Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2012, 60(7), 315-328 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201260070315

Economic results of agricultural enterprises in 2010

F. Střeleček, Daniel Kopta, Jana Lososová, Radek Zdeněk
Katedra účetnictví a financí, Ekonomická fakulta, Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích, Studentská 13, 370 05 České Budějovice, Česká republika

The paper analyses the development of economic measures on a sample of agricultural enterprises in the Czech Republic in 2006-2010. These enterprises were divided according to the share of the land in the LFA. The aim of the paper is to describe current economic state of agricultural enterprises and to define long-term tendencies of the profit/loss and of factors that can influence it. Compared to 2009, the situation of agricultural enterprises improved in 2010, the majority of enterprises reached a profit, however the profit was not at the same level as in 2007 and 2008. Primarily, total production after its considerable decline in 2009 increased only slightly and reached a level of 2006 in the average enterprise. The labour productivity increased due to a reduction of the number of workers. Decreasing the number of workers is a long term trend as well as increasing of financial support in agriculture. However, the growth rate of support is slowing; the non-LFA support has been decreased in last two years. The increasing share of revenues from crop production and reducing the share of revenue from livestock production is also a long-term tendency.

Keywords: profit/loss, profit rate, labour productivity, subsidies, LFA, NON-LFA
Grants and funding:

This study was supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic, research project No. MSM 6007665806.

Received: June 1, 2012; Published: July 2, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Střeleček, F., Kopta, D., Lososová, J., & Zdeněk, R. (2012). Economic results of agricultural enterprises in 2010. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis60(7), 315-328. doi: 10.11118/actaun201260070315
Download citation

References

  1. ACS, S., HANLEY, N., DALLIMER, M., GASTON, K. J., ROBERTSON, P., WILSON, P. and ARMSWORTH, P. R., 2010: The effect of decoupling on marginal agricultural systems: Implications for farm incomes, land use and upland ecology. Land Use Policy 27, 2010: 550-563. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.07.009 Go to original source...
  2. BALLAS, D., CLARKE, G. P. and WIEMERS, E., 2006: Spatial microsimulation for rural policy analysis in Ireland: the implications of CAP reforms for the national spatial strategy. Journal of Rural Studies 22, 2006: 367-378. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.01.002 Go to original source...
  3. BAŠEK, V. and KRAUS, J., 2011: Comparison of selected indicators of farms in the EU member states. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 57 (2): 71-84. Go to original source...
  4. BEARD, N. and SWINBANK, A., 2001: Decoupled payments to facilitate CAP reform. Food Policy, 26 (2): 121-145. DOI: 10.1016/S0306-9192(00)00041-5 Go to original source...
  5. BENJAMIN, C., LE ROUX, Y. and PHIMISTER, E., 2006: Direct payments versus interest rate subsidies to new farmers: a simulation analysis of alternative farm set-up policies in France. Land Use Policy, 23 (3): 311-322. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.08.001 Go to original source...
  6. BERGER, G., KAECHELE, H. and PFEFFER, H., 2006: The greening of the European common agricultural policy by linking the European-wide obligation of set-aside with voluntary agri-environmental measures on a regional scale. Environmental Science & Policy 9, 509-524. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2006.05.006 Go to original source...
  7. BREUSTEDT, G. and GLAUBEN, T., 2007: Driving forces behind exiting from farming in Western Europe. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 58: 115-127. DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2007.00082.x Go to original source...
  8. BROŽOVÁ, I., 2011: The economic performance analysis of organic farms in the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 57 (5): 240-246. DOI: 10.17221/39/2011-AGRICECON Go to original source...
  9. COCHRANE, W. W., 1979: The Development of American Agriculture: A Historical Analysis. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis. pp: 464, ISBN: 9780816609260.
  10. CZECH STATISTICAL OFFICE, 2010: Economic Accounts for Agriculture - preliminary results for 2010. (on-line). Available at http://www.czso.cz/csu/2011edicniplan.nsf/p/2115-11 (cit. 2010-09-5).
  11. DIVILA, E. and SOKOL, Z., 1999: Problémy klasifikace a třídění zemědělských podniků. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 45 (10): 459-466.
  12. DONALDSON, A. B., FLICHMAN, G. and WEBSTER, J. P. G., 1995: Integrating Agronomic and Economic Models for Policy Analysis at the Farm Level: the Impact of CAP Reform in Two European Regions. Agricultural Systems, 48 (2): 163-178. DOI: 10.1016/0308-521X(94)00009-G Go to original source...
  13. FORSTNER, B. and ISERMEYER, F., 1998: Interim results of the restructuring of agriculture in eastern Germany. Berichte uber Landwirtschaft, 76 (2): 161-190.
  14. GLAUBEN, T., TIETJE, H. and WEISS, C., 2006: Agriculture on the move: exploring regional differences in farm exit rates in western Germany. Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft 26, 103-118. DOI: 10.1007/s10037-004-0062-1 Go to original source...
  15. GRZNÁR, M. and SZABO, L., 2008: Prosperity factors of agricultural companies in the SR in the LFA after the EU integration. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 54 (10): 461-466. Go to original source...
  16. IRAIZOZ, B., GORTON, M. and DAVIDOVA, S., 2007: Segmenting farms for analysing agricultural trajectories: A case study of the Navarra regionin Spain. Agricultural Systems, 93 (2007) 143-169. DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2006.05.002 Go to original source...
  17. KOPTA, D., 2009: Possibilities of financial health indicators used for prediction of future development of agricultural enterprises. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 55 (3): 111-125. DOI: 10.17221/589-AGRICECON Go to original source...
  18. LATRUFFE, L. and DAVIDOVA, S., 2007: Common Agricultural Policy direct payments and distributional conflicts over rented land within corporate farms in the New Member States. Land Use Policy, 24 (2): 451-457. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2006.06.003 Go to original source...
  19. MIKLOVIČOVÁ, J. and GURČÍK, Ľ., 2009: The profit and added value creation and development analysis of agricultural companies in selected regions in Slovakia. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 55 (8): 392-399. DOI: 10.17221/44/2009-AGRICECON Go to original source...
  20. MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC, 2011: Zemědělství 2010. (on-line) Available at http://eagri.cz/public/web/file/129137/Zemedelstvi_2010.pdf (cit. 2011-09-5).
  21. OFFERMANN, F., NIEBERG, H. and ZANDER, K., 2009: Dependency of organic farms on direct payments in selected EU member states: Today and tomorrow. Food Policy, 34, (2009): 273-279. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2009.03.002 Go to original source...
  22. PIORR, A., UNGARO, F., CIANCAGLINI, A., HAPPE, K., SAHRBACHER, A., SATTLER, C., UTHES, S. and ZANDER, P., 2009: Integrated assessment of future CAP policies: land use changes, spatial patterns and targeting. Environmental Science & Policy, 12: 1112-1136. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.01.001 Go to original source...
  23. RIVEIRO, J. A., MAREY, M. F., MARCO, J. L. and ALVAREZ, C. J., 2008: Procedure for the classification and characterization of farms for agricultural production planning: Application in the Northwest of Spain. Computers and electronics in agriculture, 61 (2008): 169-178. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2007.11.003 Go to original source...
  24. ŠTOLBOVÁ, M., 2007: Comparative analysis of less-favoured areas payments in the EU states. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 53 (10): 455-465. DOI: 10.17221/1220-AGRICECON Go to original source...
  25. ŠTOLBOVÁ, M., 2008: Eligibility criteria for less-favoured areas payments in the EU countries and the position of the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 54 (4): 166-175. DOI: 10.17221/293-AGRICECON Go to original source...
  26. ŠTOLBOVÁ, M. and HLAVSA, T., 2008: The impact of the LFA payments on the FADN farms in the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 54 (10): 489-497. DOI: 10.17221/275-AGRICECON Go to original source...
  27. ŠTOLBOVÁ, M., HLAVSA, T. and MAUR, P., 2008: Impact of LFA payments on economics results of farms and proposal on rates differentiation. Praha: VÚZE, 2008. Study No. 89; ISBN 978-80-86671-50-5.
  28. STŘELEČEK, F. and LOSOSOVÁ, J., 2005: Economic impact of several variants of additional direct payments for 2005 and 2006 years on the Czech economy. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 51 (3): 93-111. Go to original source...
  29. STŘELEČEK, F., LOSOSOVÁ, J., and ZDENĚK, R., 2007: Economic results of agricultural enterprises in 2005. Agricultural Economics - Czech, 53 (5): 201-216. Go to original source...
  30. STŘELEČEK, F., LOSOSOVÁ, J. and ZDENĚK, R., 2008: Economic results of agricultural holdings in less favoured areas. Agricultural Economics - Czech. 54 (11): 510-520. Go to original source...
  31. STŘELEČEK, F., LOSOSOVÁ, J. and ZDENĚK, R., 2011: Economic results of agricultural enterprises in 2009. Agricultural Economics - Czech. 57 (3): 103-117. Go to original source...
  32. UTHES, S., PIORR, A., ZANDER, P., BIENKOWSKI, J., UNGARO, F., DALGAARD, T., STOLZE, M., MOSCHITZ, H., SCHADER, CH., HAPPE, K., SAHRBACHER, A., DAMGAARD, M., TOUSSAINT, V., SATTLER, C., REINHARDT, F-J., KJELDSEN, CH., CASINI, L. and MÜLLER, K., 2011: Regional impacts of abolishing direct payments: An integrated analysis in four European regions. Agricultural Systems 104 (2011): 110-121. DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2010.07.003 Go to original source...
  33. ZIMMERMANN, A., HECKELEI, T. and DOMÍNGUEZ, I. P., 2009: Modelling farm structural change for integrated ex-ante assessment: review of methods and determinants. Environmental Science & Policy 12, 601-618. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.01.014 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.