Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2015, 63, 131-136

https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201563010131
Published online 2015-03-14

Comparison of Rheological Properties of Hopped Wort and Malt Wort

Petr Trávníček, Josef Los, Petr Junga

Department of Agriculture, Food and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic

References

1. AHMED, J., RAMASWAMY, H. S., SASHIDHAR, K. C. 2007. Rheological characteristics of tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) juice concentrates. LWT, 40: 225–231. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2005.11.002>
2. BHATTACHARYA, S., VASUDHA, N., KRISHNA MURTHY, K. S. 1999. Rheology of mustard paste: a controlled stress measurement. Journal of Food Engineering, 41(1999): 187–191. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(99)00102-8>
3. BOŽIKOVÁ, M., HLAVÁČ, P. 2011. Comparison of thermophysical and rherological properties of different light beers. Journal on processing and energy in agriculture, 15: 6–11.
4. HLAVÁČ, P., BOŽIKOVÁ, M. 2012. Comparison of Topvar(r) beer rheological and thermophysical properties = Porovnanie reologických a termofyzikálnych vlastností piva Topvar(r). Acta technologica agriculturae, 15: 23–27.
5. HLAVAČ, P. 2010. Changes in malt wort dynamic viscosity during fermentation. Journal on Processing and Energy in Agriculture, 14: 15–18.
6. HLAVÁČ, P. 2007. Dependencies of dark beer rheologic properties on various parameters during storage. In: Advances in labour and machinery management for a profitable agriculture and forestry. Nitra: Slovak University of Agriculture, 323–335.
7. JONKOVA, G., SURLEVA, A. 2013. Impact of polysaccharides of malt on filterability of beer and possibilities for their reduction by enzymatic additives. Journal of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy, 48: 234–240.
8. KUMBÁR, V., POLCAR, A., ČUPERA, J. 2013. Rheological profiles of blends of the new and used motor oils. Rheological profiles of blends of the new and used motor oils. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 41: 115–122. <https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201361010115>
9. KUMBÁR, V., DOSTÁL, P. 2014. Temperature dependence density and kinematic viscosity of petrol, bioethanol and their blends. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 51: 175–179.
10. MA, L., BARBOSA-CÁNOVAS, G. V. 1995. Rheological characterization of mayonnaise. Part II: Flow and viscoelastic properties at different oil and xanthan gum concentrations. Journal of Food Engineering, 25: 409–425. <https://doi.org/10.1016/0260-8774(94)00010-7>
11. PAZDRO, A., ŠTERN, P. 1997. Praktické využití viskozimetrie v provozní pivovarské laboratoři. Kvasný průmysl, 43: 194–196. <https://doi.org/10.18832/kp1997013>
12. RATKOVICH, N., HORNC, W., HELMUS, F. P., ROSENBERGER, S., NAESSENS, W., NOPENS, I., BENTZEN, T. R. 2013. Activated sludge rheology: A critical review on data collection and modelling. Water Research, 47: 463–482. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.11.021>
13. SEVERA, L., LOS, J., NEDOMOVÁ, Š., BUCHAR, J. 2009. Vliv teploty na dynamickou viskozitu černého piva. [CD-ROM]. In: Jakost a efektivnost produkce regionálních a malých pivovarů: 47–53.
14. SEVERA, L., LOS, J., NEDOMOVÁ, Š., BUCHAR, J. 2009. On the rheological profile of malt wort during processing of substrate for lager beer. Journal of food physics, 22: 5–16.
15. SEVERA, L., LOS, J., NEDOMOVÁ, Š., HAVLÍČEK, M. 2009. Reologický profil mladiny při zpracování základu pro světlé pivo. [CD-ROM]. In: Jakost a efektivnost produkce regionálních a malých pivovarů: 40–46.
front cover

ISSN 1211-8516 (Print)

ISSN 2464-8310 (Online)

Current issue

Review Management System NEW Indexed in DOAJ

Archive