Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2015, 63(1), 49-57 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201563010049

Historical Landscape Structures and Their Importance for Landscape Character

Petr Kučera1, Jaroslav Novák2, Jiří Löw2, Tomáš Dohnal2
1 Department of Landscape Planning, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
2 Löw a spol., Vranovská 102, 614 00 Brno, Czech Republic

This paper deals with studying and mapping of historical landscape structures, specifically with the so-called "unintended landscape composition", i. e. with such a landscape structures that did not arise with the compositional intent, but by means of economic exploitation. They are therefore not the result of landscape architects' suggestions, but rather the reflection of the normal way of life in Bohemia and Moravia.
The most important feature of the landscape are ground plan types of settlements and their "pluzinas" (ploughlands). According to the compactness of the settlement and the spatial arrangement of plots and objects, the settlements were put to different ground plan types. Also pluzinas (ploughlands) - supporting hinterland of settlements - we divide by size, shape and spatial arrangement of plots into different types. Because a settlement and ploughland have always been forming a single functional unit, we shall consider their mutual relationship, especially ownership relationship of ploughland with individual homesteads in a settlement. The result is the definition of areas with the same type of settlements and ploughlands, i. e. the area with the same type of land use, the area with the same landscape character.
Knowledge of historical type of pluzinas (ploughland) should be the fundamental basis for planning the landscape - when designing comprehensive landscaping. Likewise, knowledge of the historical type of settlement should be used in town & country planning so that the future development of settlements respects the historical context of a given area. Then it is possible to harmoniously integrate the new development into the landscape without brutally interfering it, as it happened in many places and still happens.

Keywords: historical structure of landscape, concept of landscape arrangement, historical types of rural settlements and their pluzinas (ploughlands)
Grants and funding:

The article was based on the support of the project No. DF11P01OVV019 - Landscape architecture's methods and tools for spatial development, that meets the thematic priority TP 1.4. of the Programme of Applied Research and Development of the National and Cultural Identity (in short, "NAKI"), funded by the Ministry of Culture of the Czech Republic.

Prepublished online: March 14, 2015; Published: April 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kučera, P., Novák, J., Löw, J., & Dohnal, T. (2015). Historical Landscape Structures and Their Importance for Landscape Character. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(1), 49-57. doi: 10.11118/actaun201563010049
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. MINISTERSTVO ŽIVOTNÍHO PROSTŘEDÍ ČR. 2004. Landscape atlas of the Czech Republic.
    2. BEDE VENERABILIS 731. Historia ecclesiastica gentis Anglorum" [Ecclesiastical History] .
    3. BERANOVÁ, M. a KUBAČÁK, A. 2010. Dějiny zemědělství v Čechách a na Moravě. Praha: Libri.
    4. BRABCOVÁ, E., MOLNAROVÁ, K. 2010. Pluzina: the issues of documenting a vernacular landscape. In: Landscape Legacy: Landscape Architecture between Art and Science, International Study Group on the Multiple Use of Lands, Maastricht, Netherlands.
    5. KUČA, K. 1991. Urbanistická kompozice středověkých měst a městeček v jižních Čechách. Archaeologia historica, 1992(17): 115-130.
    6. KUČA, K. 2006-2011. Města a městečka v Čechách, na Moravě a ve Slezsku I-VIII. Praha: Libri.
    7. LÁZNIČKA, Z. 1956. Typy venkovského osídlení v Československu. Práce brněnské základny ČSAV, Brno, XXVIII(3): 95-134.
    8. LENNARD, R. 1944. The origin of the Fiscal Carucate in The Economic History Review, 14 (1): 51-63. Go to original source...
    9. MÁČEL, O., 1955. Základní problematika urbanistické struktury vesnice v Čechách a na Moravě I a II. Brno: Výzkumný ústav výstavby a architektury.
    10. MENCL, V. 1980. Lidová architektura v Československu. Praha: Academia.
    11. ŠKABRADA, J. 1999. Lidové stavby: Architektura českého venkova. Praha: Argo.
    12. ŠTĚPÁNEK, M. 1967. Plužina jako pramen dějin osídlení. Příspěvky k dějinám osídlení 1. Československý časopis historický, XV(5): 725-746.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content