Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2018, 66, 183-194

https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201866010183
Published online 2018-02-28

The Quality Assessment of Forests in the Cadastral District of Zvolen (Slovakia)

Martina Slámová, Peter Jančura, Juraj Modranský

Department of Landscape Planning and Design, Faculty of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Technical University in Zvolen, T.G. Masaryka 24, 96053 Zvolen, Slovakia

References

1. AHERN, J. 2013. Urban landscape sustainability and resilience: The promise and challenges of integrating ecology with urban planning and design. Landscape Ecology, 28 (6): 1203–1212. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z>
2. ANANDA, J. and HERATH, G. 2003. Incorporating stakeholder values into regional forest planning: a value function approach. Ecological Economics, 45(1): 75–90. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00004-1>
3. BALESTRIERI, M. and CONGIU, T. 2017. Rediscovering Rural Territories by Means of Religious Route Planning. Sustainability, 9(3), 363. <https://doi.org/10.3390/su9030363>
4. BEVERLY, J. L., UTO, K., WILKES, J. and BOTHWELL, P. 2008. Assessing spatial attributes of forest landscape values: an internet‑based participatory mapping approach. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 38(2): 289–303 <https://doi.org/10.1139/X07-149>
5. BEZÁK, P., MEDERLY, P., IZAKOVIČOVÁ, Z., ŠPULEROVÁ, J. and SCHLEYER, CH. 2017. Divergence and conflicts in landscape planning across spatial scales in Slovakia: An opportunity for an ecosystem services‑based approach? International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 13(2): 119–135. <https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2017.1305992>
6. BUGALHO, M.N., DIAS, F., BRIÑAS, B. and CERDEIRA, J.O. 2016. Using the high conservation value forest concept and Pareto optimization to identify areas maximizing biodiversity and ecosystem services in cork oak landscapes. Agroforestry Systems, 90(1): 35–44. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-015-9814-x>
7. CHOCHOLOVÁ, M., CHOCHOL, V., HOVORKOVÁ, F., BARTEK, M., STREČOK, J., PAULÍNYOVÁ, N., TROPP, Š., HLINKA, P., KOVÁČIK, M., TREBICHAVSKÁ, D., VALACHOVÁ, Z. and HANOVÁ, V. 2004. Urban Plan of Zvolen [in Slovak: Územný plán mesta Zvolen]. Banská Bystrica: Slovak Environmental Agency.
8. CICES V4.3. 2013. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES). [Online]. Available at: cices.eu/content/uploads/sites/8/2015/09/CICES-V4-3-_-17-01-13a.xlsx [Accessed: 2016, March 15].
9. COUNCIL OF EUROPE. 2000. The European Landscape Convention – Firenze, 20. X. 2000. Official Text in English and Explanatory Report. ETS No. 176. [Online]. Available at: http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/heritage/Landscape/default_en.asp [Accessed: 2016, March 21].
10. DANIEL, T. C., MUHAR, A., ARNBERGER, A. and COSTANZA, P. 2012. Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(23): 8812–8819.
11. DIAZ‑BALTEIRO, L., GONZALEZ‑PACHON, J. and ROMERO, C. 2010. Forest management with multiple criteria and multiple stakeholders: An application to two public forests in Spain. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 24(1): 87–93. <https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580802687440>
12. EKKEL, E. D. and VRIES, S. DE. 2017. Nearby green space and human health: Evaluating accessibility metrics. Landscape and Urban Planning, 157: 214–220. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.06.008>
13. FOREST EUROPE. 2003. Vienna Resolution 3. [Online]. Available at: http://www.foresteurope.org/docs/MC/MC_vienna_resolution_v3.pdf [Accessed: 2015, May 25].
14. FRIES, C., CARLSSON, M., DAHLIN, B., LÄMÅS, T. and SALLNÄS, O. 1998. A review of conceptual landscape planning models for multiobjective forestry in Sweden. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 28(2): 159–167. <https://doi.org/10.1139/x97-204>
15. GENELETTI, D. 2007. Expert Panel‑based Assessment of Forest Landscapes for Land Use Planning. Mountain Research and Development, 27(3): 220–223. <https://doi.org/10.1659/0276-4741(2007)27[220:EPAOFL]2.0.CO;2>
16. GEOPORTAL 2015. Map client ZBGIS®. [Online]. Available at: https://zbgisws.skgeodesy.sk/zbgis_wms_featureinfo/service.svc/get and https://zbgisws.skgeodesy.sk/zbgis_dmr3_wms/service.svc/get [Accessed: 2016, April 8].
17. GEOPORTÁL BBSK 2015. Territorial plan of the Banská Bystrica Regional Government [in Slovak: Územný plán vyššieho územného celku Banská Bystrica]. [Online]. Available at: https://geoportal.bbsk.sk/geoportal/full.aspx?GPW=UZEMNY_PLAN [Accessed: 2016, April 1].
18. HEIN, L., KOPPEN, K., GROOT, R. S. and IERLAND, E. C. 2006. Spatial scales, stakeholders and the evaluation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 57(2): 209–228. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.005>
19. HELLMUND, P. C and SMITH, D. S. 2006. Designing Greenways, Sustainable Landscapes for Nature and People. Washington: Island Press.
20. JANČURA, P., MIDRIAK, R., ZAUŠKOVÁ, Ľ., JAKUBIS, M., SLÁMOVÁ, M., AUXT, P., BELÁČEK, B., UJHÁZY, K., KRIŠTÍN, A., KOČÍK, K., ŽIAČIK, M., PAVLÍK, J., MYSLIVCOVÁ, Z., BOHÁLOVÁ, I., CHOCHOLOVÁ, M., ŽIAČIK, M. and BORSKÁ, L. 2003. Landscape Ecological Plan for the Zvolen town [in Slovak: Krajinno‑ekologický plan pre mesto Zvolen]. [Online]. Available at: http://strategia.zvolen.sk/?id_menu=19622 [Accessed: 2016, April 2].
21. KIKER, G. A., BRIDGES, T. S., VARGHESE, A., SEAGER, T. P. and LINKOV, I. 2005. Application of multi‑criteria decision analysis in environmental decision making. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 1(2): 95–108. <https://doi.org/10.1897/IEAM_2004a-015.1>
22. KOZOVÁ, M. and FINKA M. 2010. Landscape development planning and management systems in selected European countries. The Problems of Landscape Ecology, 28: 101–110.
23. KRISTIÁNOVÁ, K. and ŠTĚPÁNKOVÁ, R. 2012. Historical and cultural values of forest landscape in Iliašovce, Spiš Region – Protection and Presentation for Tourism. In: Public recreation and landscape protection – hand in hand. Conference proceedings. Křtiny: UMB, pp. 93–97.
24. MAGLOCKÝ, Š. 2002. Potential Natural Vegetation [in Slovak: Prirodzená potenciálna vegetácia]. In: MIKLÓS, L. and HRNČIAROVÁ, T. (Eds.). Landscape Atlas of the Slovak Republic. Bratislava: MŽP SR and Banská Bystrica: SAŽP, pp. 114–115.
25. MALINIAK, P. 2009. Man and the landscape of the Zvolenská kotlina Basin [in Slovak: Človek a krajina Zvolenskej kotliny v stredoveku]. Banská Bystrica: UMB.
26. MAP PORTAL HIKING.SK 2016. Hiking map of Slovakia. [Online]. Available at: http://mapy.hiking.sk/ [Accessed: 2016, April 8, 2016].
27. MÍCHAL, I. 1985. Ecological Master Plan of the ČSR [in Czech: Ekologický generel ČSR]. Brno: Terplan Praha and GgÚ ČSAV.
28. MILLER, R. W., HAUER, R. J. and WERNER, L. P. 2015. Urban forestry: planning and managing urban greenspaces. 3rd edition. Waveland Press Inc.
29. NATIONAL FOREST CENTRE. 2015. Forest GIS. [Online]. Available at: Available at http://gis.nlcsk.org/arcgis/services/Inspire/JPRL/MapServer/WmsServer? [Accessed: 2016, March 6].
30. PAVLÍK, J., JANČURA, P. and GREGOR, M. 1999. Mental Maps of Zvolen [in Slovak: Mentálne mapy mesta Zvolen]. Geografické štúdie, 6: 245–252.
31. PAŽINOVÁ, N., BELJAK, J., SLÁMOVÁ, M. and BELÁČEK, B. 2013. The Medieval Road Network in Surroundings of the Deserted Castle. Analysis Based on Anthropogenic Relief Form. [in Slovak: Stredoveká cestná sieť v okolí zvolenského Pustého hradu. Analýza na základe antropogénnych reliéfnych foriem]. Študijné zvesti archeologického ústavu SAV, 54: 153–170.
32. PICHLEROVÁ, M., PATÚŠ, P., PICHLER, V. and BIHÚŇOVÁ, M. 2008. Temperate primeval forests and their potential and use for recreation. In: Forest recreation & tourism serving urbanised societies: a joint final conference of forest for recreation and tourism (COST E33) and 11th European forum on urban forestry (EFUF). Hämeenlinna, May 28–31, 2008.
33. PLIENINGER, T., DIJKS, S., OTEROS‑ROZAS, E. and BIELING C. 2013. Assessing, mapping and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy, 33: 118–129. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.12.013>
34. SLÁMOVÁ, M., CHUDÝ, F., BELJAK PAŽINOVÁ, N. and BELJAK, J. 2016. Multidisciplinary Approach to Research on Historical Landscape Structures. In: Landscape and Landscape Ecology. Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Landscape Ecology, Nitra, 27–29 May 2015. Bratislava: Institute of Landscape Ecology, pp. 176–184.
35. STEPHENSON, J. 2008. The Cultural Values Model: An integrated approach to values in landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 84(2): 127–139. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.07.003>
36. TENGBERG, A., FREDHOLM, S., ELIASSON, I., KNEZ, I., SALTZMAN, K. and WETTERBERG, O. 2012. Cultural ecosystem services provided by landscapes: Assessment of heritage values and identity. Ecosystem Services, 2: 14–26. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.006>
37. TIMOTHY, D. J. and BOYD, S. W. 2015. Tourism and trails : cultural, ecological and management issues. Channel View Publications.
38. TUKIAINEN, H., ALAHUHTA, J., ALA‑HULKKO, T., FIELD, R., LAMPINEN, R. and HJORT, J. 2016. Spatial relationship between biodiversity and geodiversity across a gradient of land‑use intensity in high‑latitude landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 32(5): 1049–1063. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-017-0508-9>
39. ÚRAD GEODÉZIE, KARTOGRAFIE A KATASTRA SLOVENSKEJ REPUBLIKY. 2015. Electronic Services of Real Eastate Cadastre Portal [in Slovak: Portál elektronických služieb katastra nehnuteľností]. [Online]. Available at: https://kataster.skgeodesy.sk/eskn/services/NR/kn_wms_orto/MapServer/WmsServer? [Accessed: 2016, April 3].
40. VERBIJ, E. E. M, TURNHOUT, E. and SCHANZ, H. 2014. Comparative Analysis of Framing the ‘Forest Sector’: Case Studies from Australia and The Netherlands. In: Cross‑sectoral Policy Developments in Forestry – A World Wide, Regional and National Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 174–182.
41. VINNING, J. and TYLER, E. 1999. Values, Emotions and Desired Outcomes Reflected in Public Responses to Forest Management Plans. Human Ecology Review, 6(1): 21–34.
front cover

ISSN 1211-8516 (Print)

ISSN 2464-8310 (Online)

Current issue

Review Management System NEW

Archive