Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2014, 62(6), 1353-1361 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201462061353

Rogun - Hydropower Generating Controversy in Central Asia

Lea Melnikovová1, Bohumil Havrland2, Radim Valenčík3
1 Department of International Business, Metropolitan University Prague, Dubečská 900/10, 100 31 Praha 10-Strašnice, Czech Republic
2 Department of Sustainable Technologies, Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 21 Praha 6-Suchdol, Czech Republic
3 Department of Economics and International Affairs, Faculty of Economic Studies, The University of Finance and Administration, Estonská 500, 101 00 Praha 10, Czech Republic

The aim of this paper is to analyse the current conflict between Uzbekistan and Tajikistan over shared water resources, and propose an adequate solution. The tensions between the two countries are associated with the completion of a huge dam on a river on the Tajik territory. Such construction may have a negative impact on Uzbekistan's irrigation needs since it may restrict inflow to the Amudarya River which is Uzbekistan's key water resource. While Tajikistan intends to use water for hydropower, Uzbekistan needs water mainly for its cotton fields. This paper analyses the background, benefits and risks of the dam, roots of the tension, and suggests methods of resolving them. Based on the current dispute, the problem of shared water resources is generalized, discussed and two complementary approaches are presented. The international water law offers a set of guidelines applicable on transboundary water conflicts; the significance of the 1997 UN Convention concerning the law of the non-navigational uses of international watercourses is emphasized. Another instrument to grasp this problem is the game theory. The water allocation problem can be described using the Nash bargaining solution. This paper demonstrates that both approaches can contribute to resolving existing disputes over shared water resources.

Keywords: hydropower, irrigation, shared water resources, water allocation, international water law, game theory

Published: January 17, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Melnikovová, L., Havrland, B., & Valenčík, R. (2014). Rogun - Hydropower Generating Controversy in Central Asia. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 62(6), 1353-1361. doi: 10.11118/actaun201462061353
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. BATUCA, D. and JORDAAN, J. 2000. Silting and desilting of reservoirs. Brookfield, VT: CRC Press / Balkema.
    2. DINAR, A. et al. 2007. Bridges Over Water: Understanding Transboundary Water Conflict, Negotiation and Cooperation. New Jersey: World Scientific Series on Energy and Resource Economics. Go to original source...
    3. DISKIN, A., KOPPEL, M. and SAMET, D. 2011. Generalized Raiffa Solutions. Games and Economic Behavior. ScienceDirect. [Online]. 73: 452-458. Available at: http://www.tau.ac.il/~samet/papers/Generalized%20Raiffa%20solutions.pdf. [Accessed: 2014, March 17]. Go to original source...
    4. DUKHOVNY, V. and SOKOLOV, V. 2003. Lessons on Cooperation Building to Manage Water Conflicts in the Aral Sea Basin. UNESCO - IHP. [Online]. Available at: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001332/133291e.pdf. [Accessed: 2013, November 24].
    5. ELHANCE, A. P. 1997. Conflict and Cooperation over Water in the Aral Sea Basin. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 20(2): 207-218. Academic Search Complete. [Online]. Available at: http://web.ebscohost.com. [Accessed: 2014, May 5]. DOI: 10.1080/10576109708436034 Go to original source...
    6. ELHANCE, A. P. 2000. Hydropolitics: Grounds for Despair, Reasons for Hope. International Negotiation, 5(2): 201-222. Business Source Complete. [Online]. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718060020848730.[Accessed: 2014, May 5]. Go to original source...
    7. IKRAMI, D. 2012. Ot Nureka k Rogunu. Embassy of Tajikistan in Austria. [Online]. Available at: http://tajikembassy.at/_ld/1/154_Ot_Nureka_k_Rog.pdf. [Accessed: 2014, January 14].
    8. INTERSTATE COMMISSION FOR WATER COORDINATION OF CENTRAL ASIA. 1992. Agreement Between the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, the Republic of Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and the Republic of Uzbekistan on Cooperation in the Field of Joint Management of the Use and Conservation of Water Resources of Interstate Sources. [Online]. Available at: http://www.icwc-aral.uz/statute1.htm. [Accessed: 2014, January 5].
    9. KALAI, E. and SMORODINSKY, M. 1975. Other Solutions to Nash's Bargaining Problem. Econometrica, 43(3): 513-518. JSTOR. [Online]. Available at: www.jstor.org/stable/1914280. [Accessed: 2014, March 17]. DOI: 10.2307/1914280 Go to original source...
    10. KALAI, E. 1977. Proportional Solutions of Bargaining Situations: Interpersonal Utility Comparisons. Econometrica, 45(7): 1623-1630. JSTOR. [Online]. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1913954. [Accessed: 2014, March 17]. DOI: 10.2307/1913954 Go to original source...
    11. KASYMOV, S. 2011. Water resource Disputes: Conflict and Cooperation in Drainage basins. International Journal on World Peace, 28(3): 81-110. ProQuest Central. [Online]. Available at: http://search.proquest.com/docview/900377814?accountid=17203. [Accessed: 2014, May 4].
    12. MCCAFFREY, S. 2008. Convention on the Law of the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses. United Nations Audiovisual Library of International Law. [Online]. Available at: http://legal.un.org/avl/pdf/ha/clnuiw/clnuiw_e.pdf. [Accessed: 2014, January 16].
    13. NASH, J. F. 1950. The Bargaining Problem. Econometrica, 18(2): 155-162. JSTOR. [Online]. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1907266. [Accessed: 2014, March 17]. DOI: 10.2307/1907266 Go to original source...
    14. RAIFFA, H. 1953. Arbitration Schemes for Generalized Two Person Games. Contributions to the Theory of Games, 2(28): 361-387. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press. Go to original source...
    15. SHAKIROV, N. 2013. Stroitel'stvo Rogunskoj GES privedet k zasoleniyu zemel'. Interview by 12news.uz on 14 March 2013. [Online]. Available at: http://www.12news.uz/news/2013/03/14/строительство-рогунской-гэс-приведе/. [Accessed: 2013, November 21].
    16. THE ECONOMIST. 2013. Hydropower in Tajikistan: Folie de Grandeur. [Online]. Available at: http://www.economist.com/news/asia/21582325-president-edifice-complex-screwing-motherland-folie-de-grandeur. [Accessed: 2013, September 25].
    17. THE WORLD BANK. 2010. Methodology for Ranking Irrigation Infrastructure Investment Projects: Republic of Uzbekistan. [Online]. Available at: goo.gl/o4YToS. [Accessed: 2014, January 16].
    18. THE WORLD BANK. 2013a. Assessment Studies for Proposed Rogun Hydropower Project in Tajikistan. [Online]. Available at: http://www.worldbank.org/en/region/eca/brief/rogun-assessment-studies. [Accessed: 2013, November 21].
    19. THE WORLD BANK. 2013b. Fourth Riparian Meetings on Rogun Assessment Studies. [Online]. Available at: http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2013/10/22/fourth-riparian-meetings-on-rogun-assessment-studies. [Accessed: 2013, November 21].
    20. THE WORLD BANK. 2014. Central Asia South Asia Electricity Transmission and Trade Project (CASA 1000). [Online]. Available at: http://www.worldbank.org/projects/P145054?lang=en. [Accessed: 2014, May 4].
    21. TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL. 2012. Corruption Perceptions Index 2012. [Online]. Available at: http://www.transparency.org/cpi2012/results. [Accessed: 2013, November 21].
    22. U.S. & FOREIGN COMMERCIAL SERVICE and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE. Doing Business in Tajikistan: 2012 Country Commercial Guide for U.S. Companies. 2012. [Online]. Available at: http://www.buyusainfo.net/docs/x_6913202.pdf. [Accessed: 2013, February 9].
    23. UNITED NATIONS TREATY COLLECTION. 1997. Convention on the Law of the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses. [Online]. Available at: goo.gl/EEpYqU. [Accessed: 2014, January 5].
    24. WEGERICH, K. 2009. The New Great Game: Water Allocation in Post-Soviet Central Asia. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 10(2): 117-123. ProQuest Central. [Online]. Available at: http://search.proquest.com.zdroje.vse.cz/docview/221211397/abstract?accountid=17203. [Accessed: 2014, January 15].
    25. ZIGANSHINA, D. 2012. International Water Law in Central Asia: The Nature of Substantive Norms and What Flows from It. Asian Journal of International Law, 2(1): 169-192. ProQuest Central. [Online]. Available at http://search.proquest.com.zdroje.vse.cz/docview/912371547?accountid=17203. [Accessed: 2013, November 21]. DOI: 10.1017/S2044251311000087 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content