Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2017, 65(6), 1987-1996 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201765061987
The Role of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the Development of Rural Areas
- Department of Marketing and Trade, Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
Apart from the indisputable importance of SMEs to the national economy, they also provide social and economic benefits for regions they operate in. In this context, the rural areas seem to be interesting because currently there can be seen a reappraisal and emphasizing of their importance. Between 2015 and 2016 there were carried out surveys in two different regions (Hodonín and Holešov) in order to define the role of SMEs in rural areas. The aim of these surveys was to determine how the particular players of the regional development subjectively perceive the role of SMEs in rural areas, particularly how is the role subjectively perceived by SMEs themselves and also by local representatives in the given regions and how SMEs perceive doing business in such regions. The analysis of survey results together with the analysis of secondary data on the important characteristics of these two regions provided the basis for comparison of subjective perception of SMEs; economic and social benefits in these two different regions. According to our findings the role of SMEs in rural areas in the Czech Republic is determined by the creation of competitive environment, the deepening of ties between apprentices and practice, the use of local resources, the increase in rural area attractiveness, the financial benefits for municipalities, the creation of vacancies, the sustaining of positive relationships within the local community and the development of infrastructure.
Keywords: rural development, the role of SMEs, local representatives, benefits and negatives, entrepreneurship in rural areas
Published: December 7, 2017 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- ACS, Z. J., AUDRETSCH, D. B., BRAUNERHJELM, P. and CARLSSON, B. 2012. Growth and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 39(2): 289 - 300. DOI: 10.1007/s11187-010-9307-2
Go to original source...
- BERNARD, J. 2011. Endogenní rozvojové potenciály malých venkovských obcí - obtížné hledání a měření jejich vlivu. Sociologický Časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 47(4): 745 - 775.
Go to original source...
- BINEK, J., SVOBODOVÁ, H., CHABIČOVSKÁ, K., HOLEČEK, J., GALVASOVÁ, I. and MARTÉNEK, J. 2011. Synergie ve venkovském prostoru: Paradoxy rozvoje venkova. Brno: GaREP.
- CHROMÝ, P., JANČÁK, V., MARADA, M., and HAVLÍČEK. 2011. Venkov - žitý prostor: regionální diferenciace percepce venkova představiteli venkovských obcí v Česku. Geografie, 116(1): 23 - 45.
Go to original source...
- ČSÚ. 2008. Obecné poznatky k vymezení venkova. [Online]. Praha: ČSÚ. Available at: https://www.czso.cz/documents/10180/20536004/130808k01./cb-14d9-40e2-a31b-e80c17fa614c?version=1.0 [Accessed: 2017, September 05].
- ČSÚ. 2015a. Správní obvod ORP Holešov: Vybrané ukazatele za správní obvod Holešov. [Online]. Praha: ČSÚ. Available at: https://www.czso.cz//xz/_holesov. [Accessed: 2017, January 06].
- ČSÚ. 2015b. Správní obvod ORP Holešov: vybrané ukazatele za správní obvod Hodonín. [Online]. Praha: ČSÚ. Available at: https://www.czso.cz///_orp_hodonin [Accessed: 2017, January 06].
- ČSÚ. 2017. Veřejná databáze: Organizační statistika. [Online]. Praha: ČSÚ. Available at: https://vdb.czso.cz/vdbvo2/faces/index.jsf?=statistiky"&ka"=""&akt=498 [Accessed: 2017, January 17].
- EUROPEAN COMMISSION (EC). 2003. Commission Recommendation (2003/361/EC) of 6 May 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises. Official Journal of the European Union, 124: 36-41.
- EUROPEAN COMMISSION (EC). 2017. 2016 SBA Fact Sheet - Czech Republic. [Online]. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/"/21188 [Accessed: 30 January 2017].
- FERREIRA, J. J., FERNANDES, C. I. and RATTEN, V. 2017. Entrepreneurship, innovation and competitiveness: what is the connection? International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 18(1): 73 - 95. DOI: 10.1504/IJBG.2017.081030
Go to original source...
- FINK, M., LOIDL, S. and LANG, R. 2014. Community-based entrepreneurship and rural development: creating favourable conditions for small business in Central Europe. New York: Routledge.
- HLAVSA, T. 2010. The possibilities of complex assessment of the development and categorization of rural areas. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 58(6): 151 - 160. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201058060151
Go to original source...
- KLUFOVÁ, R. 2016. Current delimitation and typology of the Czech countryside and its importance for rural development. Eastern European Countryside, 22(1): 229 - 251. DOI: 10.1515/eec-2016-0011
Go to original source...
- LUCAS, R. 1988. On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1): 3-42. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7
Go to original source...
- MARTINČÍK, D. and ŠLEHOFEROVÁ, M. 2014. Competitiveness and Convergence of Czech Regions: Persistence of Discrepancies. E M Ekonomie a Management / E M Economics, 17(2): 14 - 33. DOI: 10.15240/tul/001/2014-2-002
Go to original source...
- MATEJOVSKY, L., MOHAPATRA, S. and STEINER, B. 2014. The dynamic effects of entrepreneurship on regional economic growth: Evidence from Canada. Growth and Change, 45(4): 611 - 639. DOI: 10.1111/grow.12055
Go to original source...
- NGUYEN, T.T.H., LEBAILLY, P. and NGUYEN, V.N. 2015. The Roll of Small Businesses in Traditional Handcraft in Rural Development: A Case-Study Of Hanoi Suburban Rattan Enterprises. In: International Conference on Emerging Challenges. Hanoi, 12 November 2015. Bach Khoa, pp. 64 - 76.
- OECD. 2009a. How Regions Grow: Trends and Analysis. Paris: OECD.
- OECD. 2009b. Regions matter: economic recovery, innovation and sustainable growth. Paris: OECD, c2009.
- OECD. 2012. Promoting growth in all regions. Paris: OECD.
- PERLÍN, R., KUČEROVÁ, S. and KUČERA, Z. 2010. Typologie venkovského prostoru Česka. Geografie, 115(2): 161 - 187.
Go to original source...
- ROMER, P. M. 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5): 71 - 102. DOI: 10.1086/261725
Go to original source...
- SCHUMPETER, J. A. 1934. The theory of economic development. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
- SOLOW, R. M. 1956. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The quarterly journal of economics, 70(1): 65 - 94. DOI: 10.2307/1884513
Go to original source...
- STEINER, A. and ATTERTON, J. 2015. Exploring the contribution of rural enterprises to local resilience. Journal of Rural Studies, 40: 30 - 45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.05.004
Go to original source...
- VAN EUPEN, M., METZGER, M. J., PÉREZ-SOBA, M., VERBURG, P. H., VAN DOORN, A. and BUNCE, R. G. H. 2012. A rural typology for strategic European policies. Land Use Policy, 29(3): 473 - 482. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.007
Go to original source...
- ŽIVĚLOVÁ, I. and JÁNSKÝ, J. 2008. Analysis of life quality development in the administrative districts of South Moravia. Agricultural Economics - Zemědělská ekonomika, 54(9): 431 - 439.
Go to original source...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.