Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2015, 63(6), 1891-1895 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201563061891

Overcoming the Uncertainty in the Du-Pont Graph of Profitability

Jan Hron1, Tomáš Macák1, Pavel Andres2
1 Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 21 Praha 6, Czech Republic
2 Department of Engineering Pedagogy, Economics, Czech Technical University in Prague, The Masaryk Institute of Advanced Studies, Zikova 1903/4, 166 36 Praha 6, Czech Republic

Financial analysis of a company requires a wealth of information. There is so much information available and so much of the analysis can be computerized, that the task of the analyst is to select the appropriate tools, gather the pertinent information, and interpret the information. Analysis is becoming more important following the recent scandals as investors and financial managers are learning to become more sceptical of accounting information and look more closely at trends in data, comparisons with other firms, the relation between management compensation and earnings, and footnote disclosures.
One of the best tools for predicting profit from financial analysis is the use of Du-Pont graph of profitability. It sees a connection between profit and turnover of operating assets. Each company has, however, individual curve of this dependence, therefore, the determination of turnover for the planned profit vague matter (values create the array of values). The aim of this paper is to propose a method to resolve uncertainty in planning for asset turnover target profit. Will be used polynomial interpolation theory and posterior information.

Keywords: Du-Pont Graph of profitability, asset turnover, polynomial interpolation, posterior information
Grants and funding:

This research was supported by the Czech Science Foundation, and the paper was written under the framework of GACR project P403/12/1950.

Prepublished online: December 26, 2015; Published: January 1, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hron, J., Macák, T., & Andres, P. (2015). Overcoming the Uncertainty in the Du-Pont Graph of Profitability. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis63(6), 1891-1895. doi: 10.11118/actaun201563061891
Download citation

References

  1. BIRČIAKOVÁ, N., STÁVKOVÁ, J., SOUČEK, M. 2014. How marketing instruments affect consumer behavior in times of economic turbulence. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 62(6): 1257-1263. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201462061257 Go to original source...
  2. HEIJDEN, H. 2013. Profitability in the car industry. European Journal of Operational Research, 225: 420-428. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.09.046 Go to original source...
  3. CHANG, K. J. et al. 2014. On the DuPont analysis in the health care industry. J. Account. Public Policy, 33: 83-103. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.10.002 Go to original source...
  4. NAIR, A., FILER, L. 2003. Co-integration of firm strategies within groups: a long-run analysis of firm behavior in the Japanese steel industry. Strategic Management Journal, 24(2): 145-159. DOI: 10.1002/smj.286 Go to original source...
  5. SOLILOVÁ, V., NERUDOVÁ, D. 2015. Financial transaction tax: Determination of economic impact under DSGE model. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(2): 627-637. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201563020627 Go to original source...
  6. SCHATZMAN, M. 2002. Numerical Analysis: A Mathematical Introduction. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  7. SOLIMAN, M. T. 2008. The use of DuPont analysis by market participants. The Accounting Review, 83(3): 823-853. DOI: 10.2308/accr.2008.83.3.823 Go to original source...
  8. SÜLI, E. 2003. An Introduction to Numerical Analysis. Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  9. STICKNEY, C., BROWN, P. 2006. Financial Reporting and Statement Analysis, and Valuation. 6th ed. South-Western College Pub.
  10. TECLES, P. L., TABAK, B. M. 2010. Determinants of bank efficiency: the case of Brazil. European Journal of Operational Research, 207: 1587-1598. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2010.06.007 Go to original source...
  11. THOMAS, L. C. 2011. Modelling the profitability of credit cards by Markov decision processes. European Journal of Operational Research, 212: 123-130. Go to original source...
  12. VNOUČKOVÁ, L., HYRŠLOVÁ, J., TOMŠÍK, P. 2014. How does implementation of environmental management system contribute to corporate sustainability management. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 62(6): 1499-1508. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201462061499 Go to original source...
  13. WU, C.-R., LIN, C.-T., TSAI, P.-H. 2010. Evaluating business performance of wealth management banks. European Journal of Operational Research, 207: 971-979. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2010.04.034 Go to original source...
  14. YOHN, T. 2001. Accounting classification and the predictive content of earnings. The Accounting Review, 6: 337-355.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.