Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2017, 65(5), 1719-1727 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun201765051719
Position of the Bakery Enterprises in the Czech Republic According to Detailed Specification of the Businesses
- 1 Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 21, Prague 6, Czech Republic
- 2 Department of Systems Engineering, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 21, Prague 6, Czech Republic
Bakery industry is one of the key sectors within the production of food products; however, there is a decrease of staff and lack of interest in studying or doing business in this branch, which is consistent with below-average wage. Very low labour productivity associated with labour intensity and a low economic performance of the industry is also characteristic. This article aims to identify whether those unfavourably evolving characteristics are common to the entire industry, or relate only to specific types of businesses and if they differ significantly among these companies. The existence of companies with similar characteristics will be verified based on cluster analysis which will define the key players on the Czech market with bakery and confectionery products. The results show that there were statistically significant differences in most of the evaluated indicators among the companies producing bakery when we classify the companies according to their size, ownership and use of grant funds. According to the cluster analysis, two key players that represent a threat for other groups of companies were identified on the market. In the risk there is mainly a group of micro and small enterprises with family ownership, whose economic position is weak, even if it represents the largest category. Therefore, more attention should be paid to this group of enterprises and focus on their development and access to finance for the development of their business.
Keywords: bakery industry, economic position, cluster analysis, performance, competitiveness, ownership, economy of business
Grants and funding:
This article was created with the support of the Internal Grant Agency of the Faculty of Economics and Management of the Czech University of Life Sciences Prague. Grant title: The competitiveness of the food industry on the Czech market. Registration number: 20161006.
Published: October 31, 2017 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- BERMAN, S. L., WICKS, A. C., KOTHA, S. and JONES, T. M. 1999. Does stakeholders orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5): 488 - 506. DOI: 10.2307/256972
Go to original source...
- BONDAREVA, I. and ZATROCHOVÁ, M. 2014. Financial support for the development of SMEs in the Slovak Republic. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110: 541 - 548. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.898
Go to original source...
- EMVALOMATIS, G., LANSINK,O. A. and STEFANOU, S. 2008. An Examination of the Relationship Between Subsidies on Production and Technical Efficiency in Agriculture: The Case of Cotton Producers in Greece. In: 107th EAAE Seminar Modelling of Agricultural and Rural Development Policies. Seville, Spain, 29th January - 1st February.
- FOOD DRINK EUROPE. 2015. European Food and Drink Industry 2014-2015. Data and Trends. [Online]. Available: http://www.fooddrinkeurope.eu/uploads/publications_documents/Data_and_Trends_2014-20151.pdf [Accessed: 2016, September 10].
- FRIEDMAN, J., HASTIE, T. and TIBSHIRANI, R. 2001. The elements of statistical learning. Berlin: Springer.
Go to original source...
- GORTON, M. and DAVIDOVA, S. 2004. Farm productivity and efficiency in the CEE applicant countries: A synthesis of results. Agricultural Economics-Czech, 30(1): 1 - 16. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2004.tb00172.x
Go to original source...
- HADLEY, D. 2006. Efficiency and Productivity at the Farm Level in England and Wales 1982 to 2002. Report for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. London, UK.
- HARRIS, R. and TRAINOR, M. 2005. Capital Subsidies and Their Impact on Total Factor Productivity: Firm-level Evidence from Northern Ireland. Journal of Regional Science, 45(1): 49 - 74. DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-4146.2005.00364.x
Go to original source...
- KUCUK, U., EYUBOGLU, M., KUCUK, H. O. and DEGIRMENCIOGLU, G. 2016. Importance of using proper post hoc test with ANOVA. International Journal of Cardiology, 209: 346. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.11.061
Go to original source...
- LATRUFFE, L. 2010. Competitiveness, Productivity and Efficiency in the Agricultural and Agri-Food Sectors. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, No. 30.
- LATRUFFE, L., BALCOMBE, K., DAVIDOVA, S. and ZAWALINSKA, K. 2004. Determinants of technical efficiency of crop and livestock farms in Poland. Applied Economics, 36(12): 1255 - 1263. DOI: 10.1080/0003684042000176793
Go to original source...
- MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE and ÚZEI. 2015. Panorama of Food Industry 2014. Praha: Ministerstvo zemědělství. [Online]. Available at: http://eagri.cz/public/web/mze/potraviny/publikace-a-dokumenty/panorama-potravinarskeho-prumyslu/panorama-potravinarskeho-prumyslu-2014.html [Accessed: 2016, Septemeber 10].
- MEJSTŘÍKOVÁ, L., MEZERA, J. and PLÁ©IL, M. 2011. Positive and Negative Aspects of Financial Economic Development in Selected Branches of the Food Industry of the CR in 2007 - 2009 as Revealed by Spider Analysis. Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 3(2): 39 - 54.
- MERIC, G., WELSH, C., WEIDMAN, S. and MARMON, R. 2011. The Effects of the 2008 Stock Market Crash on the Managerial Behavior, Financial Characteristics and Competitiveness of Large U. S. Corporations. Journal of Global Business Issues, 5(1): 11 - 20.
- ROSSI, F. and MIRTCHEV, V. 2016. Statistics for Food Scientists. San Diego: Academic Press.
- SANTIS. P., ALBUQUERQUE, A. and LIZARELLI, F. 2016. Do sustainable companies have a better financial performance? A study on Brazilian public companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133: 735 - 745. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.180
Go to original source...
- SAURO, J. and LEWIS, J. R. 2016. Quantifying the User Experience. Cambridge: Morgan Kaufmann.
Go to original source...
- SKURAS, D., TSEKOURAS, K., DIMARA. E. and TZELEPIS. D. 2006. The Effects of Regional Capital Subsidies on Productivity Growth: A Case Study of the Greek Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry. Journal of Regional Science, 46(2): 355 - 381. DOI: 10.1111/j.0022-4146.2006.00445.x
Go to original source...
- SZEKELY, G. J. and RIZZO, M. L. 2005. Hierarchical clustering via joint between-within distances: Extending Ward's minimum variance method. Journal of classification, 22(2): 151 - 183. DOI: 10.1007/s00357-005-0012-9
Go to original source...
- TONSOR, G. and FEATHERSTONE, A. 2009. Production efficiency of specialized swine producers. Review of Agricultural Economics, 31(3): 493 - 510. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9353.2009.01450.x
Go to original source...
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.