Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2019, 67(4), 957-961 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201967040957
Measurement of the Mammary Gland Cistern of Dairy Ewes
- 1 Department of Biology, J. Selye University, Hradná 21, 94501 Komárno, Slovakia
- 2 Department of Animal Production, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Trieda Andreja Hlinku 2, 94976 Nitra, Slovakia
- 3 National Agricultural and Food Centre, Research Institute for Animal Production Nitra, Hlohovecká 2, 95141 Lužianky, Slovakia
- 4 University of Prešov, Faculty of Humanities and Natural Sciences, Department of Biology, Ul. 17 novembra 1, 08116 Prešov, Slovakia
- 5 Research Institute of Animal Production, Přátelství 107, 104 00 Prague 22-Uhříněves, Czech Republic
- 6 Laboratory of Veterinary Histopathology in Komárno, Mila Urbana 7, 945 01 Komárno, Slovakia
At the 3rd and 5th month of lactation, using the ALOKA-250 ultrasonograph with a 3.5 MHz probe, the udder cistern size of the breed Improved Valachian (IV) and the crossbreed IV x Lacaune (IV x LC) was surveyed. Using the method from side 72 ewes were measured, in which the probe was placed in the inguinal-abdominal fold. Variance analysis was used to evaluate the obtained data (length, width and udder cistern area), taking into account the effect of the genotype, stage of lactation and lactation order. The average length, width and area of the left udder cistern (LUC) was 80.72 mm; 33.53 mm and 1907 mm2; for the right udder cistern (RUC) 79.44 mm; 33.01 mm and 1851 mm2. The genotype had a statistically significant effect on the LUC as well as the RUC size (P < 0.05 to 0.001). The LUC area of the IV x LC ewes was 32.7% bigger than at IV (2175 mm2 and 1639 mm2, respectively), and the difference of the RUC was up to 51% in favour of the crossbreed (2227 mm2 and 1475 mm2, respectively). This may be due to laterality, the natural asymmetry found in many mammals. The variability in the observed variables of the left and right udder cisterns was greater in crossbreeds than in the purebred IV ewes.
Keywords: ewes, lactation, udder cistern, ultrasonographic technique, from side method, genotype effect
Grants and funding:
This work was supported by the project KEGA, Project No. 018PU-4/2018 Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic.
Received: March 26, 2019; Accepted: May 24, 2019; Published: August 26, 2019 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- ABSHENAS, J., SAJJADIAN, S. M. and TAGHAVI, M. 2014. Ultrasonographic examination of mammary glands in caspian mares during the lactation and dry period. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Surgery, 9(1), Serial No. 20: 37-44.
- BRUCKMAIER, R. M. and BLUM, J. W. 1992. B-mode ultrasonography of mammary glands of cows, goats and sheep during α- and β-adrenergic agonist and oxytocin administration. Journal of Dairy Research, 59: 151-159. DOI: 10.1017/S0022029900030399
Go to original source...
- BRUCKMAIER, R. M., PAUL, G., MAYER, H. and SCHAMS, D. 1997. Machine milking of Ostfriesian and Lacaune dairy sheep: udder anatomy, milk ejection and milking characteristics. Journal of Dairy Research, 64: 163-172. DOI: 10.1017/S0022029997002173
Go to original source...
- CAJA, G., SUCH, X., RUBERTE, J., CARRETERO, A. and NAVARRO, M. 1999. The use of ultrasonography in the study of mammary gland cisterns during lactation in sheep. In: Barillet, F., and Zervas, N. P. (Eds.). Milking and milk production of dairy sheep and goats. EAAP Publication Nr 95. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Press, pp. 91-93.
- CASTILLO, V., SUCH, X., CAJA, G., CASALS, R., ALBANELL, E. and SALAMA, A. A. K. 2008. Effect of milking interval on milk secretion and mammary tight junction permeability in dairy ewes. Journal of Dairy Science, 91: 2610-2619. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2007-0916
Go to original source...
- FRANZ, S., HOFMANN-PARISOT, M. M. and BAUMGARTNER, W. 2004. Evaluation of three-dimensional ultrasonography of the bovine mammary gland. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 65(8): 1159-1163. DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.1159
Go to original source...
- GONZALEZ-BULNES, A., PALLARES, P. and VAZQUEZ, M. I. 2010. Ultrasonographic imaging in small ruminant reproduction. Reproduction in DomesticAnimals, 45(Suppl 2):9-20. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2010.01640.x
Go to original source...
- MILERSKI, M., MARGETÍN, M., ČAPISTRÁK, A., APOLEN, D., ŠPÁNIK, J. and ORAVCOVÁ, M. 2006. Relationships between external and internal udder measurements and the linear scores for udder morphology traits in dairy sheep. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 51: 383-390. DOI: 10.17221/3955-CJAS
Go to original source...
- NUDDA, A., PULINA, G., VALLEBELLA, R., BENCINI, R. and ENNE, G. 2000. Ultrasound technique for measuring mammary cistern size od dairy ewes. Journal of Dairy Research, 67: 101-106. DOI: 10.1017/S0022029999003921
Go to original source...
- PAYAN-CARREIRA, R. and MARTINS-BESSA, A. C. 2008. Ultrasonographic assessment of the feline mammary gland. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery, 10(5), 466-471. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfms.2008.03.006
Go to original source...
- ROVAI, M., CAJA, G. and SUCH, X. 2008. Evaluation of udder cisterns and effects on milk yield of dairy ewes. Journal of Dairy Science, 91: 4622-4629. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2008-1298
Go to original source...
- SAS INSTITUTE INC. 2002 - 2008. SAS/STAT Version 9.2. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.