Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2013, 61(4), 923-933 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201361040923
Philanthropic behaviour and motives
- Department of Public Economics, Faculty od Economics and Administration, Masaryk University, Lipová 41a, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic
Even though philanthropy tends to be considered a sociological theme rather than an economic one, it poses a number of questions that challenge economists as well. We chose to address the following: How can economists contribute to the theories related to philanthropy? We examine some terms that are used in public economics theory and use them to explore the issues of philanthropy like Samaritan's Dilemma, the Prisoner's Dilemma, and the Free-Rider Problem, which we consider to be interesting and inspiring (Stone, 2008). We have to find and identify the social values of donors and volunteers rather than their economic values, because economists are not fully able to explain empathy, altruism, and helpful behaviour using traditional economic principles (Rutherford, 2008).
The theoretical frame is supported by relevant empirical data. Before starting a large-scale survey, we decided to conduct smaller pre-research probes into people's attitudes towards altruism, philanthropy, and giving. Even though our sample was not fully representative, the responses that we collected generated interesting findings about people's views and attitudes. The first wave of data was collected between February and April 2009; the second wave between February and April 2010.
Because of this pilot research mission and because of the budget restriction too, the non-representative sample of 823 respondents has been used; students of our Public Economics study programme were used as interviewers. They have also obtained a proper training of the professional sociologist.
Students utilized the face to face interviewing method; non-standardized questions were immediately recorded into the reply form. Questions were divided into three groups with typical characteristics. The first one focuses on personal (individual) motives for financial donating (only financial gifts for non-profit organizations). Second part examines the attitudes of individual towards the non-profit sector and its transparency, while the third part analyses the profile of particular groups of donors, which are stratified according to selected characteristics as age, field of activity, income level, etc.
This paper deals with the second group of questions. Because of the limited representativeness of the sample, the data are not linked to other observed socio-demographic characteristics and indicators (although we have collected them).
Currently we are working on similar, but fundamentally extended and representative survey. In this paper presented preliminary research should serve basically as a reference for identifying dominant donor strategies, motives and attitudes.
Keywords: philanthropy, charity, altruism, public economics, motivation, not-for-profit
Received: February 12, 2013; Published: July 13, 2013 Show citation
References
- ANDREONI, J., 1990: Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving. Economic Journal, 100, 401: 464-477. ISSN 0013-0133. DOI: 10.2307/2234133
Go to original source...
- BECKER, G. S., 1974: Theory of Social Interactions. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 6: 1063-1093. ISSN 0022-3808. DOI: 10.1086/260265
Go to original source...
- FRIČ, P. et al., 2001: Donation and voluntary activities in the Czech Republic. Prague: NROS and AGNES, p. 108. ISBN 80-902633-7-2.
- FRIČ, P., GOULLI, R., 2001: Nonprofit sector in the Czech Republic. Prague: Eurolex Bohemia, p. 203. ISBN 80-86432-04-1.
- FRIČ, P., DEVEROVÁ, L., PAJAS, P., ŠILHÁNOVÁ, H., 1998. Defining the Nonprofit Sector: The Czech Republic. Working Papers of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project, No. 27. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies, p. 22. ISBN 1-886333-32-7.
- RAPAPORT, A and CHAMMAH, A. M., 1965: Prisoner's Dilemma. Michigan: University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, p. 270.
- OLSON, M., 1965: The Logic of Collective Action. Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, p. 186.
- PHELPS, E. S., 1975: Altruism, morality, and economic theory. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, p. 246.
- RUTHERFORD, A., 2008: Get By With a Little Help From My Friends: A Recent History of Charitable Organizations in Economic Theory [on-line].
- SALAMON, L. M., 1987: Of Market Failure, Voluntary Failure and Third-Party Government: Toward a Theory of Government-Nonprofit Relations in the Modern Welfare-State. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 16, 1-2: 29-49. ISSN 0094-0607.
Go to original source...
- SCHAAD M., 1998: Non-profit-making organizations in economic theory. Development analysis and motivation for non-remunerated voluntary activities. Brno: Masaryk University, p. 244. ISBN 8021019719.
- SIMON, H. A., 1993: Altruism and Economics. The American Economic Review, 83, 2: 156-161. ISSN 0002-8282.
- STEM, 2004: Civil Society 2004. Final Report of the Representative Survey CIVICUS Civil Society Index. Prague: NROS, N/A.
- STONE, D., 2008: The Samaritan's Dilemma: Should Government Help Your Neighbour. New York: Nation Books, p. 304. ISBN 1568583540.
- SUGDEN, R., 1982: On the Economics of Philanthropy. Economic Journal, 92, 366: 341-350. ISSN 0013-0133. DOI: 10.2307/2232444
Go to original source...
- TITMUSS, R. M., 1970: The Gift Relationship: From Human Blood to Social Policy. London: New Press London, p. 360. ISBN 1-56584-403-3.
- WEISBROD, B. A., 1975: Toward a Theory of the Voluntary Non-profit Sector in a Three-Sector Economy. In: Phelps, E.S. (ed.): Altruism, Morality, and Economic Theory New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 171-195.
- WILSON, E. O., 1978: On Human nature. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, p. 272. ISBN 10-0674016386.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.