Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2011, 59(4), 355-362 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201159040355

Analysis of the financial performance of enterprises based in the Vysočina Region

Ladislav Šiška
Katedra ekonomických studií, Vysoká škola polytechnická Jihlava, Tolstého 16, 586 01 Jihlava, Česká republika

The subject of this article lies in the analysis of the financial performance of 481 enterprises with more than 20 employees based in the Vysočina Region. The analysis was carried out on the basis of publicly available data for the period of 2006-2008. The comparison used adjusted average values of ROS and sales growth for the years specified above. The results indicate differences between industrial sectors, as well as between the districts of the Vysočina Region. Financially well-performing agricultural enterprises are mostly located in the Region of Pelhřimov, while successful industrial enterprises tend to be based in the Districts of Žďár nad Sázavou and Havlíčkův Brod. On the other hand, construction companies are most successful in the Districts of Pelhřimov and Jihlava.

Keywords: financial analysis, performance measurement, profitability, growth
Grants and funding:

This article is part of the solution of Project No. 402/09/2057 financed by the Czech Science Foundation of the Czech Republic.

Received: March 8, 2011; Published: May 29, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Šiška, L. (2011). Analysis of the financial performance of enterprises based in the Vysočina Region. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis59(4), 355-362. doi: 10.11118/actaun201159040355
Download citation

References

  1. HULT, G. T. M. et al., 2008: An assement of the measurement of performance in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 39, p. 1064-1080. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400398 Go to original source...
  2. KAPLAN, R. S., NORTON, D. P., 2004: Strategy maps: converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Boston (Mass.), Harvard Business School, 2004. ISBN 1591391342.
  3. MARCH, J. G., 1991: Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, Vol. 2, No. 1, Special Issue: Organizational Learning, p. 71-87. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 Go to original source...
  4. SIMSEK, Z., HEAVEY, C., VEIGA J. F., SOUDER, 2009: A Typology for Aligning Organizational Ambidexterity's Conceptualizations, Antecedents, and Outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 46, No. 5, p. 864-894. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00841.x Go to original source...
  5. UOTILA, J., MAULA, M., KEIL, T. and ZAHRA, S., 2009: Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 30, p. 221-231. DOI: 10.1002/smj.738 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.