Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2014, 62(6), 1437-1450 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201462061437

Capital Stock Value Development in Relation to the New EU Countries' Agricultural Sector Development

Miroslav Svatoš1, Luboš Smutka1,2, Richard Selby1
1 Department of Economics and Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Kamýcká 129, Praha 6-Suchdol, 165 21, Czech Republic
2 Faculty of Economics and Environmental Management, ITMO University, Saint Petersburg, Lomonosov street 9, St. Petersburg, 191002, Russian Federation

This paper will analyse agricultural sector development in individual new EU member states with emphasis on capital stock value development in agriculture. The main objective is to identify the relationship between capital stock value development, and agricultural sector performance in the individual analysed countries. The results of the analysis are as follows. The agricultural sector has significantly changed its structure and position within the national economy of individual new EU member states in the 20 years since the early 1990s. The size of the agricultural sector reduced in each of the analysed countries, resulting in a reduction in the value of the agricultural sector performance. Despite the significant reduction of the agricultural sector in many analysed, some became more efficient in terms of their agricultural sector performance. Individual country's agricultural sectors became more effective and more competitive. Individual country's agricultural sector size and performance development are closely related to capital stock value in agriculture. Both the agricultural sector structure, and agricultural sector production performance are closely related to available capital stock value. In line with the main objective of this paper, the most sensitive segments of the agricultural sector in relation to capital stock are livestock production, land development and the number of economically active persons in agriculture. Regarding sensitivity of agricultural production performance in relation to changes in capital stock value, the most sensitive are livestock production and non-food agricultural production.

Keywords: capital stock, agriculture, production, value, volume, structure, correlation, sensitivity/elasticity, analysis, trend, European Union, new members
Grants and funding:

This paper was prepared with financial support of the projects "Socio-economic practices of sustainable development in the new industrialization". The project is founded by the Government of the Russian Federation, Grant 074-U01 and conducted within the ITMO University.

Published: January 17, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Svatoš, M., Smutka, L., & Selby, R. (2014). Capital Stock Value Development in Relation to the New EU Countries' Agricultural Sector Development. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis62(6), 1437-1450. doi: 10.11118/actaun201462061437
Download citation

References

  1. BALL, V. E., LINDAMOOD, W. A., NEHRING, R. et al. 2008. Capital as a factor of production in OECD agriculture: measurement and data. Applied Economics, 40(10): 1253-1277. DOI: 10.1080/00036840600771320 Go to original source...
  2. BARTOLINI, F., VIAGGI, D. 2013. The common agricultural policy and the determinants of changes in EU farm size. Land use Policy, 31(Special Issue): 126-135. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.10.007 Go to original source...
  3. BARTOŠOVÁ, D., BARTOVÁ, Ľ., FIDRMUC, J. 2008. EU Enlargement Implications on the New Member States Agri-food Trade. In: 2008 International Congress. Ghent, Belgium, August 26-29, 2008. European Association of Agricultural Economists. Available online: http://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaae08/44122.html.
  4. BIELIK, P. et al. 2010. Economics, social policy and citizenship in the EU Evidence of V4 countries and perspectives for Ukraine. Nitra: SPU Nitra.
  5. BLAZEJCZYK-MAJKA, L., KALA, R., MACIEJEWSKI, K. 2012. Productivity and efficiency of large and small field crop farms and mixed farms of the old and new EU regions. Agric. Econ. - Czech., 58(2): 61-71. DOI: 10.17221/48/2011-AGRICECON Go to original source...
  6. BOHÁČKOVÁ, I., HRABÁNKOVÁ, M. 2011. Influence of subsidies on height and structures of farmers' incomes in EU member states. Agris On-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 3(3): 29-43.
  7. DE CASTRO, P., ADINOLFI, F., CAPITANIO, F. et al. 2012. The future of European agricultural policy: Some reflections in the light of the proposals put forward by the EU Commission. New Medit, 11(2): 4-11.
  8. DRABÍK, D., BÁRTOVÁ, L. 2008. An Assessment of the Impact of the EU Enlargement on Agri-food Trade of New EU Member States. Nitra: SPU Nitra
  9. FAO. 2014. Faostat database. [on-line]. Available at: http://faostat.fao.org/site/479/default.aspx. [Cited 1/8/2014].
  10. HINDLS, R., HRONOVÁ, S., SEGER, J., FISCHER, J. 2007. Statistika pro ekonomy. Praha: Professional Publishing.
  11. HORSKÁ, E. et al. 2011. European studies on intercultural dimension of international business. Nitra: SPU Nitra.
  12. HORSKÁ, E., HAMBÁLKOVÁ, M. 2008. Internationalization of agrarian companies. Nitra: SPU Nitra.
  13. JENÍČEK, V. 2009. The role of foreign trade and its effects. Agric. Econ. - Czech, 55(5): 211-220. DOI: 10.17221/1507-AGRICECON Go to original source...
  14. JUNKOVÁ, S., MATUŠKOVÁ, E. 2011. The influence of crisis on the sector structure of economy focusing on agriculture. Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 2(3): 15-26.
  15. KUBICOVÁ, L. et al. 2012. Income Situation of the Households in the Slovak and the Czech Republic. Acta oeconomica et informatica, 15(1): 6-13.
  16. LUKAS, Z., POSCHL, J. et al. 2004. Possibilities and barriers of agrarian sector development in central and eastern European countries within EU-25. Praha: Ministry of agriculture.
  17. MATTHEWS, K. B., BUCHAN, K., MILLER, D. G. et al. 2013. Reforming the CAP With area-based payments, who wins and who loses? Land Use Policy, 31(Special Issue): 209-222. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.06.013 Go to original source...
  18. MEZERA, J., ŠPIČKA, J. 2013. Economic Effects of Investment Support of Adding Value to Food Products. Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 1(5): 39-49.
  19. PIENIADZ, A., WANDEL, J., GLAUBEN, T. et al. 2010. 20 Years of Transition in Central and Eastern European Agriculture: Achievements and Challenges. Berichte über Landwirtschaft, 88(1): 118-146.
  20. POKRIVČÁK, J., DRÁBIK, D. 2008. Agricultural Trade in Central and Eastern Europe. Nitra: SPU Nitra.
  21. RAMNICEANU, I., ACKRILL, R. 2007. EU rural development policy in the new member states: Promoting multifunctionality? Journal of Rural Studies, 23(4): 416-429. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.10.003 Go to original source...
  22. SVATOŠ, M. et al. 2011. Globalization processes in agriculture and the role of EU within global market. Praha: PowerPrint.
  23. SWINNEN, J. F. M., VRANKEN, L. 2010. Reforms and agricultural productivity in Central and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Republics: 1989-2005. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 33(3): 241-258. DOI: 10.1007/s11123-009-0162-6 Go to original source...
  24. VIAGGI, D., GOMEZ, Y. PALOMA, S., MISHRA, A. et al. 2013. The role of the EU Common Agricultural Policy: Assessing multiple effects in alternative policy scenarios. Land Use Policy, 31(Special Issue): 99-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.04.019 Go to original source...
  25. WORLD BANK. 2014. WDI database. [on-line]. Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators. [Cited 1/8/2014].
  26. ŽÍDKOVÁ, D., ŘEZBOVÁ, H., ROSOCHATECKÁ, E. 2011. Analysis of Development of Investments in the Agricultural Sector of the Czech Republic. Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 1(3): 33-43.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.