Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2015, 63(6), 2145-2150 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201563062145

An Empirical Sector-Specific Gravity Model for Hungarian International Trade

Jana Šimáková, Daniel Stavárek
Department of Finance and Accounting, School of Business Administration in Karvina, Silesian University in Opava, Univerzitní náměstí 1934/3, 733 40 Karviná, Czech Republic

This paper contributes to the economic literature on the impact of exchange rate volatility on Hungary's foreign trade. Basic gravity model shows that trade volume between a pair of countries is an increasing function of their sizes (GDP) and a decreasing function of the distance between them. Additional factors included in extended model are population, dummy for common border and proxy for exchange rate volatility. The measure of exchange rate volatility is estimated by GARCH model. This paper explores relationship between trade and exchange rate uncertainty using quarterly data over the period 1999:1 - 2014:3. In order to obtain the objective result, we use the panel data regression for 10 sectors of Hungarian international trade based on SITC classification and six major trading partners (Austria, Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy and Poland). The significant parameters obtained from panel regression demonstrate that bilateral exchange rate volatility leads to a decrease in Hungary's foreign trade.

Keywords: exchange rate volatility, international trade, gravity model
Grants and funding:

Publication of this paper was supported by the Student Grant System of Silesian University [project SGS/7/2013].

Prepublished online: December 26, 2015; Published: January 1, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Šimáková, J., & Stavárek, D. (2015). An Empirical Sector-Specific Gravity Model for Hungarian International Trade. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis63(6), 2145-2150. doi: 10.11118/actaun201563062145
Download citation

References

  1. ARVAS, A. M. 2008. Does Real Exchange rate Matter for Emerging Markets' International Trade? A Gravity Model Approach for Turkey. In: Proceedings of First International Conference on Management and Economics. Tirana: Epoka University Research and Application Center, 77-96.
  2. AUBOIN, M. and RUTA, M. 2013. The Relationship between Exchange Rates and International Trade: A Literature Review. World Trade Review, 12(3): 577-605. DOI: 10.1017/S1474745613000025 Go to original source...
  3. BAHMANI-OSKOOEE, M. 1991. Is there a Long-Run Relation between the Trade Balance and the Real Effective Exchange Rate of LDCs? Economics Letters, 36(4): 403-407. DOI: 10.1016/0165-1765(91)90206-Z Go to original source...
  4. BAHMANI-OSKOOEE, M. and HAJILEE, M. 2013. Impact of Exchange-Rate Variability on Commodity Trade between U.S. and Germany. Empirica, 40(2): 287-324. DOI: 10.1007/s10663-012-9193-8 Go to original source...
  5. BAHMANI-OSKOOEE, M. HARVEY, H. and HEGERTY, S. W. 2013. Exchange-Rate Variability and U.S.-French Trade Flows: Evidence from Industry Data. Empirica, 40(4): 685-719. DOI: 10.1007/s10663-012-9206-7 Go to original source...
  6. BAILEY, M. J., TAVLAS, G. S. and ULAN, M. 1987. The Impact of Exchange Rate Volatility on Export Growth: Some Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Results. Journal of Policy Modeling, 9(1): 225-243. DOI: 10.1016/0161-8938(87)90010-X Go to original source...
  7. BALDWIN, R., SKUDELNY, F. and TAGLIONI, D. 2005. Trade Effects of the Euro, Evidence from Sectoral Data. Frankfurt am Main: European Central Bank. [Online]. Available at: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp446.pdf. [Accessed: 2014, February 1]. Go to original source...
  8. BERGSTRAND, J. H. 1989. The Generalized Gravity Equation, Monopolistic Competition, and the Factor-Proportions Theory in International Trade. Review of Economics and statistics, 71(1): 143-153. DOI: 10.2307/1928061 Go to original source...
  9. CHANEY, T. 2008. Distorted Gravity: The Intensive and Extensive Margins of International Trade. American Economic Review, 98: 1707-1721. DOI: 10.1257/aer.98.4.1707 Go to original source...
  10. CHOU, W. L. 2000. Exchange Rate Variability and China's Exports. Journal of Comparative Economics, 28(1): 61-79. DOI: 10.1006/jcec.1999.1625 Go to original source...
  11. CLARK, P. 1973. Uncertainty, Exchange Rate Risk, and the Level of International Trade. Western Economic Journal, 11(3): 302-313. Go to original source...
  12. DEARDORFF, A. V. 1998. Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassical World? In: FRANKEL, A. J. (eds.), The Regionalization of the World Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  13. ETHIER, W. 1998. Regionalism in a Multilateral World. Journal of Political Economy, 106: 1214-1245. DOI: 10.1086/250045 Go to original source...
  14. FOGARASI, J. 2011. The Effect of Exchange Rate Volatility upon Foreign Trade of Hungarian Agricultural Products. Studies in Agricultural Economics, 113: 85-96. DOI: 10.7896/j.1005 Go to original source...
  15. FRANKE, G. 1991. Exchange Rate Volatility and International Trading Strategy. Journal of International Money and Finance, 10(2): 292-307. DOI: 10.1016/0261-5606(91)90041-H Go to original source...
  16. GOTUR, P. 1985. Effects of Exchange Rate Volatility on Trade. IMF Staff Papers, 32: 475-512. DOI: 10.2307/3866807 Go to original source...
  17. HEAD, K. 2003. Gravity for Beginners. Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
  18. HELPMAN, E., MELITZ, M. J. and RUBINSTEIN, Y. 2008. Estimating Trade Flows: Trading Partners and Trading Volumes. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123: 441-487. DOI: 10.1162/qjec.2008.123.2.441 Go to original source...
  19. HOOPER, P. and KOHLHAGEN, S. 1978. The Effect of Exchange Rate Uncertainty on the Prices and Volume of International Trade. Journal of International Economics, 8(4): 483-511. DOI: 10.1016/0022-1996(87)90001-8 Go to original source...
  20. EATON, J. and KORTUM, S. 2002. Technology, Geography, and Trade. Econometrica, 70(5): 1741-1780. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0262.00352 Go to original source...
  21. LEAMER, E. E. and LEVINSOHN J. 1995. International Trade Theory: the Evidence. In: GROSSMAN, G. M. and ROGO, K. (eds.), Handbook of International Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V. Go to original source...
  22. LINNEMANN, H. 1966. An Econometric Study of International Trade Flows. Amsterdam: NorthHolland.
  23. MARTINEZ-ZARZOSO, I. 2003. Gravity model: An Application to Trade between Regional Blocs. Atlantic Economic Journal, 31(2): 174-187. DOI: 10.1007/BF02319869 Go to original source...
  24. OZTURK, I. 2006. Exchange Rate Volatility and Trade: A Literature Survey. International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies, 3(1): 85-102.
  25. OZTURK, I. and KALYONCU, H. 2009. Exchange Rate Volatility and Trade: An Empirical Investigation from Cross-country Comparison. African Development Review, 21(3): 499-513. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8268.2009.00220.x Go to original source...
  26. POSTENYI, A. 2014. Determinants of Foreign Trade of Hungary: Trade Theory and the Gravity Model. [Online]. Available at: http://doktori.econ.unideb.hu/download/pdf/kutatasiforum/2014jun/postenyi.andrea.pdf. [Accessed: 2015, January 6].
  27. PÖYHÖNEN, P. A. 1963. Tentative Model for the Volume of Trade between Countries. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 90: 93-100.
  28. RAJAN, R. 2004. Exchange Rate Volatility and Trade Flows - Some New Evidences. Washington D.C.: International Monetary Fund. [Online]. Available at: https://www.imf.org/external/np/res/exrate/2004/eng/051904.pdf. [Accessed: 2014, February 8]. Go to original source...
  29. SERCU, P. and VANHULLE, C. 1992. Exchange Rate Volatility, International Trade, and the Value of Exporting Firm. Journal of Banking and Finance, 16(1): 152-182. DOI: 10.1016/0378-4266(92)90083-C Go to original source...
  30. ŠIMÁKOVÁ, J. 2014. Vplyv kurzovej volatility na obchodné toky Maďarska. In: Hradecké ekonomické dny 2014. Hradec Králové: Gaudeamus, 234-240.
  31. TAGLIONI, D. 2002. Exchange Rate Volatility as a Barrier to Trade: New Methodologies and Recent Evidences. Economie Internationale, 89(90): 227-259. Go to original source...
  32. TICHÝ, F. 2007. Impact of Accession to EMU on International Trade - Case of the Czech Republic. Prague Economic Papers, 4: 336-346. DOI: 10.18267/j.pep.312 Go to original source...
  33. TINBERGEN, J. 1962. Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund.
  34. TOMANOVÁ, L. 2013. Volatility and the Foreign Trade in CEEC. In: Proceedings of the First International Congress on Economics. Ankara: Gazi University, 649-664.
  35. VIAENE, J. M. and VRIES, C. G. 1992. International Trade and Exchange Rate Volatility. European Economic Review, 36: 1311-1321. DOI: 10.1016/0014-2921(92)90035-U Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.