Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2019, 67(6), 1535-1540 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201967061535

Data Envelopment Analysis Models in Non-Homogeneous Environment

Josef Jablonskż
Department of Econometrics, Faculty of Informatics and Statistics, University of Economics, Prague, W. Churchill Sq. 4, 13067 Praha 3, Czech Republic

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a non-parametric method that is widely used for relative efficiency and performance evaluation of the set of decision-making units (DMUs). It is based on maximization of a weighted sum of outputs produced by the unit under evaluation divided by the weighted sum of inputs of the same unit, and the assumption that this ratio for all other units has to be lower or equal to 1. An important assumption for applications of DEA models is the homogeneity of the units. Unfortunately, the homogeneity assumption is not fulfilled in many real applications. The paper deals with the analysis of efficiency using DEA models in the non-homogeneous environment. One of the problems lies in non-homogeneous outputs. In this case, the units under evaluation spend the same inputs but produce completely or at least partly different set of outputs. The paper formulates several models how to deal with this problem and compares the results on a numerical example. Other main sources of non-homogeneity are discussed as an excellent possible starting point for future research.

Keywords: data envelopment analysis, non-homogeneous units, missing data, efficiency, performance
Grants and funding:

The research is supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic, project No. 19-08985S - Models for efficiency and performance evaluation in non-homogeneous economic environment.

Received: June 3, 2019; Accepted: September 9, 2019; Published: December 22, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Jablonskż, J. (2019). Data Envelopment Analysis Models in Non-Homogeneous Environment. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis67(6), 1535-1540. doi: 10.11118/actaun201967061535
Download citation

References

  1. ANDERSEN, P. and PETERSEN, N. C. 1993. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 39(10): 1261-1264. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1261 Go to original source...
  2. BANKER, R. D., CHARNES, A. and COOPER, W. W. 1984. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9): 1078-1092. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078 Go to original source...
  3. BARAT, M., TOHIDI, G. and SANEI, M. 2018. DEA for nonhomogeneous mixed networks. Asia Pacific Management Review, 24(2): 161-166. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmrv.2018.02.003 Go to original source...
  4. CASTELLI, L., PESENTI, R. and UKOVICH, W. 2001. DEA-like models for efficiency evaluations of specialized and interdependent units. European Journal of Operational Research, 132(2): 274-286. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00151-X Go to original source...
  5. CASTELLI, L., PESENTI, R. and UKOVICH, W. 2004. DEA-like models for the efficiency evaluation of hierarchically structured units. European Journal of Operational Research, 154(2): 465-476. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00182-6 Go to original source...
  6. CHARNES, A., COOPER, W. W. and RHODES, E. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6): 429-444. DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8 Go to original source...
  7. CHEN, Y., WU, L. and LU, B. 2018. Data envelopment analysis procedure with two non-homogeneous DMU groups. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 29(4): 780-788. Go to original source...
  8. COOK, W. D., HARRISON, J., ROUSE, P. and ZHU, J. 2012. Relative Efficiency Measurement: The Problem of a Missing Output in a Subset of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 220(1): 79-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.01.022 Go to original source...
  9. COOK, W. D., HARRISON, J., IMANIRAD, R., ROUSE, P. and ZHU, J. 2013. Data envelopment analysis with nonhomogeneous DMUs. Operations Research, 61(3): 666-676. DOI: 10.1287/opre.2013.1173 Go to original source...
  10. DU, J., CHEN, Y. and HUO, J. 2015. DEA for non-homogenous parallel networks. Omega, 56(1): 122-132. DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2014.10.001 Go to original source...
  11. DYSON, R. G., ALLEN, R., CAMANHO, A. S. PODINOVSKI, V., SARRICO, C. S. and SHALE, E. A. 2001. Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 132(2): 245-259. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00149-1 Go to original source...
  12. HAAS, D. and MURPHY, F. 2003. Compensating for non-homogeneity in decision-making units in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 144(3): 530-544. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00139-X Go to original source...
  13. HUANG, C. W., CHIU, Y. H., TU, C. H., LUO, Z. Y. and WANG, Z. 2016. Using the non-homogeneous frontier two-stage DEA model to assess the efficiencies of expense utilization and operation of the Taiwanese hotel industry. International Transactions in Operational Research, 23(6): 1067-1087. DOI: 10.1111/itor.12180 Go to original source...
  14. IMANIRAD, R., COOK, W. D. and ZHU, J. 2013. Partial input to output impacts in DEA: Production considerations and resource sharing among business subunits. Naval Research Logistics, 60(3): 190-207. DOI: 10.1002/nav.21528 Go to original source...
  15. KAO, C. and HWANG, S. N. 2008. Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research, 185(1): 418-429. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.11.041 Go to original source...
  16. LI, W. H., LIANG, L., COOK, W. D. and ZHU, J. 2016. DEA models for non-homogeneous DMUs with different input configurations. European Journal of Operational Research, 254(3): 946-956. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.04.063 Go to original source...
  17. LI, Y., LEI, X. and MORTON, A. 2018. Performance evaluation of nonhomogeneous hospitals: The case of Hong Kong hospitals. Health Care Management Science, 22(2): 215-228. DOI: 10.1007/s10729-018-9433-y Go to original source...
  18. SAEN, R. F., MEMARIANI, A. and LOTFI, F. H. 2005. Determining relative efficiency of slightly non-homogeneous decision making units by data envelopment analysis: a case study in IROST. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 165(2): 313-328. DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2004.04.050 Go to original source...
  19. SINGH, S. and RANJAN, P. 2018. Efficiency analysis of non-homogeneous parallel sub-unit systems for the performance measurement of higher education. Annals of Operations Research, 269(1-2): 641-666. DOI: 10.1007/s10479-017-2586-0 Go to original source...
  20. SUN, J., WANG, C., JI, X. and WU, J. 2017. Performance evaluation of heterogeneous bank supply chain systems from the perspective of measurement and decomposition. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 113: 891-903. DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2017.05.028 Go to original source...
  21. ZHA, Y., SONG, A., XU, C. and YANG, H. 2013. Dealing with missing data based on data envelopment analysis and halo effect. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(9): 6135-6145. DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2012.11.015 Go to original source...
  22. ZHU, W., YU, Y. and SUN, P. 2018. Data envelopment analysis cross-like efficiency model for non-homogeneous decision-making units: The case of United States companies' low-carbon investment to attain corporate sustainability. European Journal of Operational Research, 269(1): 99-110. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2017.08.007 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.