Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2016, 64(3), 813-819 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201664030813

The Importance of Cultivated Plants in the Diet of Red and Roe Deer and Mouflon

Jiří Kamler1, Miloslav Homolka2
1 Department of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
2 Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 603 65 Brno, Czech Republic

The botanical composition of red and roe deer and mouflon diet was studied in the mosaic landscape in Drahanská vrchovina highlands, Czech Republic. We focused on the proportion and quality of agricultural crops and natural forest plants and estimated quality of the herbivore diet. Diet quality was monitored by the near infrared reflectance spectroscopy on the basis of nutritional quality of diet items. Red deer, roe deer and mouflon ingested all cultivated plants growing close to forest. However, the proportion of cultivated plants varied between seasons and herbivore species. The peak of crops consumption occurred in summer - when cereals spikes were ripe. The average proportion of corn for red deer was 40%. Cultivated plants were well accessible for herbivores in the study area and during vegetation period formed an important part of their diet, but the importance of cultivated plants for herbivores was lower compared with natural food resources present in forests during vegetation period. Although the main natural food sources had lower nutritional value, they formed the main part of herbivore diet in the study area. The availability of cultivated plants increases the quality of food supply during the growing season, but for herbivores the natural food sources are crucial, forming the main part of their diet both in summer and in winter. Wildlife management should reckon with feeding preferences of herbivores.

Keywords: agricultural crops, deer, diet quality, diet composition
Grants and funding:

This study was supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic, Grant No. 206/03/P134.

Prepublished online: July 4, 2016; Published: July 1, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kamler, J., & Homolka, M. (2016). The Importance of Cultivated Plants in the Diet of Red and Roe Deer and Mouflon. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 64(3), 813-819. doi: 10.11118/actaun201664030813
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. ARNOLD, W., RUF, T., REIMOSER, S., TATARUCH, F., ONDERSCHEKA, K. and SCHOBER, F. 2004. Nocturnal hypometabolism as an overwintering strategy of red deer (Cervus elaphus). American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 286(1): 174-181. DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00593.2002 Go to original source...
    2. BARANČEKOVÁ, M. 2004. The roe deer diet: Is floodplain forest optimal habitat? Folia Zoologica, 53(3): 285-292.
    3. BRINKMAN, T. J., DEPERNO, C. S., JENKS, J. A., HAROLDSON, B. S. and OSBORN, R. G. 2005. Movement of female white-tailed deer: Effects of climate and intensive row-crop agriculture. Journal of Wildlife Management, 69(3): 1099-1111. DOI: 10.2193/0022-541X(2005)069[1099:MOFWDE]2.0.CO;2 Go to original source...
    4. DAI, Q., GU, H.-J., WANG, Y.-Z. 2007. Theories and models for habitat selection. Zoological Research, 28(6): 681-689.
    5. DUMONT, B., RENAUD, P. C., MORELLET, N., MALLET, C., ANGLARD, F., VERHEYDEN-TIXIER, H. 2005. Seasonal variations of Red Deer selectivity on a mixed forest edge. Animal Research, 54(5): 369-381. DOI: 10.1051/animres:2005030 Go to original source...
    6. HEWITT, D. G. 2011. Nutrition. Biology and Management of White-Tailed Deer, 75-105. Go to original source...
    7. HOMOLKA, M. and HEROLDOVÁ, M. 1990. Vegetation as the food supply for game in a forest near Hostěnice. Acta Sc. Nat. Brno, 24(11): 1-40.
    8. CORNELIS, J., CASAER, J. and HERMY, M. 1999. Impact of season, habitat and research techniques on diet composition of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): a review. Journal of Zoology, 248(2): 195-207. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1999.tb01196.x Go to original source...
    9. JIANG, G. S., MA, J. Z., ZHANG, M. H. 2006. Spatial distribution of ungulate responses to habitat factors in Wandashan forest region, northeastern China. Journal of Wildlife Management, 70(5): 1470-1476. Go to original source...
    10. JOHNSON, C. J., PARKER, K. L. and HEARD, D. C. 2001. Foraging across a variable landscape: behavioral decisions made by woodland caribou at multiple spatial scales. Oecologia, 127(4): 590-602. DOI: 10.1007/s004420000573 Go to original source...
    11. KAMLER, J. and HOMOLKA, M. 2005. Faecal nitrogen: a potential indicator of red and roe deer diet quality in forest habitats. Folia Zoologica, 54: 89-98.
    12. KAMLER, J. and HOMOLKA, M. 2011. Needles in faeces: an index of quality of wild ungulate winter diet. Folia Zoologica, 60(1): 63-69. DOI: 10.25225/fozo.v60.i1.a10.2011 Go to original source...
    13. KATONA, K., GAL-BELTEKI, A., TERHES, A., BARTUCZ, K., SZEMETHY, L. 2014. How important is supplementary feed in the winter diet of red deer? A test in Hungary. Wildlife Biology, 20(6): 326-334. DOI: 10.2981/wlb.00053 Go to original source...
    14. KJOSTVEDT, J. H., MYSTERUD, A. and OSTBYE, E. 1998. Roe deer Capreolus capreolus use of agricultural crops dutiny winter in the Lier valley, Norway. Wildlife biology, 4: 23-31. DOI: 10.2981/wlb.1998.012 Go to original source...
    15. KLEINEBECKER, T., KLAUS, V. H., HOLZEN, N. 2011. Reducing sample quantity and maintaining high prediction quality of grassland biomass properties with near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy, 19(6): 495-505. DOI: 10.1255/jnirs.957 Go to original source...
    16. KOUBEK, P. and HRABĚ, V. 1996. Home range dynamics on the red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a mountain forest in central Europe. Folia Zoologica, 45(3): 219-222.
    17. LASHLEY, M. A., CHITWOOD, M. C., HARPER, C. A., MOORMAN, C. E., DEPERNO, C. S. 2015. Poor soil and density-mediated body weight in deer: forage quality or quantity? Wildlife Biology, 21(4): 213-219. DOI: 10.2981/wlb.00073 Go to original source...
    18. POPOVIC, Z., DORDEVIC, N., DORDEVIC, M., GRUBIC, G., STOJANOVIC, B. 2009. Estimation of the quality of the nutrition of roe deer based on chemical composition of the rumen content. Acta Veterinaria-Beograd, 59(5-6): 653-663. Go to original source...
    19. MATRAI, K., SZEMETHY, L., TOTH, L., KANTONA, K. and SZEKELY, J. 2004. Resource use by red deer in lowland nonnative forests. Journal of Wildlife Management, 68(4): 879-888. DOI: 10.2193/0022-541X(2004)068[0879:RUBRDI]2.0.CO;2 Go to original source...
    20. MONTEITH, K. B., MONTEITH, K. L., BOWYER, R. T., LESLIE, D. M., JENKS, J. A. 2014. Reproductive effects on fecal nitrogen as an index of diet quality: an experimental assessment. Journal of Mammalogy, 95(2): 301-310. DOI: 10.1644/12-MAMM-A-306.1 Go to original source...
    21. MUŠKA, F. 2007. Damage of sugar beet caused by wild animals in the Czech Republic - historical survey to 2005. Listy cukrovarnické a řepařské, 123(2): 54-56.
    22. MYSTERUD, A., YOCCOZ, N. G., STENSETH, N. C., LANGVATN, R. 2000. Retalionships between sex ratio, climate and density in red deer: the importance of spatial scale. Journal of Animal ecology, 69(6): 959-974. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00454.x Go to original source...
    23. OSBORN, R. G. and JENKS, J. A. 1998. Assessing dietary quality of white-tailed deer using fecal indices: effects of supplemental feeding and area. Journal of Mammalogy, 79: 437-447. DOI: 10.2307/1382974 Go to original source...
    24. SHENK, J. S. and WESTERHAUS, M. O. 1991. Population structuring of near-infrared spectra and modified partial least-squares regression. Crop Sci., 31: 1548-1555. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183X003100060034x Go to original source...
    25. SMOLINSKI, A., WALCZAK, B., EINAX, J. M. 2003. Robust multivariate calibration in environmental studies. Analytical Letters, 36(10): 2317-2336. DOI: 10.1081/AL-120023722 Go to original source...
    26. SOMMER, A. 1994: Nutrient need and tables of nutrient value of the feedstuff for ruminants (in Czech). Pohořelice: VÚVZ Pohořelice.
    27. SZEMETHY, L., MATRAI, K., BIRO, Z. and KANTONA, K. 2003a. Seasonal home range shift of red deer in a forest-agriculture area in southern Hungary. Acta Theriologica, 48(4): 547-556. DOI: 10.1007/BF03192500 Go to original source...
    28. SZEMETHY, L., MATRAI, K., KANTONA, K. and OROSZ, S. 2003b. Seasonal home range shift of red deer hinds, Cervus elaphus: are there feeding reasons? Folia Zoologica, 52(3): 249-258.
    29. THIRGOOD, S. J. 1995. The effects of sex season and habitat availability on patterns of habitat use by fallow deer (Dama dama). Journal of Zoology, 235: 645-659. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1995.tb01775.x Go to original source...
    30. TEITELBAUM, C. S., FAGAN, W. F., GLEMING, C. H., DRESSLER, G., CALABRESE, J. M., LEIMGRUBER, P., MUELLER, T. 2015. How far to go? Determinants of migration distance in land mammals. Ecology Letters, 18(6): 545-552. DOI: 10.1111/ele.12435 Go to original source...
    31. WELCH, D., STAINES, B. W., CATT, D. C. and SCOTT, D. 1990. Habitat use by red (Cervus elaphus) and roe (Capreolus capreolus) deer in a Scottish Sitka spruce plantation. Journal of Zoology, 221: 453-476. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1990.tb04013.x Go to original source...
    32. WESTOBY, M. 1974. An analysis of diet selection by large generalist herbivores. American Naturalist, 108: 290-304. DOI: 10.1086/282908 Go to original source...
    33. XICCATO, G., TROCINO, A., CARAZZOLO, A., MEURENS, M., MAERTENS, L. and CARABANO, R. 1999. Nutritive evaluation and ingredient prediction of compound feeds for rabbits by near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS). Animal Feed Science and Technology, 77: 201-212. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-8401(98)00253-3 Go to original source...
    34. ZEJDA, J. and BAUEROVÁ, Z. 1985. Home range of field roe deer. Acta Sc. Nat. Brno, 19: 1-43.
    35. ZEJDA, J. 1978. Field groupings of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in a lowland region. Folia Zoologica, 27: 111-122.
    36. ZEJDA, J., ŘEBÍČKOVÁ, M. and HOMOLKA, M. 1985. Study of behaviour in field roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Acta Sc. Nat. Brno, 19(12): 1-37.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content