Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2015, 63, 675-681

https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201563020675
Published online 2015-05-10

Consequences of the Public Contract Law for Purchase of Scientific Appliances in the Czech Republic

Martin Vyklický

Institute of Law and Social Sciences, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

References

1. ALLAIN, Y. 2006. New European Directives on Public Procurement: Change or Continuity. Public Contract Law Journal, 35(3): 517–536.
2. BOVIS, C. 2006. The New Public Procurement Legal Framework. European Public Law, 12, (1, 33): 73–109.
3. CZECH REPUBLIC. 2006. Act No. 137/2006 Coll., on Public contracts, as amended (Public Contract Law). In: ASPI [Law Information System]. Wolters Kluwer ČR, a. s. [Accessed: 1. 3. 2014].
4. CZECH STATISTIC OFFICE, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. 2011. Statistic report. [Online]. Accessible at: http://www.czso.cz/csu/redakce.nsf/i/statistika_vyzkumu_a_vyvoje. [Accesed: 1. 8. 2013].
5. EUR-LEX. 2002. Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 18 June 2002 C-92/00, Hospital Ingenieure Krankenhaustechnik Plan ungs-Gesellschaft mbH (HI) against Stadt Wien). In: European Court Reports 2002. [online]. Accessible at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62000CJ0092. [Accessed: 1. 8. 2013].
6. EUROPEAN COMMISSION. 2011. Internal Procurement market. [Online]. Accessible at: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/publicprocurement/docs/modernising_rules/public-procurement-indicators-2011_en.pdf. [Accessed: 1. 8. 2013].
7. JURČÍK, R. 2013a. Case C-454/06, Pressetext Nachrichtenagentur v Austria – legal and economic aspects. Solutions for public administration? Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 61(6): 967–971. <https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201361040967>
8. JURČÍK, R. 2013b. Collaborative defence procurement in the European Union and in the Czech Republic –business principle leading more effectiveness of public expenditure in the field of defence. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 61(7): 2249–2253. Accessible at: http://acta.mendelu.cz/61/7/2249/. [Accessed: 1. 3. 2014]. <https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201361072249>
9. JURČÍK, R. 2014a. Permissible public cooperation in the field of public administration – opportunity for enterprises. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 62(6): 1309–1314. Accessible at: http://acta.mendelu.cz/62/6/1309/. [Accessed: 1. 3. 2014]. <https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201462061309>
10. JURČÍK, R. 2014b. Public Procurement in the Field of Public Administration in the Czech Republic, Selected Aspects. WSEAS Transactions on Business and Economics, 11(57): 615–624. WSEAS. [Online]. Accessible at: http://www.wseas.org/multimedia/journals/economics/2014/a105707-279.pdf. [Accessed: 1. 3. 2014].
11. KASTANIOTI, C., KONTODIMOPOULOS, N. et al. 2012. Public procurement of health technologies in Greece in an era of economic crisis. Health Policy, 109(1): 7–13. Web of knowledge. [online]. Accessible at: http://www.sciencedirect.com.ezproxy.lib.vutbr.cz/science/article/pii/S0168851012000802. [Accessed: 1. 3. 2014]. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.03.015>
12. KRUTÁK, T., KRUTÁKOVÁ, L. 2013. Zákon o veřejných zakázkách s komentářem s příklady. Praha: ANAG.
13. MINISTERSTVO PRO MÍSTNÍ ROZVOJ ČR. 2012a. Annual Report on Public Tenders in the Czech Republic. [Online]. Available from: http://www.portal-vz.cz/cs/Spoluprace-a-vymena-informaci/Vyrocni-zpravy-a-souhrnne-udaje-o-verejnych-zakazkach. [Accessed: 1. 8. 2013].
14. MINISTERSTVO PRO MÍSTNÍ ROZVOJ. 2012b. Structural funds. Monthly monitoring report on drawing of structural funds. [Online]. Accessible at: http://www.strukturalni-fondy.cz/getmedia/238c186d-e013-4544-93e5-6e1db29545bc/MMZ_2013_06.pdf. [Accessed: 1. 8. 2013].
15. NSS. ©2010. Judgement of the Supreme Administrative Court of 27 January 2010, NSS 2 Afs 64/2009. In: Supreme Administrative Court of the CR. [online]. Accessible at: http://www.nssoud.cz/files/soudni_vykon/2009/0064_2Afs_0900_bca900bb_b0e6_41cf_9455_c58fda146fcb_prevedeno.pdf. [Accessed: 1. 8. 2013].
16. SORENSON, C., KANAVOS, P. 2011. Medical technology procurement in Europe: a cross-country comparison of current practice and policy. Health Policy, 100(1): 43–50. Web of knowledge. [online]. Accessible at: http://www.sciencedirect.com.ezproxy.lib.vutbr.cz/science/article/pii/S0168851010002253. [Accessed: 1. 3. 2014]. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.08.001>
17. ÚOHS. © 2013. Decision of The office of the protection of competition of 24 October 2012, UOHS-S235/2012/VZ-20045/2012/560/MSc In: Office for the Protection of Competition. [online]. Accessible at: https://www.uohs.cz/cs/verejne-zakazky/sbirky-rozhodnuti/detail-9985.html. [1. 8. 2013].
front cover

ISSN 1211-8516 (Print)

ISSN 2464-8310 (Online)

Current issue

Review Management System NEW Indexed in DOAJ

Archive