Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2015, 63(1), 95-100 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201563010095

Effect of Housing of Lactating Sows on Their Reproductive Performance and Losses of Piglets From Birth to Weaning

Pavel Nevrkla, Zdeněk Hadaš
Department of Animal Breeding, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

The objective of this study was to evaluate selected reproductive parametres of sows stabled in farrowing houses with different technologies and losses of piglets from birth to weaning. Each variant involved 40 sows and 40 litters and the aim was to demonstrate the effect of the housing on losses of piglets. One variant (housing A) was modern while the other (housing B) was older. The total number of piglets reached in housing A was 13.18 ± 1.85 against 13.03 ± 1.91 in housing B. The values of live-born piglets reached 11.50 ± 1.36 in housing A against 11.36 ± 1.46 in housing B. The number of stillborn piglets found in housing A was 1.68 ± 1.49 and in housing B 1.65 ± 1.17. The differences found between the groups in the total number of piglets and the number of live-born and stillborn piglets are not statistically significant. The number of reared piglets was 10.03 ± 1.33 in housing A versus 8.78 ± 1.56 in housing B. In group of sows in farrowing house A (housing A) the recorded loss of piglets in pieces was 1.48 ± 1.04 against 2.60 ± 1.63 in housing B. In percentage the loss of piglets in housing A reached 12.56 ± 8.50 versus 22.29 ± 13.46 in housing B. Statistical analysis of the numbers of reared piglets and losses of piglets proved highly statistically signifficant differences (P ≤ 0.001).

Keywords: housing, farrowing house, reproduction, losses
Grants and funding:

This study was supported by the project of MENDELU internal grant agency, Faculty of Agriculture No. TP 5/2014 and the NAZV Project No. QI 111A166 of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic.

Prepublished online: March 14, 2015; Published: April 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Nevrkla, P., & Hadaš, Z. (2015). Effect of Housing of Lactating Sows on Their Reproductive Performance and Losses of Piglets From Birth to Weaning. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis63(1), 95-100. doi: 10.11118/actaun201563010095
Download citation

References

  1. ANDREEV, A., ILIEV, A. and TODOROV, M. 1990. Výzkum stájového prostředí a užitkovosti kojících prasnic v lehkých stájích pro prasata. In: Sborník referátů z mezinárodní konference: Problémy chovu prasat ve velkovýrobních podmínkách. Praha: Vysoká škola zemědělská Praha.
  2. ANDERSEN, I. L., BERG, S. and BØE, K. E. 2005. Crushing of piglets by the mother sow (Sus scrofa) - purely accidental or a poor mother? Appl. Anim. Behav Sci., 93(1): 229-243. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2004.11.015 Go to original source...
  3. ARANGO, J., MISZTAL, I., TSURUTA, S., CULBERTSON, M., HOLL, J. W., and HERRING, W. 2006. Genetic study of individual preweaning mortality and birth weight in Large White piglets using threshold-linear models. Livest. Sci., 101(1-3): 208-218. DOI: 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.11.011 Go to original source...
  4. DAMM, B. I., VESTERGAARD, K. S., SCHRODER-PETERSEN, D. L. and LADEWIG, J. 2000. The effects of branches on prepartum nest building in gilts with access to straw. Appl. Anim. Behav Sci., 69(2): 113-124. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00122-2 Go to original source...
  5. DAMM, B. I., MOUSTSEN, V., JØRGENSEN, E., PEDERSON, L. J., HEISKANEN, T. and FORKMAN, B. 2006. Sow preferences for walls to lean against when lying down. Appl. Anim. Behav Sci., 99(1): 53-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.09.014 Go to original source...
  6. GU, Z., GAO, Y., LIN, B., ZHONG, Z., LIU, Z., WANG, C. and LI, B. 2011. Impacts of a freedom farrowing pen design on sow behaviours and performance. Prev. Vet. Med., 102(4): 296-303. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.08.001 Go to original source...
  7. HORKÝ, P. 2014. Influence of increased dietary selenium on glutathione peroxidase activity and glutathione concentration in erythrocytes of lactating sows. Ann. Anim. Scie., 14(4): 869-882. DOI: 10.2478/aoas-2014-0056 Go to original source...
  8. HORKÝ, P., JANČÍKOVÁ, P., SOCHOR, J., HYNEK, D., CHAVIS, G. J., RUTTKAY NEDECKÝ, B., CERNEI, N., ZÍTKA, O, ZEMAN, L., ADAM, V. and KIZEK, R. 2012. Effect of organic and inorganic form of selenium on antioxidant status of breeding boars ejaculate revealed by electrochemistry. Int. J. Electrochem. Sc., 7(10): 9643-9657. Go to original source...
  9. HORKÝ, P., RUTTKAY-NEDECKÝ, B., KREMPLOVÁ, M., KRYŠTOFOVÁ, O., KENŠOVÁ, R., HYNEK, D., BABULA, P., ZÍTKA, O., ZEMAN, L., ADAM, V. and KIZEK, R. 2013. Effect of different doses of organically bound selenium on antioxidant status and levels of metal ions in postpartum sows. Int. J. Electrochem. Sc., 8(5): 6162-6179. Go to original source...
  10. KAŠPAR, F. and VEJNAR, J. 1980. Vliv omezeného pohybu na výskyt poruch reprodukce a zdraví prasnic v podmínkách velkochovů. Živočišná výroba, 25(7): 553-560.
  11. KILBRIDE, A. L., MENDL, M., STATHAM, P., HELD, S., HARRIS, M., COOPERA, S. and GREENA, L. E. 2012. A cohort study of preweaning piglet mortality and farrowingaccommodation on 112 commercial pig farms in England. Prev. Vet. Med., 104(3-4): 271-291. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.11.011 Go to original source...
  12. KNAP, J. and HÁJEK, J. 1970. Hodnocení různých způsobů ustájení kojících prasnic a selat ve vztahu k užitkovosti. Živočišná výroba, 15(12): 893-900.
  13. MARCHANT, N. J., RUDD, A. R. and MENDL, M. T. 2000. Timing and causes of piglet mortality in alternative and conventional farrowing systems. Vet. Rec., 147(8): 209-214. DOI: 10.1136/vr.147.8.209 Go to original source...
  14. MELLOR, D. J. and STAFFORD, K. J. 2004. Animal welfare implications of neonatal mortality and morbidity in farm animals. Vet. J., 168(2): 118-133. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2003.08.004 Go to original source...
  15. NEJEDLÝ, J. 1999. Co lze očekávat na přelomu tisíciletí v technologiích chovu prasat. In: Sborník referátů z celostátní konference: Aktuální problémy chovu prasat. Praha: Česká zemědělská univerzita v Praze.
  16. NGUYEN, K., CASSAR, G., FRIENDSHIP, R. M., REWEY C., FARZAN, A. and KIRWOOD, R. N. 2011. Stillbirth and preweaning mortality in litters of sows induced to farrow with supervision compared to litters of naturally farrowing sows with minimal supervision. J. Swine Health Prod., 19(4): 214-217.
  17. OLIVIERO, C., HEINONEN, M., VALROS, A., HÄLLIA, O., PELTONIEMI, O. A. T. 2008. Effect of the environment on the physiology of the sow during late pregnancy, farrowing and early lactation. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 105(3-4): 365-377. DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.03.015 Go to original source...
  18. PAŠKA I. 1997. Využitie kotercov knop v chove ošipaných. In: Zborník referátov: Konferencie s medzinárodnou účasťou poriadanej pri príležitosti 50. výročia založenia ústavu. Nitra: Výskumný ústav živočíšnej výroby Nitra.
  19. RODRÍGUEZ, S. V., PLÀ, L. M. and ALBORNOZ, V. M. 2012. Modeling tactical planning decisions through a linear optimization model in sow farms. Livest. Sci., 143(2-3): 162-171. DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2011.09.006 Go to original source...
  20. ROOTWELT, V., REKSEN, O. and FRAMSTAD, T., 2012: Production traits of litters in 2 crossbred Duroc pig lines. J. Anim. Sci., 90(1): 152-158. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2011-3851 Go to original source...
  21. SCHNEIDER, J. F., REMPEL, L. A., ROHRER G. A. and BROWN-BRANDEL, T. M. 2011. Genetic parameter estimates among scale activity score and farrowing disposition with reproductive traits in swine. J. Anim. Sci., 89(11): 3514-3521. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2010-3510 Go to original source...
  22. ŠPINKA, M. and ILLMANNOVÁ, G. 1995. Skupinové ustájení rodících a kojících prasnic. In: Sborník z odborného semináře: Nové trendy a poznatky v živočišné produkci. České Budějovice: Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích, 106-109.
  23. VANDERHAEGHE, C., DEWULF, J., DE VLIEGHER, S., PAPADOPOULOS, G. A., DE KRUIF, A. and MAES, D. 2010. Longitudinal field study to assess sow level risk factors associated with stillborn piglets. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 120(1-4): 78-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.02.010 Go to original source...
  24. WEARY, D. M., PAJOR, E. A., FRASER, D. and HONKANEN, A. M. 1996. Sow body movements that crush piglets: a comparison between two types of farrowing accommodation. Appl. Anim. Behav Sci., 49(2): 149-158. DOI: 10.1016/0168-1591(96)01042-8 Go to original source...
  25. WOLF, J., ŽÁKOVÁ, E. and GROENEVELD, E. 2008. Within-litter variation of birth weight in hyperprolific Czech Large White sows and its relation to litter size traits, stillborn piglets and losses until weaning. Livest. Sci., 115(2-3): 195-205. DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2007.07.009 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.