Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2012, 60(8), 299-306 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201260080299

Fundamental phenomenological categories of garden and landscape

Marie Zgarbová
Ústav zahradní a krajinářské architektury, Mendelova univerzita v Brně, Valtická 337, 691 44 Lednice, Czech Republic

The current scientific methods describing gardens and landscapes all over the world are not always sufficient for the purpose of deep understanding of specific and close relations between landscape/garden and its inhabitants/visitors. A new dimension of qualitative investigation of these phenomena and relations between humans and the environment, as distinguished from the common mechanistic methods, has to be acquired. While a systematic anti-mechanistic research on the interaction of humans and living space is carried out especially in the United Kingdom and the United States, Continental Europe persist mechanistic in its core.
In Continental Europe phenomenology as well as hermeneutics are regarded mostly as the particular areas of abstract philosophical studies that do not refer enough to practical sciences such as, for example, garden and landscape architecture. However, there are some especially transatlantic centres of applied phenomenological research. This article examines the phenomenological and hermeneutical approach as it might be used to explore the specific field of garden and landscape issues. In the first step, the nature of hermeneutics and phenomenology as compared to the common mechanistic scientific methods is discussed and the parallels between hermeneutics and phenomenology are outlined. Then, using the phenomenological method helps we give evidence on the fundamental categories of garden and landscape. These categories, in contrast to mechanistic constructions, represent garden and landscape as they are intimately experienced by humans. The focus of this research is both methodological (it is an effort to articulate a method alternative to the objectivity and abstraction of strict science, to be used in the field of garden and landscape architecture and related areas) and hermeneutical (it is an effort to achieve a deeper and profound understanding of garden and landscape as the irreplaceable base for every responsible interaction, whether scientific, creative, or other, with garden and landscape).

Keywords: phenomenology, hermeneutics, landscape architecture, intimate environmental experience, being-in-landscape, living-with-landscape, togetherness
Grants and funding:

The paper was supported by project DF11P01OVV019 "Methods and tools of landscape architecture for territorial development", meeting the topic priority TP 1.4. of the Program of Applied Research and Development of National and Cultural Identity, financed by the Ministry of Culture of the Czech Republic.

Received: September 13, 2012; Published: March 30, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Zgarbová, M. (2012). Fundamental phenomenological categories of garden and landscape. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis60(8), 299-306. doi: 10.11118/actaun201260080299
Download citation

References

  1. BARBARAS, R., 2005: Touha a odstup (Úvod do fenomenologie vnímání). OIKOYMENH, Praha. ISBN 80-7298-137-4.
  2. BLECHA, I., 2007: Proměny fenomenologie: úvod do Husserlovy filosofie. Triton, Praha. ISBN 978-80-7254-938-2.
  3. FORMAN, T. T., GODRON, M., 1993: Krajinná ekologie. Academia, Praha. ISBN 80-200-0464-5.
  4. GRONDIN, J., 1997: Úvod do hermeneutiky. OIKOYMENH, Praha. ISBN 80-86005-43-7.
  5. HEIDEGGER, M., 2006: Básnicky bydlí člověk. OIKOYMENH, Praha. ISBN 80-7298-167-6.
  6. HEIDEGGER, M., 2008: Bytí a čas. OIKOYMENH, Praha. SBN 978-80-7298-048-3.
  7. HROCH, J. et al., 2010: Pragmatismus a dekonstrukce v anglo-americké filozofii. Paido, Brno. ISBN 978-80-7315-205-5.
  8. HUSSERL, E., 1972: Edmund Husserl: Krize evropských věd a transcendentální fenomenologie. Academia, Praha. ISBN 80-200-0561-7.
  9. HUSSERL, E., 2001: Idea fenomenologie. OIKOYMENH, Praha. ISBN 80-7298-023-8.
  10. KRATOCHVÍL, Z., 1994: Filosofie ľivé přírody. Herrmann a synové, Praha.
  11. KUHN, T. S., 1997: Struktura vědeckých revolucí. OIKOYMENH, Praha. ISBN 80-86005-54-2.
  12. MORAVEC, J. et al., 1994: Fytocenologie. Academia, Praha. ISBN 80-200-0457-2.
  13. NORBERG-SCHULZ, CH., 1994: Genius loci: K fenomenologii architektury. Odeon, Praha. ISBN 978-80-7363-303-5.
  14. NOVOTNÝ, J., 2006: Krajina, řeč a otevřenost bytí. Studie k Heideggerovu existenciálnímu pojetí prostorovosti. UK FHS, Praha. ISBN 80-239-8972-3.
  15. PATOČKA, J., 2008: Fenomenologické spisy I. Přirozený svět. OIKOYMENH, Praha. ISBN 978-80-7298-307-0.
  16. POPPER, K. R., 2008: Bída historicismu. OIKOYMENH, Praha. ISBN 80-86005-80-1.
  17. REZEK, P., 2009: Architektonika a protoarchitektura. Filosofia, Praha. ISBN 978-80-903898-3-0.
  18. SKLENIČKA, P., 2003: Základy krajinného plánování. Praha.
  19. SEAMON, D., 2000: A Way of Seeing People and Place: Phenomenology in Environment-Behavior Research. In: S. Wapner, J. Demick, T. Yamamoto, and H Minami (Eds.), Theoretical Perspectives in Environment-Behavior Research (pp. 157-78). New York: Plenum. Go to original source...
  20. ©MAJS, J., 1998: The Threatened Culture: From Evolutionary Ontology to Ecological Politics. Dobromysl & Slovacontact, Praha. ISBN 80-605891-503-8.
  21. ©MAJS, J., 2003: Filosofie psaná kurzívou. Nakladatelství Doplněk., Brno. ISBN 80-7239-152-6.
  22. VEHSE, CH. T., 2006: From Outside-In to Inside-Out: Rethinking The Two Cultures and the Contribution of C. P. Snow. [online]. The Forum on Public Policy, No. 1, [retrieved 2012-05-07]..

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.