P.,BLANCHARD, K. H. and JOHNSON, D. E. 2008. Management of Organizational Behavior: Leading Human Resources. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  12. CHEMERS, M. 1997. An Integrative Theory of Leadership. London: Psychology Press.
  13. LACOURSIERE, R. B. 1980. The life cycle of groups. New York: Human Sciences Press, 27-37.
  14. MANN HYUNG, H. 2008. Exploring differences in leadership styles: A study of manager tasks, follower characteristics, and task environments in Korean human service organizations. Social Bahvior and Personality, 36(3): 359-372. Go to original source...
  15. MONTGOMERY, D. C., BLODGET, J. G. and BARNES, J. H. 1996. A model of financial securities salespersons' job stress. The Journal of Services Marketing, 10(3): 21 - 38. DOI: 10.1108/08876049610119776 Go to original source...
  16. MURPHY, E.F. 1994. Military Organizational Culture: An Investigation of the Sex and Gender Differences in the Values, Sex Role Stereotype Attitudes, and Situational Leadership® II Behaviors of Air Force Middle-Level Managers. Doctoral Dissertation. Lafayette, LA: Nova Southeastern University.
  17. PIERCE, J. L. and NEWSTROM, J. W. 2003. Leaders and the Leadership Style. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  18. SILVERTHORNE, C. and WANG, T. H. 2001. Situational leadership style as a predictor of success and productivity among Taiwanese business organizations. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 135(4): 399-412. Go to original source...
  19. TANNENBAUM, A. S. and SCHMIDT, W. H. 1958. How to choose a leadership pattern. Harvard Business Review, 36: 95-102.
  20. TANNENBAUM, A. S. and SCHMIDT, W. H. 1973. How to choose a leadership pattern. Harvard Business Review, 53(3): 162-180.
  21. WATKINS, D. 2001. Situational Leadership Model. Center for Leadership Studies, [Online]. Available at: http://www.freequality.org/documents/knowledge/Situational%20Leadership%202.pdf. [Accessed: 2011, August 6].
  22. WHEELAN, S. A. 1990. Facilitating Training Groups: A Guide to Leadership and Verbal Intervention Skills. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Publishing Group.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.