Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2016, 64(2), 481-486 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201664020481
Analysis of Reproductive Parameters in Sows with Regard to Their Health Status
- 1 Department of Animal Breeding, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
- 2 Department of Animal Nutrition and Forage Production, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
The aim of the study was to evaluate selected reproductive parameters in sows. Observed parameters were analysed in two herds with different health status. The experiment involved 160 hybrid sows from the 1st to the 5th litter (80 sows with health status A and 80 sows with health status B). Highly statistically significant differences (P ≤ 0.001) and significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) were found between the two groups in length of gravidity, total numbers of piglets, numbers of live-born piglets, numbers of stillborn piglets, numbers of reared piglets and losses of piglets per litter in favor of group B with declared health status. Evaluation of phenotypic correlation between the total number of piglets and the live-born piglets in the sows without declared health status revealed high positive correlation (P ≤ 0.01). Strong positive dependence was found also between the live-born and the reared piglets in this group. In the sows with declared health status, high positive correlation (P ≤ 0.01) was found also between the total number of piglets and the number of live-born piglets and between the number of live-born and reared piglets.
Keywords: sow, piglet, health, performance
Grants and funding:
This study was supported by the project of MENDELU internal grant agency, Faculty of Agriculture No. TP 2/2015 and the NAZV Project No. QI 111A166 of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic.
Prepublished online: May 4, 2016; Published: May 1, 2016 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- ANDERSEN, I. L., HAUKVIK, I. A. and BOE, K. E. 2009. Drying and warming immediately after birth may reduce piglet mortality in loose-housed sows. Animal, 3(4): 592-597. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731108003650
Go to original source...
- ARANGO, J., MISZTAL, I., TSURUTA, S., CULBERTSON, M., HOLL, J. W. and HERRING, W. 2006. Genetic study of individual preweaning mortality and birth weight in Large White piglets using threshold-linear models. Livest. Sci., 101(1-3): 208-218. DOI: 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.11.011
Go to original source...
- BOUDNÝ, J. and ŠPIČKA, J. 2012. The effect of production efficiency on economic results in pig breeding. Res. pig breeding, 6(1): 1-8.
- HOLTKAMP D. J., LIN, H., WANG, C. and O'CONNOR, A. M. 2012. Identifying questions in the American Association of Swine Veterinarian's PRRS risk assessment survey that are important for retrospectively classifying swine herds according to whether they reported clinical PRRS outbreaks in the previous 3 years. Prev. Vet. Med., 106(1): 42-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.03.003
Go to original source...
- HORKÝ, P. 2014. Influence of increased dietary selenium on glutathione peroxidase activity and glutathione concentration in erythrocytes of lactating sows. Ann. Anim. Scie., 14(4): 869-882. DOI: 10.2478/aoas-2014-0056
Go to original source...
- HORKÝ, P., JANČÍKOVÁ, P., SOCHOR, J., HYNEK, D., CHAVIS, G. J., RUTTKAY NEDECKÝ, B., CERNEI, N., ZÍTKA, O., ZEMAN, L., ADAM, V. and KIZEK, R. 2012. Effect of organic and inorganic form of selenium on antioxidant status of breeding boars ejaculate revealed by electrochemistry. Int. J. Electrochem. Sc., 7(10): 9643-9657.
Go to original source...
- HORKÝ, P., RUTTKAY-NEDECKÝ, B., KREMPLOVÁ, M., KRYŠTOFOVÁ, O., KENSOVÁ, R., HYNEK, D., BABULA, P., ZÍTKA, O., ZEMAN, L., ADAM, V. and KIZEK, R. 2013. Effect of different doses of organically bound selenium on antioxidant status and levels of metal ions in postpartum sows. Int. J. Electrochem. Sc., 8(5): 6162-6179.
Go to original source...
- JORSAL, S. E. and THOMSEN B. L. 1988. A cox regression analysis of risk factors related to Mycoplasma suipneumoniae reinfection in Danisch SPF-herds. Acta Vet. Scand., 84(1): 436-438.
- LAANEN, M., PERSSONS, D., RIBBENS, S., DE JONG, E., CALLENS, B., STRUBBE, M., MAES, D. and DEWULF, J. 2013. Relationship between biosecurity and production/antimicrobial treatment characteristics in pig herds. Vet. J., 198(1): 508-512. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.08.029
Go to original source...
- LAMBERT, M. Č., POLJAK, Z., ARSENAULT, J. and D'ALLAIRE, S. 2012. Epidemiological investigations in regard to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) in Quebec, Canada. Part 1: Biosecurity practices and their geographical distribution in two areas of different swine density. Prev. Vet. Med., 104(1-2): 74-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.12.004
Go to original source...
- LEWIS, C. R. G., TORREMORELL, M and BISHOP, S. C. 2009. Effects of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection on the performance of commercial sows and gilts of different parities and genetic lines. J. Swine Health Prod., 3(1): 140-147.
- MUNSTERHJELM, C., VALROS, A., HEINONEN, M., HALLI, O. and PELTONIEMI, O. A. T. 2006. Welfare index and reproductive performance in the sow. Reprod. Domest. Anim., 41(6): 494-500. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00700.x
Go to original source...
- NEVRKLA, P., ČECHOVÁ, M. and HADAŠ, Z. 2013. Evaluation of selected reproductive parametres in gilts and loss of piglets after repopulation. Acta univ. Agric. et silvic Mendel. Brun., 61(5): 1357-1364. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201361051357
Go to original source...
- NIELSENA, J., BØTNERA, A., BILLE-HANSENB, V., OLEKSIEWICZA, M. B. and STORGAARD, T. 2002. Experimental inoculation of late term pregnant sows with a field isolate of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome vaccine-derived virus. Vet. Microbiol., 84(1): 1-13. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1135(01)00450-3
Go to original source...
- OLANRATMANEE, E., KUNAVONGKRIT, A. and TUMMARUK, P. 2010. Impact of porcine epidemic diarrhea virus infection at different periods of pregnancy on subsequent reproductive performance in gilts and sows. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 122(1-2): 42-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.07.004
Go to original source...
- OLIVIERO, C., HEINONEN, M., VALROS, A. and PELTONIEMI, O. 2010. Environmental and sow-related factors affecting the duration of farrowing. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 119(1-4): 85-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.12.009
Go to original source...
- RODRÍGUEZ, S. V., PLÀ, L. M. and ALBORNOZ, V. M. 2012. Modeling tactical planning decisions through a linear optimization model in sow farms. Livest. Sci., 143(2-3): 162-171. DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2011.09.006
Go to original source...
- ROEHE, R. and KALM, E. 2000. Estimation of genetic and environmental risk factors associated with pre-weaning mortality in piglets using generalized linear mixed models. Anim. Sci., 70(2): 227-240. DOI: 10.1017/S1357729800054692
Go to original source...
- ROOTWELT, V., REKSEN, O. and FRAMSTAD, T. 2012. Production traits of litters in 2 crossbred Duroc pig lines. J. Anim. Sci., 90(1): 152-158. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2011-3851
Go to original source...
- RYDHMER, L., LUNDEHEIM, N. and CANARIO L. 2008. Genetic correlations between gestation length, piglet survival and early growth. Livest. Sci., 115: 287-293. DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2007.08.014
Go to original source...
- SMITH, A. L., STALDER, K. J., SERENIUS, T. V., BASS, T. J. and MABRY, J. W. 2008. Effect of weaning age on nursery pig and sow reproductive performance. J. Swine Health Prod., 16(3): 131-137.
- ŠKORJANC, G., BRUS, M. and POTOKAR, M. Č. 2007. Effect of Birth Weight and Sex on Pre-Weaning Growth Rate of Piglets. Arch. Tierzucht, 50(5): 476-486.
Go to original source...
- VAILLANCOURT, J. P., MARSH, W. E. and DIAL, G. D. 1992. Internal consistency of preweaning mortality datacollected by swine production. Prev. Vet. Med., 14(3-4): 115-128. DOI: 10.1016/0167-5877(92)90089-X
Go to original source...
- ZHAO, Z., QIN, Y., LAI, Z., PENG, L., CAI, X., WANG, L., GUO, X., YANG, H. 2012. Microbial ecology of swine farms and PRRS vaccine vaccination strategies. Vet. Microbiol., 155(2-4): 247-256. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.09.028
Go to original source...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.