Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2014, 62, 837-847
Published online 2014-12-02

The Response of Basal Area Increment in Old Sprout-origin Sessile Oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) Trees During Their Conversion to a Coppice-with-standards

Zdeněk Adamec, Jan Kadavý, Michal Kneifl, Markéta Šplíchalová, Martin Klimánek

Department of Forest Management and Applied Geoinformatics, Mendel University in Brno, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic


1. ASH, J. E. and BARKHAM, J. P. 1976. Changes and variability in the field layer of a coppiced woodland in Norfolk, England. J. Ecol., 64: 697–712. <>
2. BUCKLEY, G. P. 1992. Ecology and Management of Coppice Woodlands. London: Chapman-Hall.
3. BUFKA, A. 2011. Ceny pevných paliv pro domácnosti. Výsledky šetření k červnu 2011. Praha: Ministerstvo průmyslu a obchodu České republiky.
4. CAMPRODON, J. and BROTONS, L. 2006. Effects of undergrowth clearing on the bird communities of the Northwestern Mediterranean Coppice Holm oak forests. For. Ecol. Manage., 221(1–3): 72–82. <>
5. CAÑELLAS, I., RÍO, M. DEL, ROIG, S. and MONTERO, G. 2004. Growth response to thinning in Quercus pyrenaica Willd. coppice stands in Spanish central mountain. Ann. For. Sci., 61(3): 243–250. <>
6. CANNELL, M. G. R. 1989. Physiological basis of wood production: A review. Scand. J. For. Res., 4(1–4): 459–490. <>
7. CANNELL, M. G. R. and DEWAR, R. C. 1994. Carbon allocation in trees: A review of concepts for modelling. Adv. Ecol. Res., 25: 59–104. <>
8. COLE, W. G., BALSILLIE, D., BEBBER, D. P. and THOMAS, S. C. 2004. Diameter increment in mature eastern white pine Pinus strobus L. following partial harvest of old-growth stands in Ontario, Canada. Trees – Struct. Funct., 18(1): 29–34. <>
9. COLIN, F., ROBERT, N., DRUELLE, J.-L. and FONTAINE, F. 2008. Initial spacing has little influence on transient epicormic shoots in a 20-year-old sessile oak plantation. Ann. For. Sci., 65(5): 508–508. <>
10. COTTA, H. 1845. Anweisungen zum Waldbau. Dresden und Leipzig.
11. DESOTO, L., OLANO, J. M., ROZAS, V. and DE LA CRUZ, M. 2010. Release of Juniperus thurifera woodlands from herbivore-mediated arrested succession in Spain. Appl. Veg. Sci., 13(1): 15–25. <>
12. DIGREGORIO, L. M., KRASNY, M. E. and FAHEY, T. J. 1999. Radial growth trends of sugar maple (Acer saccharum) in an Allegheny northern hardwood forest affected by beech bark disease. J. Torrey Bot. Soc., 126(3): 245–254. <>
13. DOBSON, A. J. 2002. An Introduction to Generalized Linear Models. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
14. FARRAR, J. L. 1961. Longitudinal variation in the thickness of the annual ring. For. Chron., 37: 323–349. <>
15. FAYLE, D. C. F. 1973. Patterns of Annual Xylem Increment Integrated by Contour Presentation. Can. J. For. Res., 3: 105–111. <>
16. GEA-IZQUIERDO, G., CAÑELLAS, I. and MONTERO, G. 2008. Site index in agroforestry systems: age-dependent and age-independent dynamic diameter growth models for Quercus ilex in Iberian open oak woodlands. Can. J. For. Res., 38(1): 101–113. <>
17. GÉNARD, M., DAUZAT, J., FRANCK, N., LESCOURRET, F., MOITRIER, N., VAAST, P. and VERCAMBRE, G. 2008. Carbon allocation in fruit trees: from theory to modelling. Trees – Struct. Funct., 22(3): 269–282. <>
18. GENET, H., BRÉDA, N. and DUFRÊNE, E. 2010. Age-related variation in carbon allocation at tree and stand scales in beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and sessile oak (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) using a chronosequence approach. Tree Physiol., 30(2): 177–92. <>
19. HARMER, R. and HOWE, J. 2003. The silviculture and management of coppice woodlands. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission Publications.
20. HOCHBICHLER, E. 1993. Methods of oak silviculture in Austria. Ann. For. Sci., 50(6): 583–591. <>
21. CHYTRÝ, M., KUČERA, T. and KOČÍ, M. (eds.) 2001. Katalog biotopů České republiky. Praha: Agentura ochrany přírody a krajiny.
22. JOHNSON, P. S., SHIFLEY, S. R. and ROGERS, R. 2009. The Ecology and Silviculture of Oaks. Wallingford: CAB International.
23. JONES, T. A. and THOMAS, S. C. 2004. The time course of diameter increment responses to selection harvests in Acer saccharum. Can. J. For. Res., 34(7): 1525–1533. <>
24. KADAVÝ, J., KNEIFL, M. and KNOTT, R. 2011a. Establishment and selected characteristics of the Hády coppice and coppice-with-standards research plot (TARMAG I). J. For. Sci., 57(10): 451–458. <>
25. KADAVÝ, J., KNEIFL, M. and KNOTT, R. 2011b. Biodiversity and Target Management of Endangered and Protected Species in Coppices and Coppices-With-Standards Included in System of NATURA 2000. (Methodology of Establishment of Experimental Research Plots in the Conversion to Coppice and Coppice-with-Standards and their decription). Brno: Mendel University in Brno.
26. KERR, G. and HARMER, R. 2001. Production of epicormic shoots on oak (Quercus robur): effects of frequency and time of pruning. Forestry, 74(5): 467–477. <>
27. KODANI, J., YAMAMOTO, F., TANIGUCHI, S. and HASHIZUME, H. 2010. Effect of thinning on the growth of stems and development of epicormic shoots in a secondary forest of Quercus crispula and Fagus crenata. J. Japanese For. Soc., 92(4): 200–207. <>
28. KOENIG, W. D. and KNOPS, J. M. H. 1998. Scale of mast-seeding and tree-ring growth. Nature, 396(6708): 225–226. <>
29. KONŠEL, J. 1931. Stručný nástin tvorby a pěstění lesů v bilogickém ponětí. Písek: Česká matice lesnická.
30. KONVIČKA, M., ČÍŽEK, L. and BENEŠ, J. 2006. Ohrožený hmyz nížinných lesů: ochrana a management. Olomouc: Sagittaria.
31. KUSS, O. 2002. Global goodness-of-fit tests in logistic regression with sparse data. Stat. Med., 21(24): 3789–3801. <>
32. LACOINTE, A. 2000. Carbon allocation among tree organs: A review of basic processes and representation in functional-structural tree models. Ann. For. Sci., 57(5–6): 521–533. <>
33. LARSON, P. R. 1963. Stem form development of forest trees. For. Sci., 5: 1–31.
34. LATHAM, P. and TAPPEINER, J. 2002. Response of old-growth conifers to reduction in stand density in western Oregon forests. Tree Physiol., 22(2–3): 137–146. <>
35. LEDERMANN, T. 2010. Evaluating the performance of semi-distance-independent competition indices in predicting the basal area growth of individual trees. Can. J. For. Res., 40(4): 796–805. <>
36. MACHAR, I. 2008. Historical development of floodplain forest in the Upper Moravian Vale (Vrapač National Nature Reserve, Czech Republic). J. For. Sci., 54(9): 426–437. <>
37. MARTÍNEZ-VILALTA, J., VANDERKLEIN, D. and MENCUCCINI, M. 2007. Tree height and age-related decline in growth in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Oecologia, 150(4): 529–44. <>
38. MCCULLAGH, P. and NELDER, J. 1989. Generalized Linear Models. 2nd Edition. London: Chapman and Hall.
39. MCDOWELL, N., BROOKS, J. R., FITZGERALD, S. A. and BOND, B. J. 2003. Carbon isotope discrimination and growth response of old Pinus ponderosa trees to stand density reductions. Plant, Cell Environ., 26(4): 631–644. <>
40. MITCHELL, K. J. and KELLOGG, R. M. 1972. Distribution of Area Increment Over the Bole of Fertilized Douglas-Fir. Can. J. For. Res., 2: 95–97. <>
41. MIYA, H., YOSHIDA, T., NOGUCHI, M. and NAKAMURA, F. 2009. Individual growing conditions that affect diameter increment of tree saplings after selection harvesting in a mixed forest in northern Japan. J. For. Res., 14(5): 302–310. <>
42. MONSERUD, R. A. and STERBA, H. 1996. A basal area increment model for individual trees growing in even- and uneven-aged forest stands in Austria. For. Ecol. Manage., 80(1–3): 57–80. <>
43. MONTES, F., CAÑELLAS, I., DEL RÍO, M., CALAMA, R. and MONTERO, G. 2004. The effects of thinning on the structural diversity of coppice forests. Ann. For. Sci., 61(8): 771–779. <>
44. MYERS, C.A. 1963. Vertical distribution of annual increment in thinned ponderosa pine. For. Sci., 9: 394–404.
45. MZE. 2000. Zpráva o stavu lesa a lesního hospodářství České republiky v roce 2000. Praha: Ministerstvo zemědělství České republiky.
46. MZE. 2009. Zpráva o stavu lesa a lesního hospodářství České republiky v roce 2009. Praha: Ministerstvo zemědělství České republiky.
47. NETER, J., WASSERMAN, W. and KUNTER, M. H. 1990. Applied linear statistical models. 3rd Edition. Chicago: Irwin.
48. NEWTON, M. and COLE, E. C. 1987. A sustained-yield scheme for old growth Douglas-fir. West. J. Appl. For., 2(1): 22–25.
49. O’HARA, K. L., YORK, R. A. and HEALD, R. C. 2008. Effect of pruning severity and timing of treatment on epicormic sprout development in giant sequoia. Forestry, 81(1): 103–110. <>
50. PELTOLA, H., MIINA, J., ROUVINEN, I. and KELLOMÄKI, S. 2002. Effect of Early Thinning on the Diameter Growth Distribution along the Stem of Scots Pine. Silva Fenn., 36(4): 813–825. <>
51. POLANSKÝ, B., ZACHAR, D., BEZAČINSKÝ et al. 1956. Pěstění lesů. III. díl. Praha: Státní zemědělské nakladatelství (SZN).
52. PRETZSCH, H. and BIBER, P. 2010. Size-symmetric versus size-asymmetric competition and growth partitioning among trees in forest stands along an ecological gradient in central Europe. Can. J. For. Res., 40(2): 370–384. <>
53. R DEVELOPMENT CORE TEAM. 2008. A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
54. ROUVINEN, S. and KUULUVAINEN, T. 1997. Structure and asymmetry of tree crowns in relation to local competition in a natural mature Scots pine forest. Can. J. For. Res., 27(6): 890–902. <>
55. SANIGA, M. 2007. Pestovanie lesa. Zvolen: Technická univerzita.
56. SNOWDON, P., WARING, H.D. and WOOLLONS, R.C. 1981. Effect of fertilizer and weed control on stem form and average taper in plantation-grown pines. Aust. For. Res., 11(3–4): 209–221.
57. SPIECKER, H. 1991. Controlling diameter growth and natural pruning of valuable Sessile and Pedunculate oaks (Quercus petraea [Matt.] Liebl. and Quercus robur L.). Freiburg: Institute for Forest Growth, UNI.
58. SPITZER, L., KONVICKA, M., BENES, J., TROPEK, R., TUF, I. H. and TUFOVA, J. 2008. Does closure of traditionally managed open woodlands threaten epigeic invertebrates? Effects of coppicing and high deer densities. Biol. Conserv., 141(3): 827–837. <>
59. STATSOFT. 2011. Statistica 10.
60. SZYMURA, T. H. 2012. How does recent vegetation reflects previous system of forest management? Pol. J. Ecol., 60(4): 859–862.
61. ŠMELKO, Š. 1975. Štúdium rastu a prírastku lesných stromov a porastov. Část 2. Záverečná zpráva. Zvolen: LF VŠLD.
62. ŠMELKO, Š. 1982. Biometrické zákonitosti rastu a prírastku lesných stromov a porastov. Bratislava: Príroda.
63. TASISSA, G. and BURKHART, H. E. 1997. Modeling thinning effects on ring width distribution in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda). Can. J. For. Res., 27(8): 1291–1301. <>
64. THOMSON, A. J. and BARCLAY, H. J. 1984. Effects of thinning and urea fertilization on the distribution of area increment along the boles of Douglas-fir at Shawnigan Lake, British Columbia. Can. J. For. Res., 14(6): 879–884. <>
65. ÚHÚL. 2008. Národní lesnický program pro obobí do roku 2013. Praha: ÚHÚL Brandýs nad Labem.
66. UTINEK, D. 2004. Převody pařezin na střední les v městských lesích Moravský Krumlov. (založení pokusných ploch). Brno: Mendelova zemědělská a lesnická univerzita v Brně.
67. UTINEK, D. 2006. Návrat ke středním lesům v městských lesích Moravský Krumlov. Lesn. Práce, 85(2): 11–13.
68. VALINGER, E. 1992. Effects of thinning and nitrogen fertilization on stem growth and stem form of Pinus sylvestris trees. Scand. J. For. Res., 7(1–4): 219–228. <>
69. VIEWEGH, J., KUSBACH, A. and MIKESKA, M. 2003. Czech forest ecosystem classification. J. For. Sci., 49(2): 85–93.
70. VYSKOT, M. 1958. Pěstění dubu. Praha: Státní zemědělské nakladatelství (SZN).
71. WARING, R. H. and PITMAN, G. B. 1985. Modifying lodgepole pine stands to change susceptibility to mountain pine beetle attack. Ecology, 66(3): 889–897. <>
72. WEINER, J. and THOMAS, S.C. 2001. The nature of tree growth and the “age-related decline in forest productivity”. Oikos, 94(2): 374–376. <>
73. WIKLUND, K., KONÖPKA, B. and NILSSON, L.-O. 1995. Stem form and growth in Picea abies (L.) karst, in response to water and mineral nutrient availability. Scand. J. For. Res., 10(4): 326–332. <>
74. WYKOFF, W. R. 1990. A Basal Area Increment Model for Individual Conifers in the Northern Rocky Mountains. For. Sci., 36(4): 1077–1104.
75. YANG, Y., HUANG, S., MENG, S. X., TRINCADO, G. and VANDERSCHAAF, C. L. 2009. A multilevel individual tree basal area increment model for aspen in boreal mixedwood stands. Can. J. For. Res., 39(11): 2203–2214. <>
76. YORK, R. A., FUCHS, D., BATTLES, J. J. and STEPHENS, S. L. 2010. Radial growth responses to gap creation in large, old Sequoiadendron giganteum. Appl. Veg. Sci., 13(4): 498–509. <>
77. ZUUR, A. F., IENO, E. N., WALKER, N. J. et al. 2009. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. New York: Springer.
front cover

ISSN 1211-8516 (Print)

ISSN 2464-8310 (Online)

Current issue

Review Management System NEW Indexed in DOAJ