Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2016, 64, 213-222

https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201664010213
Published online 2016-02-29

The Impact of the Public Support for R & D on the Economic Performance of SMEs

Ivana Blažková

Department of Regional and Business Economics, Faculty of Regional Development and International Studies, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

References

1. ALMUS, M., CZARNITZKI, D. 2003. The Effects of Public R & D Subsidies on Firms’ Innovation Activities: The Case of Eastern Germany. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics: 21(2): 226–236. <https://doi.org/10.1198/073500103288618918>
2. AMSP ČR. 2012. Závěrečná zpráva z výzkumu: Postoj podnikatelů v rámci SME k inovacím a jejich financování. [Online]. Available at: http://www.amsp.cz/uploads/Pruzkumy/Vysledky_16._pruzkumu_AMSP_CR.pdf. [Accessed: 2014, April 30].
3. BISNODE ČESKÁ REPUBLIKA, a. s. 2014. Databáze Albertina – Gold Edition. Praha: Bisnode.
4. BLAŽKOVÁ, I. 2010. Economic performance differentiation of the processing stage within the commodity chain. Agriculture Economics, 56(1): 16–24.
5. BLAŽKOVÁ, I., MARŠÁLKOVÁ, H. M. 2014. Support of regional development and competitiveness through the innovations and research in SMEs. In: Region v rozvoji společnosti 2014: proceedings of the 6th International Scientific Conference. Mendel University in Brno, 23 October. Brno: Faculty of Regional Development and International Studies, Mendel University in Brno.
6. BOHATÁ, M. 1999. Technological innovations and R & D strategies in the Czech Republic. Prague Economic Papers, 1999(4).
7. BUSOM, I. 2000. An empirical evaluation of the effects of R & D subsidies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 9: 111–148. <https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590000000006>
8. CERULLI, G. 2010. Modelling and Measuring the Effect of Public Subsidies on Business R & D: A Critical Review of the Econometric Literature. Economic Record, 86: 421–449. <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2009.00615.x>
9. COOKE, P., PICCALUGA, A. 2006. Regional development in the knowledge economy. London and New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
10. ČESKÝ STATISTICKÝ ÚŘAD. 2013. Ukazatele výzkumu a vývoje za rok 2012. [Online]. Praha: ČSÚ. Kód publikace: 9601-13. Available at: http://www.czso.cz/csu/2013edicniplan.nsf/p/9601-13. [Accessed: 2014, April 25].
11. ČESKÝ STATISTICKÝ ÚŘAD. 2014. Výzkum a vývoj: Ukazatele výzkumu a vývoje za Českou republiku celkem, tab. 31. [Online]. Available at: http://www.czso.cz/csu/redakce.nsf/i/statistika_vyzkumu_a_vyvoje. [Accessed: 2014, October 18].
12. DAVID, P. A., BRONWYN, H. M. and TOOLE, A. A. 2000. Is public R & D a complement or substitute for private R & D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy, 29: 497–529. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00087-6>
13. DOČEKALOVÁ, M., BOČKOVÁ, N. 2013. The Use Of Data Envelopment Analysis To Assess The R & D Effectiveness Of The Czech Manufacturing Industry. Verslas: teorija ir praktika, (4): 308–314.
14. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2003. Commission Recommendation 2003/361/EC. Official Journal of the European Union. [Online]. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2003:124:0036:0041:EN:PDF. [Accessed: 2014, May 04].
15. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2004. Commission Regulation (EC) No 364/2004. Official Journal of the European Union. [Online]. Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2003:124:0036:0041:EN:PDF. [Accessed: 2014, May 04].
16. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2005. The New SME Definition – User guide and model declaration. [Online]. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme/index_en.htm. [Accessed: 2014, May 04].
17. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2010. Europe 2020 – A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. [Online]. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/index_en.htm. [Accessed: 2014, May 06].
18. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2014. Research & Innovation. [Online]. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/index.cfm. [Accessed: 2014, August 22].
19. EUROPEAN UNION PARLIAMENT. 2000. Lisbon European Council 23 and 24 March, Presidency Conclusion. [Online]. Available at: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/00100-r1.en0.htm. [Accessed: 2014, May 06].
20. GOGLIO, A. 2006. “Policies to Promote Innovation in the Czech Republic”. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 498. Paris: OECD Publishing.
21. GUELLEC, D., VAN POTTELSBERGHE DE LA POTTERIE, B. 2003. The impact of public R & D expenditure on business R & D. Economics of innovation and new technology, 12(3): 225–243. <https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590290004555>
22. HARRIS, R., LI, Q. C. and TRAINOR, M. 2009. Is a higher rate of R & D tax credit a panacea for low levels of R & D in disadvantaged regions? Research Policy, 38(1): 192–205. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.10.016>
23. JÁČ, I., RYVALDOVÁ, P. and ŽIŽKA, M. 2005. Inovace v malém a středním podnikání. Brno: Computer Press.
24. KISLINGEROVÁ, E. 2007. Manažerské finance. Praha: C. H. Beck.
25. KLETTE, T. J., MŘEN, J. and GRILICHES, Z. 2000. Do subsidies to commercial R & D reduce market failures? Microeconometric evaluation studies. Research Policy, 29(4): 471–495. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00086-4>
26. LOKSHIN, B., MOHNEN, P. 2012. How effective are level-based R & D tax credits? Evidence from the Netherlands. Applied Economics, 44(12): 1527–1538. <https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2010.543083>
27. MEJSTŘÍKOVÁ, L., MEZERA, J. and PLÁŠIL, M. 2011. Positive and Negative Aspects of Financial Economic Development in Selected Branches of the Food Industry of the CR in 2007–2009 as Revealed by Spider Analysis. Agris on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, III(2): 39–54.
28. MINISTERSTVO PRŮMYSLU A OBCHODU ČR. 2013. Zpráva o vývoji malého a středního podnikání a jeho podpoře v roce 2012. [Online]. Available at: http://www.mpo.cz/dokument142895.html. [Accessed: 2014, May 07].
29. MINISTERSTVO ZAHRANIČNÍCH VĚCÍ ČR. 2013. Věda a výzkum v ČR. [Online]. Available at: http://www.mzv.cz/jnp/cz/zahranicni_vztahy/veda_a_technologie/veda_a_vyzkum_v_cr.html. [Accessed: 2014, October 15].
30. NELSON, R. 2005. Technology, institutions and economic growth. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
31. OECD. 2013. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013. OECD Publishing. [Online]. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/sti_scoreboard-2013-en. [Accessed: 2014, November 30].
32. PIEKUT, M. 2013. Comparison of R & D Expenditures in Selected Countries. Comparative Economic Research, 16(3): 107–126. <https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2013-0021>
33. PUTIĆOVÁ, M., MEZERA, J. 2009. Research, development and innovation in the Czech food industry–perspectives. Agricultural Economics–Czech, 55: 534–540.
34. RADA PRO VÝZKUM, VÝVOJ A INOVACE. 2014. Informační systém výzkumu, experimentálního vývoje a inovací. InfoScience Praha s. r. o. [Online]. Available at: http://www.isvav.cz/prepareOrganizationForm.do. [Accessed: 2014, October 30].
35. ROMERO-JORDÁN, D., DELGADO-RODRÍGUEZ, M. J., ÁLVAREZ-AYUSO, I. and DE LUCAS-SANTOS, S. 2014. Assessment of the public tools used to promote R & D investment in Spanish SMEs. Small Business Economics, 43(4): 959–976. <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9575-3>
36. TAKALO, T., TANAYAMA, T. and TOIVANEN, O. 2013. Market failures and the additionality effects of public support to private R & D: Theory and empirical implications. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 31(5): 634–642. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2013.02.002>
37. ÚŘAD VLÁDY ČR, RADA PRO VÝZKUM, VÝVOJ A INOVACE. 2014. Analýza stavu výzkumu, vývoje a inovací v České republice a jejich srovnání se zahraničím v roce 2013. [Online]. Praha: Úřad vlády České republiky. Available at: http://www.vyzkum.cz/FrontClanek.aspx?idsekce=711241. [Accessed: 2014, August 22].
front cover

ISSN 1211-8516 (Print)

ISSN 2464-8310 (Online)

Current issue

Review Management System NEW Indexed in DOAJ

Archive