Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2013, 61(4), 1105-1112 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201361041105

Measuring student satisfaction with the quality of services offered by universities - Central European View

David Schüller, Martina Rašticová, Štěpán Konečný
Department of Management, Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Business and Management, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic

The study aims to determine whether the criteria for measuring the satisfaction of students with the quality of universities are identical in the following five selected countries of Central Europe - Czech Republic, Germany, Poland, Austria, and Slovakia. A focus group technique was carried out at the first stage to identify possible factors (criteria) for measuring the quality of the services offered by university as perceived by students. Next, a questionnaire was designed to determine the key factors and their relevance for measuring the satisfaction of students. The result of the analysis of variance implies that the set of criteria is perceived in much the same manner in the countries in question. It is, therefore, possible to unify the application of the set of criteria in the countries to measure student satisfaction with the quality of universities. Further research after this study will focus on creating a methodology for measuring student satisfaction with the quality of universities mainly in view of the dynamic development of and global increase in the competition between universities in tertiary education.

Keywords: measuring satisfaction, quality of services, universities, Central Europe

Received: February 28, 2013; Published: July 13, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Schüller, D., Rašticová, M., & Konečný, Š. (2013). Measuring student satisfaction with the quality of services offered by universities - Central European View. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis61(4), 1105-1112. doi: 10.11118/actaun201361041105
Download citation

References

  1. ASTIN, A. W. a ANTONIO, A. L., 2012: Assessment for excellence the philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. 2nd ed., Plymouth. United Kingdom: Rowman & Littlefield, p. 380. ISBN 10-1573565512.
  2. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, 2012: The world factbook. Retrieved from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2144.html.
  3. CUBILLO, J. M., SÁNCHES, J. and CERVIŃO, J., 2007: International students' decision-making process. International Journal of Educational Management, 20, 2: 101-105. ISSN 0951-354X. DOI: 10.1108/09513540610646091 Go to original source...
  4. CRONIN, J. J. and TAYLOR, S. A., 1992: Measuring service quality: A reexamination and extension. Journal of Marketing, 56, 3: 55-68. ISSN 1547-7185. DOI: 10.2307/1252296 Go to original source...
  5. DEARDEN, L., GOODMAN, A. and WYNESS, G., 2012: Higher education finance in the uk. Fiscal Studies, 33, 1: 73-105. ISSN 0143-5671. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-5890.2012.00153.x Go to original source...
  6. HOPKINS, P. and TODD, L., 2012: Occupying newcastle university: student resistance to government spending cuts in england. Geographical Journal, 178, 2: 104-109. ISSN 1475-4959. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2011.00436.x Go to original source...
  7. DOBBINS, M. and KNILL, C., 2009: Higher education policies in central and eastern europe: Convergence toward a common model? Governance, 22, 3: 397-430. ISSN 1468-0491. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01445.x. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01445.x Go to original source...
  8. DOUGLES, J., MC CLELLAND, R. and DAVIES, J., 2008: The development of a conceptual model of student satisfaction with their experience in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 16, 1: 19-35. ISSN 0968-4883. DOI: 10.1108/09684880810848396. DOI: 10.1108/09684880810848396 Go to original source...
  9. FIRDAUS, A., 2006: Measuring service quality in higher education: Hedperf versus servperf. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 24, 1: 31-47. ISSN 0263-4503. DOI: 10.1108/02634500610641543. DOI: 10.1108/02634500610641543 Go to original source...
  10. GARCÍA-ARACIL, A., 2008: European graduates' level of satisfaction with higher education. Higher Education, 57, 1: 1-21. ISSN 1573-174X. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-008-9121-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-008-9121-9 Go to original source...
  11. GBADOSAMI, G. a DE JAGER, J., 2010: Specific remedy for specific problem: measuring service quality in south african higher education. Higher Education., 60, 3: 251-267. ISSN 1573-174X. Go to original source...
  12. GRUBER, T., FUß, S., VOSS, R. and GLÄSER-ZIKUDA, M., 2010: Examining student satisfaction with higher education services: Using a new measurement tool. International Journal of Public Sector Management., 23, 2: 105-123. ISSN 0951-3558. DOI: 10.1108/09513551011022474. DOI: 10.1108/09513551011022474 Go to original source...
  13. HULÍK, V. a TESÁRKOVÁ, K., 2009: Dopady demografického vývoje na vzdělávací soustavu v České republice. Orbis Scholae, 3, 3: 7-23. ISSN 1802-4637. Go to original source...
  14. CHEN, S. H., 2009: A performance matrix for strategies to improve satisfaction among faculty members in higher education. QUALITY & QUANTITY, 45, 1: 75-89. ISSN 1573-7845. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-009-9291-2. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-009-9291-2 Go to original source...
  15. KEITH, R. J., 1960: The marketing revolution. Journal of Marketing., 24, 3: 35-38. ISSN 1547-7185. DOI: 10.2307/1248704 Go to original source...
  16. KOTLER, P., WONG, V., SANDRES, G. a ARMSTRONG, J., 2007: Moderní marketing., 4. vyd., Praha: Grada Publishing, 534-549. ISBN 978-80-247-1545-2.
  17. KULA, M., 2008: 'Ni_z zdziesia˛tkuje prywatne uczelnie w całej Polsce', Polska. The Times. August 12. Retrieved from http://www.polskatimes.pl/artykul/33757,niz-zdziesiatkuje-prywatne-uczelnie-w-calej-polsce,id,t.html.
  18. KWIEK, M., 2001: Social and cultural dimensions of the transformation of higher education in central and eastern europe. Higher Education in Europe, 26, 3: 309-410. ISSN 1469-8358. Retrieved from http://www.policy.hu/kwiek/Kwiek2.pdf. Go to original source...
  19. LAI, S. L. L., TO, W. M., LUNG, J. W. Y. and LAI, T. M., 2011: The perceived value of higher education: the voice of chinese students. Higher Education, 63, 3: 271-287. ISSN 1573-174X. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-011-9439-6. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-011-9439-6 Go to original source...
  20. LEVITT, T., 1960: Marketing myopia. Harvard Business Review, 38, 4: 45-56. ISSN 0017-8012.
  21. MERTOVA, P. and WEBSTER, L., 2009: The academic voice in english and czech higher education quality. Quality Assurance in Education, 17, 2: 140-155. ISSN 0968-4883. DOI: 10.1108/09684880910951363. DOI: 10.1108/09684880910951363 Go to original source...
  22. MUNTEANU, C., CEOBANU, C., BOBÂLCA, C. and ANTON, O., 2010: An analysis of customer satisfaction in a higher education context. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23, 2: 124-140. ISSN 0951-3558. DOI: 10.1108/09513551011022483. DOI: 10.1108/09513551011022483 Go to original source...
  23. PARASURAMAN, A., ZEITHAML, V. A. and BERRY, L., 1988: Servqual: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64, 1: 111-124. ISSN 0022-4359.
  24. PARKER, C. and MATHEWS, B. P., 2001: Customer satisfaction: contrasting academic and consumers' interpretations. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 19, 1: 38-44. ISSN 0263-4503. DOI: 10.1108/02634500110363790 Go to original source...
  25. PETERSON, R. A. and WILSON, W. R., 1992: Measuring customer satisfaction: fact and artifact. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science., 20, 1: 61-71. ISSN 0092-0703. DOI: 10.1007/BF02723476. DOI: 10.1007/BF02723476 Go to original source...
  26. RAMACHANDRAN, M. T., 2010: Marketing framework in higher education: Addressing aspirations of students beyond conventional tenets of selling products. International Journal of Educational Management, 24, 6: 544-556. ISSN 0951-354X. DOI: 10.1108/09513541011067700. DOI: 10.1108/09513541011067700 Go to original source...
  27. SANTIAGO, S., TREMBLAY, T., BASRI, E. and ARNAL, E., 2008: Tertiary education for the knowledge society, oecd thematic review of tertiary education: Synthesis report, 1. Lisbon: OECD, 30 p. ISBN 9264046526.
  28. SCOTT, P., 2002: Reflections on the reform of higher education in central and eastern europe. Higher Education in Europe, 27, 1-2: 137-152. ISSN 1469-8358. DOI: 10.1080/0379772022000003288. DOI: 10.1080/0379772022000003288 Go to original source...
  29. SENTHILKUMAR, N. and ARULRAJ, A., 2011: Sqm-hei - determination of service quality measurement of higher education in india. Journal of Modelling in Management, 6, 1: 60-78. ISSN 1746-5664. DOI: 10.1108/17465661111112502. DOI: 10.1108/17465661111112502 Go to original source...
  30. SOJKIN, B., BARTKOWIAK, P. and SKUZA, A., 2012: Determinants of higher education choices and student satisfaction: the case of poland. Higher Education, 63, 5: 565-581. ISSN 1573-174X. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-011-9459-2. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-011-9459-2 Go to original source...
  31. SRIKANTHAN, G. and DALRYMPLE, J. F., 2007: A conceptual overview of a holistic model for quality in higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 21, 3: 173-193. ISSN 0951-354X. DOI: 10.1108/09513540710738647 Go to original source...
  32. SVĚTLÍK, J., 2009: Marketingové řízení školy. Praha: Wolters Kluwer ČR, 213 s. ISBN 80-7357-176-5.
  33. VOSS, R., GRUBER, T., and SZMIGIN, I., 2007: Service quality in higher education: The role of student expectations. Journal of Business Research, 60, 9: 949-959. ISSN 0148-2963. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.020 Go to original source...
  34. WONG, M. K., 2004: From expansion to repositioning: Recent changes in higher education in hong kong. An International Journal, 2, 1: 150-166. ISSN 0219-8614. Go to original source...
  35. YANG, G., 2003: The Internet and the rise of a transnational Chinese cultural sphere. Media, Culture and Society, 25, 4: 469-490. ISSN 1460-3675. DOI: 10.1177/01634437030254003 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.