Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2013, 61(2), 345-352 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201361020345

Profit indicators in performance systems in the Czech companies

Jana Hornungová1, František Milichovský2
1 Department of Economics, Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Business and Management, Kolejní 4, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic
2 Department of Management, Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Business and Management, Kolejní 4, 612 00 Brno, Czech Republic

The main focus of the paper is the corporate performance measurement. At present, it is necessary to monitor this corporate performance and mostly try to improve it, because it could be very crucial competitive advantage in the market. The article provides an overview of key performance indicators (KPIs) in the companies. Based on the theoretical data there are applied statistical methods, which should be achieved of main aim of the paper. The main aim of the paper is to describe which groups of Key Performance Indicators are connected with corporate performance system of measurement in the area of Information and Communication Activities. To support this approach theoretical information from the area of Key Performance Indicators connected with data from primary research were used, focused on the performance evaluation of enterprises.
Successful companies are aware of the need for long-term strategic development, which is based on teamwork, respect of external environment and all subjects, which influence the business activities of the company directly or indirectly. It can be more effective to conceptualize relationship complete than limit to only consumer market and customer relations. Marketing moves more and more away from individual transaction orientation and rather focus on value creating relations, where the objective is to provide long-term stakeholder value. Day after day the company gets in touch with different groups of stakeholders, that influence the corporate development and it can not to access to these interest groups individually for reason of corporate limits. It is therefore necessary to define homogenous stakeholders groups, which are differ from each other in terms of their impact on business management. The authors of article put the question, which classification is the most statistical explaining the difference of stakeholders in term of evaluation their impact on business management. It was made cluster analysis for data mining including its graphic presentation through dendogram by statistical software IBM SPSS Statistics 20 to obtain relevant answer.

Keywords: performance, financial indicators, measurement, KPIs, Czech companies
Grants and funding:

This paper is supported by the Czech Science Foundation. Name of the Project: 'Construction of Methods for Multifactor Assessment of Company Complex Performance in Selected Sectors'. Registration No. P403/11/2085.

Received: January 28, 2013; Published: April 24, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hornungová, J., & Milichovský, F. (2013). Profit indicators in performance systems in the Czech companies. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis61(2), 345-352. doi: 10.11118/actaun201361020345
Download citation

References

  1. ASCHENBRENNEROVÁ, H., 2010: Měřením a řízením výkonnosti ke zvyšování konkurenceschopnosti malých a středních průmyslových podniků v období globální finanční krize. Časopis Úspěch - produktivita a inovace v souvislostech, 1/2010: Výrobní systémy pro 21. Století, 2010.
  2. BUDÍKOVÁ, M., LERCH, T., MIKOLÁŠ, Š., 2005: Základní statistické metody. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, 170 s., ISBN 8021038861.
  3. ECKERSON, W. W., 2009: Performance Management Strategies. Business Intelligence Journal, 14(1): 24-27.
  4. FRANCESCHINI, F., GALETTO, M., MAISANO, D., 2007: Management by measurement: designing key indicators and performance measurement systems, Springer Verlag, p. 242, ISBN 978-3-540-73211-2.
  5. GABČANOVÁ, I., 2012: Human Resources Key Performance Indicators. Journal of Competitiveness, 4(1): 117-128. Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.7441/joc.2012.01.09. DOI: 10.7441/joc.2012.01.09 Go to original source...
  6. HEBÁK, P., HUSTOPECKÝ, J., 1987: Vícerozměrné statistické metody s aplikacemi. Praha: SNTL, 452 s.
  7. HŘEBÍČEK, J., SOUKOPOVÁ, J., ŠTENCL, M., TRENZ, O., 2011: Integration of economic, environmental, social and corporate governance performance and reporting in enterprises. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 59(7): 157-166. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201159070157 Go to original source...
  8. KAPLAN, R. S., NORTON, D., 1992: The Balanced Scorecard measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1): 71-79.
  9. KERZNER, H., 2011: Project Management Metrics, KPIs, and Dashboards: A Guide to Measuring and Monitoring Project Performance, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, p. 372, ISBN 978-1-118-02652-6. Go to original source...
  10. KOCMANOVÁ, A., DOČEKALOVÁ, M., 2011: Corporate sustainability: environmental, social, economic and corporate performance. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 59(7): 203-208. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201159070203 Go to original source...
  11. KOCMANOVÁ, A., HORNUNGOVÁ, J., KLÍMKOVÁ, M., 2010: Udržitelnost: Integrace environmentální, sociální a ekonomické výkonnosti podniku. Brno: Akademické nakladatelství CERM, 125 s., ISBN 978-80-7204-744-4.
  12. KOLEŇÁK, J., KOLEŇÁKOVÁ, L., 2012: Je synergie cestou ke zvýšení hodnoty podniku? Scientia & Societas, 8(3): 128-138, ISSN 1801-7118.
  13. LEBAS, M. J., 1995: Performance measurement and performance management. International Journal of Production Economics, 41(1): 23-35. DOI: 10.1016/0925-5273(95)00081-X Go to original source...
  14. LIMA, E. P., COSTA, S. E. G., ANGELIS, J. J., 2009: Strategic performance measurement systems: a discussion about their roles. Measuring Business Excellence, 13(3): 39-49. Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13683040910984310. DOI: 10.1108/13683040910984310 Go to original source...
  15. MARIA, B., 2009: Information System for Modeling Economic and Financial Performances. Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Science Series, 18(4): 902907.
  16. MARINIČ, P., 2008: Plánování a tvorba hodnoty firmy. Praha: Grada Publishing, 232 s., ISBN 9788024724324.
  17. MILICHOVSKÝ, F., ŠIMBEROVÁ, I., 2011: Signification of marketing effectiveness in industry. In: International Scientific Conference Whither Our Economies, 1(1): 98-103.
  18. MILICHOVSKÝ, F., SOLČANSKÝ, M., SYCHROVÁ, L., 2011: Přístupy k měření efektivnosti marketingových činnost. Trendy Ekonomiky a Managementu, 5(8): 131-138.
  19. MUCHIRI, P. N., PINTELON, L., MARTIN, H., DE MEYER, A.-M., 2010: Empirical analysis of maintenance performance measurement in Belgian industries. International Journal of Production Research, 48(20): 5905-5924. DOI: 10.1080/00207540903160766 Go to original source...
  20. PARMENTER, D., 2010: Key performance indicators: developing, implementing, and using winning KPIs. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, p. 299, ISBN 978-0-470-54515-7.
  21. ŘEZANKOVÁ, H., HÚSEK, D., SNÁŠEL, V., 2007: Shluková analýza dat. Praha: Professional Publishing, 196 s., ISBN 978-80-86946-26-9.
  22. SAMSONOWA, T., BUXMANN, P., GERTEIS, W., 2009: Defining KPI Sets for Industrial Research Organizations - A Performance Measurement Approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(2): 157-176. DOI: 10.1142/S1363919609002248 Go to original source...
  23. SMITH, D. A., 2008: Implementing Indicators fort IT Service Management. Van Haren Publishing.
  24. ŠIMBEROVÁ, I., 2010: Company strategic marketing management - synergic approach and value creating. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 58(6): 543-552. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201058060543 Go to original source...
  25. WU, H.-Y., 2012: Constructing a strategy map for banking institutions with key performance indicators of the balanced scorecard. Evaluation and Program Planning, 35(3): 303-320. Doi http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.11.009. DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.11.009 Go to original source...
  26. ZAHEREWATI, Z., MAHAZRIL, A. Y., ZURAINI, Y., NAZNI, N., MOHD ZOOL HILMIE, M. S., ZURIAWATI, Z., 2011: Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) in the Public Sector: A Study in Malaysia. Asian Social Science, 7(7): 102-107. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.