Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2016, 64(4), 1337-1344 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201664041337
Public Awareness of the Relation between Nature-friendly Watercourse Modifications and Recreation in Cities
- 1 Department of Environmentalistic and Natural Resouces, Faculty of Regional Development and International Studies, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
- 2 Department of Applied Statistics and Demography, Faculty of Regional Development and International Studies, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
The aim of the article is to present the results of a method of public preferences - a questionnaire survey finding an awareness of the relation between the modifications of watercourses and recreation in urban environment. The aquatic ecosystem and the water itself in a landscape are regarded by citizens as a mere source of energy, food, and water used for industry or as a means of transport. However, water elements along with the flora and fauna belonging to this living ecosystem provide a plethora of opportunities for a development of e.g. recreation, tourism, even an entire region. The questionnaire method used has been applied in selected cities in the Czech Republic, e.g. in Frýdek-Místek, Olomouc, Vlašim, Benátky nad Jizerou and others. The criterion for selecting the cities has mostly been the construction of nature-friendly modifications to watercourse while seeking to increase the recreational potential of the area. The outcome of this article is to present the original results of the public survey which have subsequently served for a further processing of drafts and measures for recreational potential in the selected locations. The most important finding of this research was the minimum level of selected site citizens' awareness of revitalization and flood modifications, projects that were realized on watercourses in the cities.
Keywords: rivers in the cities, recreational use, survey
Grants and funding:
This article was prepared within the project IGA FRDIS Mendel University in Brno 8/2015 "Relationship revitalization of watercourses and recreation in the landscape".
Prepublished online: August 30, 2016; Published: September 1, 2016 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- ABERG, E. and TAPSELL, U. S. 2013. Revisiting the River Skerne: The long-term social benefits of river rehabilitation. Landscape and Urban Planning 113: 94-103. Science Direct [online]. Accessible at: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0169204613000169. [Accessed 2015, November 16].
Go to original source...
- ALAM, K 2011. Public attitudes toward restoration of impaired river ecosystems: Does residents' attachment to place matter? [Online]. Urban Ecosystems, 14(4): 635-653. ISSN 1083-8155. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11252-011-0176-5 http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2007.00244.x. [Accessed: 2016-02-28]. DOI: 10.1007/s11252-011-0176-5
Go to original source...
- BRAUMAN, K. A. and DAILY, G. C. 2008. Encyklopedia of Ecology. 1st Edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
- BUDÍKOVÁ, M., LERCH, T. and MIKOLÁŠ, Š. 2005. Basic statistical methods. [in Czech: Základní statistické metody]. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
- DEMEK, J., MACKOVIČIN, P. and SLAVÍK, P. 2013. Ecosystem services valleys and riverine floodplains and their changes [in Czech: Ekosystémové služby údolních a poříčních niv a jejich změny]. In: Fyziogeografický sborník 11. Brno, 6-7 February. Brno: Masaryk university, 27 - 34.
- EDEN, S. and TUNSTAL, S. 2006. Ecological versus social restoration? How urban river restoration challenges but also fails to challenge the science - policy nexus in the United Kingdom: Which actors should be involved in the decision making for river restorations? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 24(5): 661-680. Sage Journals [online]. Available at: http://epc.sagepub.com/lookup/doi/10.1068/c0608j.[Accessed 2015, November 16]. DOI: 10.1068/c0608j
Go to original source...
- GARETT, W. 2012. A city and its River: An Urban Political ekology of the loop and bridgeport in Chicago. [Online]. Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College. Accessible at: http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-04252012-112642/unrestricted/Wolf_thesis.pdf. [Accessed 2015, November 16].
- GHERMANDI, A., NUNES P. A. L. D., PORTELA R., et. al. 2011. Recreational, cultural, and aesthetic services from estuarine and coastal ecosystems. Treatise on Estuarine and Coastal Science, 12: 217-237. Science Direct [Online]. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123747112012122. [Accessed 2015, November 16]. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-374711-2.01212-2
Go to original source...
- GOBSTER, P. H., and WESTPHAL, L. M. 1998. People and the River: Perception and Use of Chicago Waterways for Recreation. Chicago: North Central Research Station.
- HRADILOVÁ, I. 2012. Influence of urban waterfront appearance on public space functions. [Online]. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 60(8): 261-268. Available at: http://acta.mendelu.cz/media/pdf/actaun_2012060080261.pdf. [Accessed 2015, November 17]. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201260080261
Go to original source...
- JUNKER, B., BUCHECKER, M. and MÜLLER-BÖKER, U. 2006. Objectives of public participation: Which actors should be involved in the decision making for river restorations? Water resources research, 43(10): article ID W10438. Wiley Online Library [Online]. Accessible at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2006WR005584/pdf.[Accessed 2015, November 16].
Go to original source...
- KONVIČKA, M. 2002. City and flood: Urban development strategy after thel flood [in Czech: Město a povodeň: Strategie rozvoje měst po povodni]. 1st Edition. Brno: ERA group.
- LEŽATKA, L. 2010. The importance and role of the artificial watercourses in the contemporary city [in Czech: Význam a úloha umělých vodních toků v soudobém městě]. 1st Edition. Brno: University of technology.
- POLIZZI, C., SIMONETTO, M., BARAUSSE, A., et al. 2015. Is ecosystem restoration worth the effort? The rehabilitation of a Finnish river affects recreational ecosystem services. Ecosystem services 14(12):158-169. Science direct [Online]. Accessible at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041615000029. [Accessed 2015, November 17]. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.01.001
Go to original source...
- WESTLING, E., L., SURRIDGE B., W., J., SHARP L., et al. 2014. Making sense of landscape change: Long-term perceptions among local residents following river restoration. Journal of hydrology. 519(10): 2613 - 2623. Science Direct [Online]. Accessible at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169414007112. [Accessed 2015, November 17]. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.09.029
Go to original source...
- WITTMANN, M. 2008. The phenomenon of water element with context of the development of contemporary cities [in Czech: Fenomén vodního prvku v kontextu rozvoje současných měst]. 1st Edition. Brno: VUT, Fakulta architektury.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.