Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2016, 64(2), 635-642 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201664020635

Economic Multipliers and Sectoral Linkages: Ghana and the New Oil Sector

Dennis Nchor, Tomáš Konderla
Department of Statistics and Operations Analysis, Faculty of Business Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

The study seeks to assess the structure of the economy of Ghana in terms of changes in the economic structure before and after the production of oil in commercial quantities. This is viewed with regards to economic multipliers, sectoral interdependence and trade concentration. The results show that changes occurred with regards to multipliers and sectoral interdependence. The output multipliers of most sectors have declined. The results also show that the agricultural sector experienced an initial decline in its growth while industry experienced an increase. The performance of the services sector was relatively stable for the period covered by the study. There is a decline in the level of trade concentration though on a whole the concentration index is still high. The study employed input-output modeling techniques and the data was obtained from the Ghana statistical service and the World Development Indicators.

Keywords: oil and gas, multipliers, sectoral linkages, trade concentration, input ratios, input-output table, Ghana

Prepublished online: May 4, 2016; Published: May 1, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Nchor, D., & Konderla, T. (2016). Economic Multipliers and Sectoral Linkages: Ghana and the New Oil Sector. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis64(2), 635-642. doi: 10.11118/actaun201664020635
Download citation

References

  1. AROCA, P. 2001. Impacts and Development in Local Economies Based On Mining: Chilean II Region. [Online]. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420701000137.
  2. CIARRETA, A., NASIROV, S. 2012. Development Trends in the Azerbaijan Oil and Gas Sector: Achievements and Challenges. Energy Policy, 40: 282-292. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.10.002 Go to original source...
  3. D'HERNONCOURT, J., CORDIER, M., HADLEY, D. 2011. Input-Output Multipliers Specification Sheet and Supporting Material. Spicosa Project Report. Brussels: Université Libre de Bruxelles - CEESE.
  4. KARKACIER, O., GOKTOLGA, G. 2005. Input-Output Analysis of Energy Use in Agriculture. Energy Conversion and Management, 46: 1513-1521. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2004.07.011 Go to original source...
  5. KAZEMIER, B. 2012. From Input-Output Tables to Supply and Use Tables. Economic Systems Research, 24(3): 1-9. DOI: 10.1080/09535314.2011.650627 Go to original source...
  6. KEYNES, J. M. 1936. The general theory of employment, interest and Money. London: Macmillan.
  7. KWAK, N., WILLIAMS, A., WANG, X., LEE, H. 2005. Talking Politics and Engaging Politics: An Examination of the Interactive Relationships between Structural Features of Political Talk and Discussion Engagement. Communication Research, 32: 87-111. DOI: 10.1177/0093650204271400 Go to original source...
  8. LENZEN, M. 2001. A Generalised Input-Output Multiplier Calculus for Australia. Economic Systems Research, 13: 65-92. DOI: 10.1080/09535310120026256 Go to original source...
  9. LEONTIEF, W. 1936. Quantitative Input and Output Relations in the Economic System of the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics, 18: 105-125. DOI: 10.2307/1927837 Go to original source...
  10. MILLER, R., BLAIR, P. 2009. Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. 2nd edition. Go to original source...
  11. MILLER, R., BLAIR, P. 1985. Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  12. NEUMANN, J. V. 1945. A Model of General Economic Equilibrium. Review of Economic Studies, 13(1): 1-9. DOI: 10.2307/2296111 Go to original source...
  13. RAYNER, V., BISHOP, J. 2013. Industry Dimension of the Resource Boom: An Input-Output Analysis. Research discussion paper.
  14. SABIROGLU, I. M., BASHIRLI, S. 2012. Input-Output Analysis In an Oil-Rich Economy: The Case Of Azerbaijan. Resources Policy, 37: 73-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2011.12.003 Go to original source...
  15. SAN CRISTO' BALA, J. R., BIEZMA, M. V. 2006. The Mining Industry in the European Union: Analysis of Inter-Industry Linkages Using Input-Output Analysis. Resources Policy, 31(1): 1-6. DOI: 10.1016. DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2006.03.004 Go to original source...
  16. SOKLIS, G. 2009. The Conversion of Supply and Use Tables to Symmetric Input-Output Tables: A Critical Review. Bulletin of Political Economy, 3(1): 51-70.
  17. SRAFFA, P. 1960. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities: Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  18. STILWELL, L. C. et al. 2000. An Input-Output Analysis of The Impact Of Mining On The South African Economy. Resources Policy, 26: 17-30. DOI: 10.1016/S0301-4207(00)00013-1 Go to original source...
  19. TESAFA, F. 2014. Forward and Backward Linkage Analysis of Manufacturing Industries in Amhara Region, Ethiopia. National Monthly Refereed Journal of Research in Science & Technology, 3(2): 14-26.
  20. WANG, L., XIE, R., JUN, L. 2013. Backward and Forward Linkages in Chinese Steel Industry Using Input Output Analysis. International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences, 2(2): 36-55. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-2473-3.ch008. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-2473-3.ch008 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.