Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2015, 63(1), 153-161 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201563010153

Analysis of the Heterogeneity of Weed Infestation in Cereal Stands

Jan Winkler1, Vojtěch Lukas2, Vladimír Smutný2
1 Department of Plant Biology, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
2 Department of Agrosystems and Bioclimatology, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

The aim of this study was to evaluate the heterogeneity of the incidence of individual weed species on a selected experimental field. This field was situated in the cadastre of the village Žabčice (South Moravian Region, Czech Republic). To evaluate the intensity of weed infestation, a field experiment was established. In 2011, altogether 33 weed species were identified in a stand of spring barley. In the next year, the total number of weeds in a stand of winter wheat was 22. Basing on results of the evaluation of infestation heterogeneity it was possible to detect the following trends: The first one concerned the incidence of significantly dominant species Chenopodium album and Veronica hederifolia in stands of spring barley and winter wheat, respectively. The second one expressed the incidence of the so-called sub-dominant species. Regarding the character of the incidence of these weed species it would be suitable to kill them by means of a targeted application of herbicides. Finally, the third trend concerned the incidence of that group of weeds that occurred in the major part of the experimental plot but in low numbers only. The abundance of these species was minimal and the total number of weed plants did not exceed the limit of 100 specimens. This group of weeds involved also those species that were markedly more frequent on plots situated closer to the margin of the experimental field. The targeted application of herbicides can be performed on plots with a lower level of weed infestation; another possibility, however, seems to be a targeted intervention that helps to control the incidence of a certain weed species and/or that is performed along the margin of the field where the different weed species are more frequent.

Keywords: weeds, cereals, heterogeneity, weed infestation, mapping of weed incidence
Grants and funding:

This study was performed within the framework of the project NAZV QI111A184 "Optimization of methods of weed control within the system of precision farming" and also as an output of the Internal Grant Agency of the Faculty of Agronomy, MENDELU BRNO, No. TP 10/2013 "Studies on selected factors influencing the manifestation of the biological potential of agricultural cultures".

Prepublished online: March 14, 2015; Published: April 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Winkler, J., Lukas, V., & Smutný, V. (2015). Analysis of the Heterogeneity of Weed Infestation in Cereal Stands. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis63(1), 153-161. doi: 10.11118/actaun201563010153
Download citation

References

  1. COLBACH, N., FORCELLA, F., JOHNSON, G. A. 2000. Spatial and temporal stability of weed populations over five years. Weed Science, 48: 366-377. DOI: 10.1614/0043-1745(2000)048[0366:SATSOW]2.0.CO;2 Go to original source...
  2. GERHARD, R., SÖKEFELD, M., TIMMERMANN, C., KROHMANN, P., KÜHBAUCH, W. 2000. Precision Weed Control - more than just saving herbicides. Z. PflKrankh. PflSchutz, Sonderh., XVII: 179-186.
  3. GERHARDS, R., SÖKEFELD, M., KNUF, D., KÜHBAUCH, W. 1996. Kartierung und geostatistische Analyse der Unkrautverteilung in Zuckerrübenschlägen als Grundlage für eine teilschlagspezifische Bekämpfung. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 176: 259-266. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.1996.tb00470.x Go to original source...
  4. GERHARDS, R., SÖKEFELD, M., KÜHBAUCH, W. 1998. Einsatz der digitalen Bildverarbeitung bei der teilschlagspezifischen Unkrautkontrolle. Z. PflKrankh. PflSchutz, Sonderh., XVI: 273-278.
  5. HAMOUZ, P. 2005. Optimalizace ochrany proti plevelům v závislosti na nerovnoměrnosti jejich výskytu na pozemku [Optimisation of weed control with regard to the non-uniformity of their ococurrence on fields, in Czech]. Disertation thesis. Praha: Czech Agricultural University Prague.
  6. HAMOUZ, P., SOUKUP, J. 2006. Precizní zemědělství: Precizní zemědělství v oblasti regulace zaplevelení [Precision agriculture: Precision agriculture in the domain of weed control, in Czech]. [online]. Prague: Research Institute of Plant Production, [cit. 2013-02-27]. Available at the address:
  7. JURADO-EXPÓSITO, M., LÓPEZ-GRANADOS, F., ATENCIANO, S., GARCÍA-TORRES, L., GONZÁLEZ-ANDÚJAR, J. L. 2009. A digital elevation model to aid geostatistical mapping of weeds in sunflower crops. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29: 391-400. DOI: 10.1051/agro:2008045 Go to original source...
  8. KALIVAS, D. P., VLACHOS, C. E., ECONOMOU, G., DIMOU, P. 2012. Regional mapping of perennial weeds in cotton with the use of geostatistics. Weed Science, 60: 233-243. DOI: 10.1614/WS-D-11-00121.1 Go to original source...
  9. KOHOUT, V. 1993. Regulace zaplevelení polí [Regulation of weed infestation of fields, in Czech]. 1st ed. Prague: Institute of Education, Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic.
  10. KROULÍK, M. 2012. Senzory pro měření půdních vlastností [Sensors for measuring soil properties, in Czech]. [online]. Prague [cit. 2013-03-31]. Available at the address: http://www.agroweb.cz/Senzory-pro-mereni-pudnichvlastnostis1643x58648.html.
  11. KROULÍK, M., SLEJŠKA, A., KOKOŠKOVÁ, D., VENCLOVÁ, V. 2011. Soil Electrical Conductivity as One Possible Tool for Predicting of Cirsium Arvense Infestation incidence. In: SOLONESKI, S., LARRAMENDY, M. L. (Eds.), Herbicides, Theory and Applications. INTECH Open Access Publisher, 145-160. Go to original source...
  12. KUNISCH, M. 2002. Precision Farming in der Unkrautbekämpfung. Z. PflKrankh. PflSchutz, Sonderh., XVIII: 415-420.
  13. KLEM, K. 2006. Využití fluorescence chlorofylu v rostlinolékařství [Use of chlorophyll fluorescence, in Czech]. Rostlinolékař, 1: 23-25.
  14. LÓPEZ-GRANADOS, F. 2011. Weed detection for site-specific weed management: Mapping and real-time approaches. Weed Research, 51: 1-11. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2010.00829.x Go to original source...
  15. LOUX, M. M., STACHLER, J. M., HARRISON, S. K. 1998. Weed Control Guide for Ohio Field Crops. Bulletin 789, Ohio State University, 15 pp.
  16. LUKAS, V., NEUDERT, L., KŘEN, J. 2011. Mapování variability půdy a porostů v precizním zemědělství: Metodika pro praxi [Mapping of soil and crop variability in precision farming: Methodology for practice, in Czech]. 1st ed. Brno: Mendel University in Brno.
  17. MIKULKA, J., CHODOVÁ, D. 2002. Hubení plevelů odolných vůči herbicidům [Killing of weeds resistant to herbicides, in Czech]. 3rd ed. Praha: Ústav zemědělských a potravinářských informací.
  18. PEREZ A. J., LOPEZ, F., BENLLOCH, J. V., CHRISTENSEN, S. 2000. Colour and shape analysis techniques for weed detection in cereal fields. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 25: 197-212. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1699(99)00068-X Go to original source...
  19. SMUTNÝ, V, VONDRA, M., KOCUREK, V. 2011. Stanovení optimálních dávek herbicidů s využitím přístrojů založených na měření změn v absorbanci záření a fluorescence chlorofylu [Determinaton of optimum doses of herbicides by means of instruments measurig changes in the absorbance of radiation and chlorophyll fluorescence, in Czech]. lst ed. Brno: Mendel University in Brno.
  20. SOILLE, P. 2000. Morphological image analysis applied to crop field mapping. Image Vision Computing, 18: 1025-1032. DOI: 10.1016/S0262-8856(00)00043-3 Go to original source...
  21. SÖKEFELD, M., GERHARDS, R., KÜHNBAUCH, W. 2000. Teilschlagspezifische Unkrautkontrolle - von der Unkrauterfassung bis zur Herbizidapplikation. Z. Pfl.Krankh. Pfl.Schutz, Sonderh., XVII: 227-233.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.