Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2019, 67, 1535-1540

https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201967061535
Published online 2019-12-22

Data Envelopment Analysis Models in Non-Homogeneous Environment

Josef Jablonský

Department of Econometrics, Faculty of Informatics and Statistics, University of Economics, Prague, W. Churchill Sq. 4, 13067 Praha 3, Czech Republic

Received June 3, 2019
Accepted September 9, 2019

References

1. ANDERSEN, P. and PETERSEN, N. C. 1993. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 39(10): 1261–1264. <https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1261>
2. BANKER, R. D., CHARNES, A. and COOPER, W. W. 1984. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9): 1078–1092. <https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078>
3. BARAT, M., TOHIDI, G. and SANEI, M. 2018. DEA for nonhomogeneous mixed networks. Asia Pacific Management Review, 24(2): 161–166. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2018.02.003>
4. CASTELLI, L., PESENTI, R. and UKOVICH, W. 2001. DEA-like models for efficiency evaluations of specialized and interdependent units. European Journal of Operational Research, 132(2): 274–286. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00151-X>
5. CASTELLI, L., PESENTI, R. and UKOVICH, W. 2004. DEA-like models for the efficiency evaluation of hierarchically structured units. European Journal of Operational Research, 154(2): 465–476. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00182-6>
6. CHARNES, A., COOPER, W. W. and RHODES, E. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6): 429–444. <https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8>
7. CHEN, Y., WU, L. and LU, B. 2018. Data envelopment analysis procedure with two non-homogeneous DMU groups. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 29(4): 780–788.
8. COOK, W. D., HARRISON, J., ROUSE, P. and ZHU, J. 2012. Relative Efficiency Measurement: The Problem of a Missing Output in a Subset of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 220(1): 79–84. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.01.022>
9. COOK, W. D., HARRISON, J., IMANIRAD, R., ROUSE, P. and ZHU, J. 2013. Data envelopment analysis with nonhomogeneous DMUs. Operations Research, 61(3): 666–676. <https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2013.1173>
10. DU, J., CHEN, Y. and HUO, J. 2015. DEA for non-homogenous parallel networks. Omega, 56(1): 122–132. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.10.001>
11. DYSON, R. G., ALLEN, R., CAMANHO, A. S. PODINOVSKI, V., SARRICO, C. S. and SHALE, E. A. 2001. Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 132(2): 245–259. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00149-1>
12. HAAS, D. and MURPHY, F. 2003. Compensating for non-homogeneity in decision-making units in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 144(3): 530–544. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00139-X>
13. HUANG, C. W., CHIU, Y. H., TU, C. H., LUO, Z. Y. and WANG, Z. 2016. Using the non-homogeneous frontier two-stage DEA model to assess the efficiencies of expense utilization and operation of the Taiwanese hotel industry. International Transactions in Operational Research, 23(6): 1067–1087. <https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12180>
14. IMANIRAD, R., COOK, W. D. and ZHU, J. 2013. Partial input to output impacts in DEA: Production considerations and resource sharing among business subunits. Naval Research Logistics, 60(3): 190–207. <https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21528>
15. KAO, C. and HWANG, S. N. 2008. Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. European Journal of Operational Research, 185(1): 418–429. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.11.041>
16. LI, W. H., LIANG, L., COOK, W. D. and ZHU, J. 2016. DEA models for non-homogeneous DMUs with different input configurations. European Journal of Operational Research, 254(3): 946–956. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.04.063>
17. LI, Y., LEI, X. and MORTON, A. 2018. Performance evaluation of nonhomogeneous hospitals: The case of Hong Kong hospitals. Health Care Management Science, 22(2): 215–228. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-018-9433-y>
18. SAEN, R. F., MEMARIANI, A. and LOTFI, F. H. 2005. Determining relative efficiency of slightly non-homogeneous decision making units by data envelopment analysis: a case study in IROST. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 165(2): 313–328. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2004.04.050>
19. SINGH, S. and RANJAN, P. 2018. Efficiency analysis of non-homogeneous parallel sub-unit systems for the performance measurement of higher education. Annals of Operations Research, 269(1–2): 641–666. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2586-0>
20. SUN, J., WANG, C., JI, X. and WU, J. 2017. Performance evaluation of heterogeneous bank supply chain systems from the perspective of measurement and decomposition. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 113: 891–903. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.05.028>
21. ZHA, Y., SONG, A., XU, C. and YANG, H. 2013. Dealing with missing data based on data envelopment analysis and halo effect. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37(9): 6135–6145. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.11.015>
22. ZHU, W., YU, Y. and SUN, P. 2018. Data envelopment analysis cross-like efficiency model for non-homogeneous decision-making units: The case of United States companies’ low-carbon investment to attain corporate sustainability. European Journal of Operational Research, 269(1): 99–110. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.08.007>
front cover

ISSN 1211-8516 (Print)

ISSN 2464-8310 (Online)

Current issue

Review Management System NEW Indexed in DOAJ

Archive