Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2016, 64(4), 1125-1130 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201664041125

The Effect of the Season on the Behavior and Milk Yield of the Czech Fleckvieh Cows

Tomáš Černý, Milan Večeřa, Daniel Falta, Gustav Chládek
Department of Animal Breeding, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, 613 00 Brno, Zemědělská 1, Czech Republic

The aim of this study was to evaluate the seasonal behavior and milk yield of dairy cows of Czech Fleckvieh cattle. The subject of the monitoring was one section (housed in one quarter of barn) with 103 free cubicle beds with an average of 95 lactating dairy cows of Czech Fleckvieh cattle. In the seasons (spring, summer, autumn, winter) temperature (°C), relative humidity (%) and temperature-humidity index (THI) were monitored. Furthermore, behavioral signs were also observed (a total of 4,940 observations): dairy cows were either lying down (3,432 observations) or standing up (1,508 observations). In the conditions that dairy cows were standing up in the cubicle, up to 585 observations were proved. If dairy cows were standing up outside of the cubicle (923 observations), they were either lying on the left side (1,924 observations) or right side (1,508). Significant seasonal influence was found out (p < 0.05) on the number of dairy cows standing up (a maximum of 410 observations in the spring, a minimum of 342 observations in the summer) and then the number of cows lying both on the left (a maximum of 519 observations in the autumn and a minimum of 444 observations in the spring) and on the right side (a maximum of 415 observations in the winter, a minimum of 320 observations in the autumn). The seasonal influence was no significant (p > 0.05) in the remaining behavioral signs. With regard to milk yield, a significant seasonal influence was proved. The highest milk yield was reached with dairy cows in spring (29.27 kg of milk) and the lowest in the autumn (24.58 kg of milk). No significant differences of milk yield were detected between behavioral signs (p > 0.05). The maximum difference of milk yield was found out up to 1.39 kg between dairy cows lying down on the left side (28.35 kg) and the dairy cows standing up in a cubicle (26.96 kg) in the winter but even this difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).

Keywords: season, milk yield, Czech Fleckvieh cattle, behavior

Prepublished online: August 30, 2016; Published: September 1, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Černý, T., Večeřa, M., Falta, D., & Chládek, G. (2016). The Effect of the Season on the Behavior and Milk Yield of the Czech Fleckvieh Cows. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 64(4), 1125-1130. doi: 10.11118/actaun201664041125
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. BÍLEK, M. 2002. Welfare ve stájích pro skot. Praha: Ústav zemědělských a potravinářských informací.
    2. BOUŠKA, J. et al. 2006. Chov dojeného skotu. Praha: Profi Press.
    3. DOLEJŠ, J., TOUFAR, O., KNÍŽEK, J. 2002. Změna produkčních a etologických charakteristik při tepelném stresu dojnic. Farmář, 9: 44 - 45.
    4. DOLEJŠ, J. et al. 2004. Účinnost ochlazování dojnic při tepelném stresu. Náš Chov, 9: 32 - 34.
    5. DOLEŽAL, O., KNÍŽKOVÁ, I., KUDRNA, V., DOLEJŠ, J., KUNC, P., GREGORIADESOVÁ, J., ČERNÁ, D. 2004. Tepelný stres u skotu - taktika a strategie chovu. Praha: VÚŽV Uhříněves.
    6. DOLEŽAL, O. 2010. Metody eliminace tepelného stresu - významná chovatelská rezerva. Praha.
    7. DRAGOVICH, D. 1980. Effect of low winter temperatures on milk production of dairy cows grazed on farms in a warm temperate climate (Australia). Int. J. Biometeor., 24(2): 167 - 173. DOI: 10.1007/BF02253805 Go to original source...
    8. ERBEZ, M., BOE, K. E., FALTA, D., CHLÁDEK, G. 2012. Crowding of dairy cows in a cubicle barn during the hot summer months. Archiv fur Tierzucht-Archives of Animal Breeding, 55: 325-331. DOI: 10.5194/aab-55-325-2012 Go to original source...
    9. FRYČ, J. 2002. Větrání v objektech pro dojnice. Farmář, 3: 76 - 77. Go to original source...
    10. HAHN, G. L. 1999. Dynamic responses of cattle to thermal heat loads. Journal of Animal Science, 77(Suppl. 2/J): 10 - 20. DOI: 10.2527/1997.77suppl_210x Go to original source...
    11. KENDALL, P. E., NIELSEN, P. P., WEBSTER, J. R., VERKERK, G. A., LITTLEJOHN, R. P., MATTHEWS, L. R. 2006. The effects of providing shade to lactating dairy cows in temperature climate. Livestock Science, 103: 148 - 157. DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2006.02.004 Go to original source...
    12. KNÍŽKOVÁ, I. 2005. Využívání rezerv při intenzivním odchovu telat a jalovic. Praha: VÚŽV.
    13. KOUKAL, P. 2001. Výživa dojnic v teplém počasí podle zkušenosti z léta 2000. Farmář, 9: 75 - 76.
    14. KURSA, J., JÍLEK, F., VÍTOVEC, J., RAJMON, R. 1998. Zoohygiena a prevence chorob hospodářských zvířat. JU v Českých Budějovicích - ZF a ČZU Praha - agronomická fakulta.
    15. LOUDA, F., STÁDNÍK, L., JEŽKOVÁ, A., MIKŠÍK, J., PŘIBIL, J. 1999. Chov skotu (přednášky). 1. vyd. Praha: Česká zemědělská univerzita.
    16. O'DRISCOLL, K., BOYLE, L., HANLON, A. 2009. The effect of breed and housing system on dairy cow feeding and lying behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 116: 156 - 162. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.08.003 Go to original source...
    17. PENNINGTON, J. A., VAN DEVENDER, K. 2006. Heat Stress in Dairy Cattle. [Online]. Available at: http://www.uaex.edu/Other_Areas/publications/PDF/FSA-3040.pdf. [Cit. 2011-07-20].
    18. RICHTER, W. 1983. Zdraví zvířat, základní veterinární a chovatelské údaje. Praha: Státní zemědělské nakladatelství.
    19. SILANIKOVE, N. 2000. Effects of heat stress on the welfare of extensively managed domestic ruminants. Livestock Production Science, 67: 1 - 18. DOI: 10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00162-7 Go to original source...
    20. ŠOCH, M., BASÍK, M., NOVÁK, P., VRÁBLÍKOVÁ, J. 2003. Vliv relativní vlhkosti vzduchu a ochlazovací hodnoty prostředí na mléčnou produkci krav. In: Sborník z mezinárodní bioklimatické konference "Functions of energy and water balances in bioclimatological systems". Bratislava.
    21. TOUFAR, O., DOLEJŠ, J. 1996. Odraz vlivu extrémních stájových teplot na užitkovosti dojnic chovaných v uzavřené stáji. In: Aktuální otázky bioklimatologie zvířat. Brno: NOEL, 60 - 62.
    22. VEČEŘA, M., FALTA, D., CHLÁDEK, G., MÁCHAL, L. 2012. The effect of low and high barn temperatures on behaviour and performance od Holstein dairy cows. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 60(6): 343 - 350. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201260060343 Go to original source...
    23. VOIGT, Y., GEORG, H., JAHN-FALK, D. 2007. Evaluation of the preference for different free-stall bedding systems by dairy cows under field conditions. Tieraerztliche Umschau, 62(10): 531 - 536.
    24. VOKŘÁLOVÁ, J., NOVÁK, P., DVOŘÁNKOVÁ, J., KNÍŽKOVÁ, I., KUNC, P. 2007. Chladový stres u dojnic. In: Aktuální otázky bioklimatologie zvířat. Praha, 101 - 103.
    25. WEST, J. W. 2003. Effects of Heat-Stress on Production in Dairy Cattle. J. Dairy Sci., 86: 2131 - 2144. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73803-X Go to original source...
    26. ZEJDOVÁ, P., FALTA, D., CHLÁDEK, G., MÁCHAL, L. 2011. Effect of lactation stage, its number, current milk performance and barn air temperature on laterality of holstein dairy cows laying behaviour. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 59(5): 315 - 321. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201159050315 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content