Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2010, 58(6), 199-208 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201058060199

Moderní metody hodnocení stávajících dodavatelů a dodavatelů vybraných zákazníkem pro malé a střední podniky

Marie Jurová, Ekaterina Sutormina
Ústav managementu, Vysoké učení technické v Brně, Kolejní 2906/4, 612 00 Brno, Česká republika

Cílem tohoto příspěvku je vytvoření alternativní metody hodnocení dodavatelů s ohledem na vlastnosti malého a středního podnikání. Byly prozkoumány různé názory výběru hodnoticích kritéria jako fuzzy logika, klastrová metoda, environmentální management atd. Byly prozkoumány různé varianty procedury výběru, jako jsou hodnocení založené na kvalitě, formovaní sítě souvislostí mezi faktory, srovnání ve dvojících, použití genetického algoritmu. Byly určeny hodnoticí skupiny a hodnoticí kritéria se souvisejícími vzorci výpočtu. Použitý systém hodnocení je zatím na teoretické úrovni. Zveřejnění praktického ověření metody se uskuteční v prvním pololetí roku 2011.

proces hodnocení, malé a střední podniky, vybraný dodavatel, existující dodavatel, SCM (Supply Chain Management)

Modern methods of evaluation existing suppliers and suppliers selected by customer for small and medium-sized companies

On existing conditions on global market (almost identical quality, almost identical purchasing values) companies have to definite the total rating of importance of evaluative criteria. In post-crisis period the problem of suppliers' evaluation is one of the biggest, because companies had to use all resources and all possibilities to develop their own business. Many authors wrote about collaborative planning and warehousing as one of possibilities to optimization work inside supply chain. For this paper define small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) as enterprises with the size of maximum 250 employers.
In literature was read we couldn't find information about own system of suppliers evaluation for small and medium-sized enterprises.
SME can have some different types of business and in this case need the universal system of evaluation. The research of this paper is oriented on small and medium-sized enterprises with different types of business. The new theoretical universal method of calculation for evaluation existing suppliers for small and medium-sized enterprises will present in this paper. This theoretical method is based on average values. This method includes traditional evaluative criteria (quality, delivery time) and other (mobility of supplier, possibilities of new level of partnership). This method of evaluation can not be used for continual manufacture. New method can improve the total evaluation of supplier in small and medium-sized enterprises.

Keywords: evaluation procedure, small and medium-sized enterprises, selected bidder, existing supplier SCM (Supply Chain Management)

Received: August 31, 2010; Published: July 17, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Jurová, M., & Sutormina, E. (2010). Modern methods of evaluation existing suppliers and suppliers selected by customer for small and medium-sized companies. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 58(6), 199-208. doi: 10.11118/actaun201058060199
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. ANJALI AWASTHI, SATYAVEERS, CHAUHAN, S. K. GOYAL, 2010: A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers. International Journal of Production Economics. Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc., (2010) 370-378. ISSN 0925-5273. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.04.029 Go to original source...
    2. AOUAM, T., CHANG, S. I., LEE, E. S., 2003: Fuzzy MADM: an outranking method. European Journal of Operational Research. Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc., 145, 317-328. ISSN 0377-2217. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00537-4 Go to original source...
    3. ASHUTOSH SARKARA, PRATAP, K. J. MOHAPATRAB, 2006: Evaluation of supplier capability and performance: A method for supply base reduction Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management. Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc., 12 (2006), 148-163. ISSN 1478-4092. DOI: 10.1016/j.pursup.2006.08.003 Go to original source...
    4. CEYHUN ARAZ, IREM OZKARAHAN, 2006: Supplier evaluation and management system for strategic sourcing based on a new multicriteria sorting procedure. International Journal of Production Economics. Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc. Volume 106, Issue 2, April 2007 585-606. ISSN 0925-5273. Go to original source...
    5. CHE, Z. H., WANG, H. S., 2008: Supplier selection and supply quantity allocation of common and non-common parts with multiple criteria under multiple products. Computers and Industrial Engineering, Pergamon Press, Inc. Tarrytown, NY, USA, Volume 55, Issue 1 (August 2008) 110-133. ISSN 0360-8352. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2007.12.005 Go to original source...
    6. CELEBI, D., BAYRAKTAR, D., 2007: An integrated neural network and data envelopment analysis for supplier evaluation under incomplete information. Expert Systems with Applications. Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc., Volume 35, Issue 4 (November 2008), 1698-1710. ISSN 0957-4174. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.107 Go to original source...
    7. CHEN, S. H., 1985: Ranking fuzzy numbers with maximizing set and minimizing set. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, NORTH-HOLLAND, 17 (2), 113-129. ISSN 0165-0114. DOI: 10.1016/0165-0114(85)90050-8 Go to original source...
    8. CHENG, C., LIN, Y., 2002: Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation. European Journal of Operational Journal, Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc, 142, 174-186. ISSN 0377-2217. Go to original source...
    9. DE BOER, L., LABRO, E., MORLACCHI, P., 2001: A review of methods supporting supplier selection. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc., 7, 75-89. ISSN 1478-4092. DOI: 10.1016/S0969-7012(00)00028-9 Go to original source...
    10. DICKSON, G. W., 1966: An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. Journal Purchasing, 2 (1), 28-41. ISSN 00224030. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-493X.1966.tb00818.x Go to original source...
    11. HOLGER SCHIELE, 2006: How to distinguish innovative suppliers? Identifying innovative suppliers as new task for purchasing. Industrial Marketing Management, Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc., Volume 35, Issue 8, November 2006, 925-935. ISSN 0019-8501. Go to original source...
    12. HUMPHREYS, P., MCIVOR, R., CHAN, F., 2003: Using case-based reasoning to evaluate supplier environmental management performance. Expert Systems with Applications, Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc., 25, 141-153. ISSN 0957-4174. DOI: 10.1016/S0957-4174(03)00042-3 Go to original source...
    13. KAHRAMAN, C., CEBECI, U., ULUKAN, Z., 2003: Multi criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logistics Information Management, Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc., 16 (6), 382-394. ISSN 0957-6053. DOI: 10.1108/09576050310503367 Go to original source...
    14. JAFAR RAZMI, HAMED RAFIEI, MAHDI HASHEMI, 2009: Designing a decision support system to evaluate and select suppliers using fuzzy analytic network process. Computers and Industrial Engineering, Pergamon Press, Inc. Tarrytown, NY, USA, Volume 57, Issue 4 (November 2009), 1282-1290. ISSN 0360-8352. Go to original source...
    15. JUROVÁ, M., SUTORMINA, E., 2010: The universal evaluation of new suppliers for small and medium-sized companies Ekonomika a management organizací: výzkum, výuka a praxe. Recenzovaný sborník příspěvků mezinárodní vědecké konference. 1. vydání. Masarykova univerzita, 2010 Ekonomicko-správní fakulta, Katedra podnikového hospodářství, 146-157. ISBN 978-80-210-5273-4.
    16. MING-HUNG SHU A, HSIEN-CHUNG WUB, 2009: Quality-based supplier selection and evaluation using fuzzy data. Computers and Industrial Engineering, Pergamon Press, Inc. Tarrytown, NY, USA Volume 57, Issue 3 (October 2009), 1072-1079. ISSN 0360-8352. Go to original source...
    17. RAJ, P. A., KUMAR, D. N., 1998: Ranking multi criteria river basin planning alternatives using fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, NORTH-HOLLAND, 100, 89-99. ISSN 0165-0114. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00091-2 Go to original source...
    18. RAJ, P. A., KUMAR, D. N., 1999: Ranking alternatives with fuzzy weights using maximizing set and minimizing set. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, NORTH-HOLLAND, 105, 365-375. ISSN 0165-0114. Go to original source...
    19. VERMA, R., PULLMAN, M. E., 1998: An analysis of the supplier selection process. Omega International Journal of Management Science, Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc., 26 (6), 739-750. ISSN 0305-0483. DOI: 10.1016/S0305-0483(98)00023-1 Go to original source...
    20. WEBER, C. A., CURRENT, J. R., BENTON, W. C., 1991: Vendor selection criteria and methods. European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc., 50, 2-18. ISSN 0377-2217. DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(91)90033-R Go to original source...
    21. YUAN, Y., 1991: Criteria for evaluation fuzzy ranking methods. Fuzzy Set and Systems, NORTH-HOLLAND, 43 (2), 139-157. ISSN 0165-0114. DOI: 10.1016/0165-0114(91)90073-Y Go to original source...
    22. ZADEH, L. A., 1999: From computing with numbers to computing with words-from manipulation of measurements to manipulation of perceptions. IEEE Transactions on Circuit and Systems-I: Fundamental Theory and Applications, IEEE Circuits and Systems Society, 45 (1), 105-119. ISSN 1057-7122. DOI: 10.1109/81.739259 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content