Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2014, 62(6), 1221-1231 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201462061221

What Affects the Information Provided on the Web? Case of Czech Rural Municipalities

Pavel Bachmann, Václav Zubr
Department of Management, University of Hradec Králové, Rokitanského 62, 500 03 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic

Electronic information availability has become an innate part of public corporate governance on all levels of public administration. Given paper focuses on such availability made throughout a platform of municipal website. Firstly, the paper objective focuses on identification of current level of web information openness. Secondly, it aims on examination of factors affecting the level of openness. Primary data on the information openness were gathered through the website analysis of randomly selected municipalities (n = 400) with population up to 2,000 inhabitants.
The findings showed that majority of municipalities operate functional website (97%). Worse situation was found in provision of information about local politicians (particularly their contact details) and the office (official mail, e-mail and telephone). The openness in economic transparency is satisfactory regards to publishing of municipal documents and its extent; however not as good situation is in openness of public procurement description.
Research hypothesis examination confirmed that information openness is positively associated with municipal population, wealth of the municipality and lack of municipal debt; on the other hand the information openness is not influenced by belonging of the municipality to certain region neither personality of the mayor.

Keywords: Czech Republic, public governance, provision of information, municipality, openness, website

Published: January 17, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Bachmann, P., & Zubr, V. (2014). What Affects the Information Provided on the Web? Case of Czech Rural Municipalities. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis62(6), 1221-1231. doi: 10.11118/actaun201462061221
Download citation

References

  1. BACHMANN, P. 2010. Disparity obcí v oblasti poskytování informací. E + M Ekonomie a Management, 11(3): 116-126.
  2. CHRISTIAENS, J. 1999. Financial accounting reform in Flemish municipalities: an empirical investigation. Financial Accountability and Management, 15(1): 21-40. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0408.00072 Go to original source...
  3. CZECH REPUBLIC. 2000. Act No. 101/2000 on Protection of Personal Data. Czech Statute-book.
  4. CZECH REPUBLIC. 1999. Act No. 106/1999 on Free Access To Information. Czech Statute-book.
  5. CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE. 2009. List of municipalities of the Královéhradecký Region in alphabetical order and their territorial and administrative districts. Territorial structure as at 1st. January 2009. [on-line]. Cited from: http://www.stredocesky.czso.cz/csu/2011edicniplan.nsf/engt/450035659/$File/521317110101.pdf. [cit. 2011-03-05].
  6. EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. 2003. Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information. Official Journal of the European Union.
  7. DUNLEAVY, P., MARGETTS, H. 1999. Government on the web. Report commissioned by the National Audit Office (HC 87). London: National Audit Office.
  8. GANDÍA, J. L., ARCHIDONA, M. C. 2008. Determinants of website information by Spanish city councils. Online Information Review, 32(1): 35-57. DOI: 10.1108/14684520810865976 Go to original source...
  9. HALL, L. M., KENNEDY S. S. 2008. Public and nonprofit management and the "New Governance". The American Review of Public Administration, 38: 307-321. DOI: 10.1177/0275074007309153 Go to original source...
  10. HEWSON, C. 2007. Gathering data on the Internet. Qualitative approaches and possibilities for mixed methods research. The Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology. Oxford University Press.
  11. KOMÁRKOVÁ, J., MÁCHOVÁ, R., BEDNARČÍKOVÁ, I. 2008. Požadavky uživatelů na kvalitu webových stránek městského úřadu. E + M Ekonomie a Management, 11(3): 116-126.
  12. KUŽÍLEK, O. 2012. Povinně zveřejňované informace na webových stránkách měst a obcí [Compulsory published information on municipality websites]. [on-line]. Cited from http://www.uzitecnyweb.cz/21-povinne-zverejnovane-informace-na-webovych-strankach-mest-a-obci. [cit. 2012-01-02].
  13. MATOUŠKOVÁ, Z., VYMAZAL, J. 2006. Vliv informačních a komunikačních technologií na další vzdělávání. Working paper NOZV - NVF, No. 3/2006.
  14. MARGETTS, H. 2005. Virtual Organizations. In: The Oxford Hanbook of Public Management. Oxford University Press, 305-311. Go to original source...
  15. MATEI, L., MATEI, A. 2011. Integrated approach of the citizen's role in relation to the public services. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 8: 1865-1984. DOI: 10.1007/s12208-010-0059-0 Go to original source...
  16. MORRIS, S., SHIN, H. S. 2002. Social value of public information. The American Economic Review, 92: 1521-1534. DOI: 10.1257/000282802762024610 Go to original source...
  17. OPM, CIPFA 2004. Good Governance Standard for Public Services. The Independent Commission on Good Governance in Public Services. OPM (Office for Public Management Ltd) and CIPFA (The Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy.) [on-line]. Cited from http://www.cipfa.org.uk/pt/download/governance_standard.pdf. [cit. 2011-10-04].
  18. OSBORNE, S. 2006. The new public governance. Public Management Review, 8: 377-387. DOI: 10.1080/14719030600853022 Go to original source...
  19. PAVEL, J., CÍSAŘOVÁ, E. 2008. Průvodce komunálními rozpočty aneb jak může informovaný občan střežit obecní pokladnu [Guide in municipal budgets or how a well informed citizen might control municipal treasury]. [on-line]. Praha: Transparency International Česká republika. Cited from http://www.transparency.cz/pruvodce-komunalnimi-rozpocty. [cit. 2011-11-14].
  20. PRESSEL, A. 2010. Effective Web Design. In: HART, T. et al.: Internet for Nonprofits Management. John Wiley and Sons.
  21. PERLÍN, R. 1999. Venkov, typologie venkovského prostoru. (Countryside and countryside area classification.) Česká etnoekologie. [on-line]. Praha: MV ČR. Cited from http://aplikace.mvcr.cz/archiv2008/odbor/reforma/perlin.pdf. [Cit. 2011-10-14].
  22. RHODES, R. A. W. 1996. The new governance: governing without government. Political Studies, 44: 652-667. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x Go to original source...
  23. SALAMON, L. M. 2002. The New Governance and the Tools of Public Action. Tools of Government. A Guide to the New Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  24. SCHERER, H. 2004. Úvod do metody obsahové analýzy: Analýza obsahu mediálních sdělení [Introduction to methods of content analysis: Content analysis of media communication]. Praha: Karolinum.
  25. SMUTEK, M. 2009. Dlouhodobé reformy sociálního blahobytu a sociálně-politické vládnutí [Long-term reforms of social welfare and social-political governance]. Fórum sociální politiky, 3: 2-5.
  26. ŠEDOVÁ, K. 2011. Studia paedagogica. [on-line]. Cited from http://www.phil.muni.cz/journals/sp. [cit. 2011-04-07].
  27. THOMAS, J. C., STREIB, G. 2003. The new face of Government: Citizen-Initiated Contacts in the Era of E-Government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13: 83-102. DOI: 10.1093/jpart/mug010 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.