Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2015, 63(6), 1839-1845 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201563061839

Determinants of Czech Inhabitants' Living Standards

Naďa Birčiaková, Jana Stávková, Jakub Straka
Department of Marketing and Trade, Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

Living standards are influenced by several variables. In the submitted paper, they are divided into eight main groups based on analysing alternative indicators of living standards - public life, place of residence, economic area, educational area, health care, environment, interpersonal relationships and personality. The main source of the data is represented by the results of a questionnaire survey performed in 2013 and 2014 in the Czech Republic, focused on elicitation of inhabitants' opinions about how much 99 individual variables influence their living standards. Using Principal Component Analysis, there were seven factors created out of the assessed variables. They should be reflected by a complex assessment of living standards.

Keywords: standard of living, Czech inhabitants, factors, well-being, quality of life, perception, subjective opinion

Prepublished online: December 26, 2015; Published: January 1, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Birčiaková, N., Stávková, J., & Straka, J. (2015). Determinants of Czech Inhabitants' Living Standards. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis63(6), 1839-1845. doi: 10.11118/actaun201563061839
Download citation

References

  1. ANIELSKI, M. 2001. Measuring the Sustainability of Nations: The Genuine Progress Indicator System of Sustainable Well-being Accounts. The Fourth Biennial Conference of the Canadian Society for Ecological Economics: Ecological Sustainability of the Global Market Place. Montreal, Quebec. 1-52.
  2. CAMPBELL, A. and CONVERSE, P. 1972. The human Meaning of Social Change. 1st edition. New York: Russell Sage.
  3. COSTANZA, R., MAUREEN H., POSNER, et al. 2009. Beyond GDP: The Need for New Measures of Progress. The Pardee Papers, 4(46): 1-37. Go to original source...
  4. CUMMINS, R. A. 1997. Self-rated Quality of Life Scales for People with an Intellectual Disability: A Review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 10(3): 199-216. Wiley Online Library. [Online]. Accessible at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/%28ISSN%291468-3148. [Accessed: 2014, December 22]. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.1997.tb00017.x Go to original source...
  5. DASGUPTA, P. 1990. Well-being and the Extent of its Realization in Poor Countries. The Economic Journal, 100(400): 132. DOI: 10.2307/2234181 Go to original source...
  6. DORWICK, S., DUNLOP, Y. and QUIGGIN, J. 2003. Social Indicators and True Comparisions of Living of Standards. Journal of Development Economics, 70(2): 501-529. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3878(02)00107-4 Go to original source...
  7. GOTOWSKA, M. and JAKUBCZAK, A. 2013. Analysis of selected groups of indicators to assess the standard of living of the polish population. Studies and Proceeding of Polish Association for knowledge management, 63: 15-24.
  8. HICKS, N. L. 1979. Growth vs. Basic Needs: Is there a Trade-off? World Development, 7: 985-994. DOI: 10.1016/0305-750X(79)90066-4 Go to original source...
  9. KNAUSOVÁ, I. 2005. Selected Chapters of Social Policy [in Czech: Vybrané kapitoly ze sociální politiky]. 2nd edition. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci.
  10. KŘUPKA, J., PROVAZNÍKOVÁ, R., KA©PAROVÁ, et al. 2013. Standards of Living Modeling based on Objective Indicators with Using Cluster Analysis. International Journal of Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences, 7(8): 782-792.
  11. MANKIW, N. G. 2000. Principles of Economics [in Czech: Zásady ekonomie]. Praha: Grada Publishing.
  12. MATTHEWS, P. 2007. The concise Oxford dictionary of linguistics. 2nd edition. New York: Oxford University Press.
  13. NORDHAUS, W., TOBIN, J. 1972. Is growth obsolete? National Bureau of Economic Research.
  14. OECD. 2013. OECD Better Life Index. [Online]. Available at: http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/#/11111111100. [Accessed: 2014, December 22].
  15. POLÁČKOVÁ, J. and JINDROVÁ, A. 2011. Assessment of subjective aspects of the quality of live in the various regions of the Czech Republic. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 59(7): 267-274. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201159070267 Go to original source...
  16. POPE, C. L. 1993. The Changing View of the Standard-of-Living Question in the United States. The American Economic Review: Aea papers and processing, 83(2): 331-336.
  17. RAPLEY, M. 2003. Quality of Life Research: A Critical Introduction. 1st edition. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  18. SEN, A. 1988. The Standard of Living. 1st edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  19. SHUMAKOVA, O. V., ALKHIMENKO, O. N. and KUTUZOVA, M. V. 2014. Classification of municipal areas by living standards and socioeconomic development. Actual problems of economics, 161(11): 197-201.
  20. STÁVKOVÁ, J., ®UFAN, P. and BIRČIAKOVÁ, N. 2013. Standard of living in European Union. In: RAVINDRAN, A. and SHIRAZI, F., Business Review: Advanced Applications. 1st edition. United Kingdom: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 61-86.
  21. UNDP. ©2014. Human Development Reports. International Human Development Indicators. [online]. 2013 [cit. 2014-12-21]. Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics.
  22. WOLFF, E. N. 2009. Poverty and income distribution. 2nd edition. Michigan: Wiley-Blackwell.
  23. WOODARD, J. 2008. Three Reasons to Scrap GDP. Condor Options. [Online]. Available at: http://condoroptions.com/2008/04/06/three-reasons-to-scrap-gdp. [Accessed: 2014, December 22].

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.