Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2015, 63(1), 137-141 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201563010137

Seeder with Different Seeding Apparatus in Maize Sowing

Jan Turan1, Vladimir Višacki1, Aleksandar Sedlar1, Sanja Pantelić2, Pavol Findura3, Pavel Máchal4, Jan Mareček5
1 University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Agriculture Novi Sad, Trg D. Obradovića 8, 21000 Novi Sad Serbia
2 VodeVojvodine, Bulevar Mihajla Pupina 25, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
3 Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovak Republic
4 Department of Project Management, Faculty of Regional Development and International Studies, Mendelova Univerzita in Brno, Zemělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
5 Department of Agriculture, Food and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

Precision sowing trend is development of technology of sowing maize. The advantage of planting corn with precision seeder includes saving seeds, fewer working hours, achieves more uniform spacing in the row and depth of planting, and for these reasons it follows that the crop will be uniform in height and strength, which is a prerequisite for high yields. It was performed a field testing of three seed in sowing maize at three different speeds of sowing. Tests were carried out to determine and compare the quality of three planters with under pressure. Seeders worked in similar conditions but third seeder noted presence of crust on the soil surface. They were tested at a speed of 6, 8 and 10 km/h. At a speed of 6 km/h all three planters worked with a coefficient of variation less than 25% and with values from 19.25 to 22.72%, which meets the criteria of quality planting. The percentage of pairwise from 1.66 to 2.64%. The percentage of empty spaces were from 4.24 to 4.93%. Proportion of seeds sown at a given space were from 92.5 to 94.09%, which is an indicator that sowing was successfully. No records are examined quality differences in sowing seed.

Keywords: planting, sowing quality, uniformity seeding, standard deviation, yield
Grants and funding:

This paper is the result of the researchs projects TR31073, Improving the production of maize and sorghum under stress, which is funded by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Serbia and OP VK - CZ.1.07/2.3.00/30.0031 Postdoktorské pozice v technických a ekonomických oborech na MENDELU.

Prepublished online: March 14, 2015; Published: April 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Turan, J., Višacki, V., Sedlar, A., Pantelić, S., Findura, P., Máchal, P., & Mareček, J. (2015). Seeder with Different Seeding Apparatus in Maize Sowing. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis63(1), 137-141. doi: 10.11118/actaun201563010137
Download citation

References

  1. BAUER, P. J., FREDERICK, J. R., and BUSSCHER, W. J. 2002. Tillage effect on nutrient stratification in narrow-and wide-row cropping systems. Soil and Tillage, 66: 175-182. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-1987(02)00025-9 Go to original source...
  2. TAO, C., DONGXING, Z., LI, Y., NANA, G. 2012. Design and experiment of collocated-copying and semi-low-height planting-unit for corn precision seeder. Corny News Network, 28(2).
  3. FINDURA, P., TURAN, J., JOBBÁGY, J., ANGELOVIC, M. 2012. Influence of the physical attributes of seeds on the sowing quality within selected sowing mechanism. Cont. Agr. Engng., 38(1):1-8.
  4. GIL, E. and CARNASA, R. 1996. Working quality of spacing drills, effects of sowing speed and type of seed. In: International Conference on Agricultural Engineering, AgEng 96. Madrid, 57-58.
  5. KOSTIĆ, M. et al. 2011. Optičko-elektronska kontrola setve na sejalicama za širokorednu setvu. Savremena poljoprivredna tehnika, 37(1): 11-22.
  6. LIU, W., TOLLENAAR, M., STEWART, G. and DEEN, W. 2004. Response of com grain yield to spatial and temporal variability in emergence. Crop Sci., 44: 847-854. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2004.0847 Go to original source...
  7. MEŠI, M. 2000. Uticaj rotacije i translacije setvene ploče na ujednačenost razmaka zrna u redu. Doktorska disertacija. Novi Sad: Poljoprivredni fakultet Novi Sad, UDK 631.331.1.
  8. MEŠI, M., MALINOVIĆ, M., KOSTIĆ, M., ANĐELKOVIĆ, S. 2010. Proizvodnja šećerne repe u uslovima konzervacijske obrade zemljišta. Savremena poljoprivredna tehnika, 36(2):129-137.
  9. MEŠI, M., MALINOVIĆ, M,, KOSTIĆ, M. 2008. Parametri kvalitetne setve semenskog kukuruza. Traktori i pogonske mašine, 13(2):14-19.
  10. NIELSEN, R. L. 2004. Effect of Plant Spacing Variability on Corn Grain Yield. Lafayette, USA: Purdue University.
  11. NIELSEN, R. L. 2006. Effect of plant spacing variability on maize grain yield. In: 6th Triennial Conference. Indiana USA.
  12. PANNING, J. W., KOCHER, M. F., SMITH, J. A., KACHMAN, S. D. 2000. Laboratory and field testing of seed spacing uniformity for sugar beet planters. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 16(1): 7-13. DOI: 10.13031/2013.4985 Go to original source...
  13. PARISH, R. L. and BRACY, R. P. 2003. An attempt to improve uniformity of a Gaspardo precision seeder. Hortic. Technology, 13: 100-103. Go to original source...
  14. SEARLE, C. L. 2006. Field slope effects on uniformity of corn seed spacing for three precision planter metering systems. Unpublished M. S. thesis. Lincoln, Nebr.: University of Nebraska Libraries.
  15. TURAN, J., FINDURA, P., ZEMANEK, P., BUGARIN, R., SEDLAR, A., 2011. Parametri setve kukuruza različitim setvenim mehanizmima. Savremena poljoprivredna tehnika, 37(3): 277-282.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.