Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2013, 61(4), 1137-1144 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201361041137

The influence of subsidies on the economic performance of Czech farms in the regions

Miroslav Svatoš, Markéta Chovancová
Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 21 Prague 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic

The main goal is analysis of the influence of subsidies on the economic performance of farms in individual regions since the Czech Republic joined the EU. The basis for verification of the hypotheses was data from the Farm Accountancy Data Network of the Czech Republic (FADN CR) broken down by regions. The economic performance of farms is determined here on the basis of six selected proportional indicators of financial analysis and their statistical processing using the WSA and TOPSIS methods. By both the WSA and the TOPSIS methods, in 2004-2010 the farms in the Karlovy Vary Region and in the last monitored year (2011) the farms in the Southern Moravia Region were identically evaluated as having the best economic performance. In 2004 the WSA method identified the farms with the worst economic performance as being in Vysočina, while the TOPSIS method rated the Ústí nad Labem Region as having the farms with the worst performance. In 2005-2006, both methods identically put the Pilsen Region in last place for economic performance of farms, while in 2007 the farms in Liberec Region and again in 2008 the farms in Pilsen Region were in last place. In 2009 the WSA and TOPSIS methods identically identified the farms with the worst economic performance as being in the South Bohemia Region. During 2010-2011 the two methods agreed that the farms with the worst economic performance were in Pilsen Region. Economic performance of farms in the regions Ústí nad Labem, Pardubice, Vysočina, Central Bohemia, Hradec Králové, South Moravia, Ostrava, and Olomouc, and also vertical economic performance of farms is dependent on the amount of subsidies received. On the other hand, for economic performance of farms in the Liberec, Pilsen, and Karlovy Vary regions, this dependence must be refuted. The assumption that the Common Agricultural Policy contributes towards the reducing of economic disparities between farms in the individual regions of the Czech Republic, has been confirmed only by the TOPSIS method in absolute expression. Nonetheless, by the WSA method in absolute and relative expression and by the TOPSIS method in relative expression, it must be refuted.

Keywords: Common Agricultural Policy, subsidies, Czech farms, economic performance, regions, WSA and TOPSIS methods
Grants and funding:

Research presented in this paper is the result of a research grant MSM 6046070906 "Economics of Czech agricultural resources and their efficient usage within the framework of multifunctional agri-food systems."

Received: May 2, 2013; Published: July 13, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Svatoš, M., & Chovancová, M. (2013). The influence of subsidies on the economic performance of Czech farms in the regions. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis61(4), 1137-1144. doi: 10.11118/actaun201361041137
Download citation

References

  1. ALTMAN, E. I., HOTCHKISS, E., 2006: Corporate Financial Distress and Bankruptcy. 3rd edition New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, 368 p. ISBN 978-0-471-69189-1.
  2. BAŠEK, V., KRAUS, J., 2011: Comparison of selected indicators of farms in the EU member states. Agricultural Economics, 57, 2: 71-84. ISSN 0139-570X. Go to original source...
  3. BEHZADIAN, M., OTAGHSANA, S. K., YAZDANI, M., IGNATIUS, J., 2012: A state-of-art survey of Topsis applications. Expert Systems with Applications (Elsevier), 39, 17: 13051-13069. ISSN 0957-4174. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056 Go to original source...
  4. FENG, CH. M., WANG, R. T., 2000: Performance evaluation for airlines including the consideration of financial ratios. Journal of Air Transport Management (Elsevier), 6, 3: 133-142. ISSN 1791-6771. DOI: 10.1016/S0969-6997(00)00003-X Go to original source...
  5. HRABÁNKOVÁ, M., BOHÁČKOVÁ I., 2009: Conditions of sustainable development in the Czech Republic in compliance with the recommendation of the European commission. Agricultural Economics, 55, 3: 156-160. ISSN 0139-570X. Go to original source...
  6. CHRÁSKA, M., 2000: Základy výzkumu v pedagogice. 2. vyd. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého, 257 s. ISBN 80-7067-798-8.
  7. JARDIN, P., SÉVERIN, E., 2011: Predicting corporate bankrupcy using a self-organizing map: An empirical study to improve the forecasting horizon of a financial failure model. Decision Support Systems (Elsevier), 51, 3: 701-711. ISSN 0167-9236. DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2011.04.001 Go to original source...
  8. NEUMAIEROVÁ, I., NEUMAIER, I., 2002: Výkonnost a tržní hodnota firmy. Praha: Grada Publishing. 215 s. ISBN 80-247-0125-1.
  9. NIEMAN, M., SCHMIDT, J. H., NEUKIRCHEN, M., 2008: Improving performance of corporate ranking prediction models by reducing financial ratio heterogenity. Journal of banking & Finance (Elsevier), 32, 3: 434-446. ISSN 0378-4266. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.05.015 Go to original source...
  10. KOPTA, D., 2009: Possibilities of financial health indicators used for prediction of future. Agricultural Economics, 55, 3: 111-125. ISSN 0139-570X. Go to original source...
  11. SEDLÁČEK, J., KOUŘILOVÁ, J., PŠENČÍK, J., 2012: Models of the realistic reporting of subsidies in the farm accounting. Agricultural Economics, 58, 1: 34-40. ISSN 0139-570X. Go to original source...
  12. STŘELEČEK, F., KOPTA, D., LOSOSOVÁ, J., ZDENĚK, R., 2012: Economic results of agricultural enterprises in 2010. Acta Univ. Agric. et Silvic. Mendelianae Brun., 60, 7: 315-328. ISSN 1211-8516. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201260070315
  13. STŘELEČEK, F., ZDENĚK, R., LOSOSOVÁ, J., 2009: Comparison of agricultural subsidies in the Czech Republic and in the selected states of the European Union. Agricultural Economics, 55, 11: 519-533. ISSN 0139-570X. Go to original source...
  14. TAMARI, M., 1984: The use of a bankrupcy forecasting model to analyze corporate behavior in Israel. Journal of banking & Finance (Elsevier), 8, 2: 293-302. ISSN 0378-4266. DOI: 10.1016/0378-4266(84)90009-8 Go to original source...
  15. THOMAS NG, S., WONG, J. M. W., ZHANG, J., 2011: Applying Z-score model to distinguish insolvent construction companies in China. Habitat International (Elsevier), 35, 4: 599-607. ISSN 0197-3975. DOI: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.03.008 Go to original source...
  16. TRIANTAPHYLLOU, E., 2000: Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods: A comparative Study. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 288 p. ISBN 0-7923-6607-7. Go to original source...
  17. TRNKOVÁ, G., MALÁ, Z., VASILENKO, A., 2012: Analysis of the Effects of Subsidies on the Economic Behavior of Agricultural Businesses Focusing on Animal Production. Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 4, 4: 115-126. ISSN 1804-1930.
  18. UCAK, H., 2012: Producer price disparities in the EU agriculture: divergence or convergence. Agricultural Economics, 58, 8: 367-371. ISSN 0139-570X. Go to original source...
  19. ÚSTAV ZEMĚDĚLSKÉ EKONOMIKY A INFORMACÍ, 2012: Farmářská účetní datová síť ČR (FADN CR) - modul FADN RESEARCH/DATA (databáze ekonomických údajů o zemědělských subjektech v České republice), poslední revize 12.11.2012 [cit. 2012-02-22]. Dostupné z.
  20. VIAGGI, D., 2013: The role of the EU Common Agricultural Policy: Assessing multiple effects in alternative policy scenarios. Land Use Policy (Elsevier), 31, 2: 99-101. ISSN 0264-8377. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.04.019 Go to original source...
  21. VOŠTA, M., 2012: Agriculture under conditions of globalisation focussed on the expansion of the EU. Agricultural Economics, 58, 4: 165-171. ISSN 0139-570X. Go to original source...
  22. ZANAKIS, S., SOLOMON, A., WISHART, N., DUBLISH, S., 1998: Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods. European Journal of Operational Research (Elsevier), 107, 3: 507-529. ISSN 0377-2217. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00147-1 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.