Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2013, 61, 2769-2777

https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201361072769
Published online 2013-12-24

Assessment of municipal environmental protection expenditure: Case study in the Czech Republic

Jana Soukopová, Eduard Bakoš

Department of Public Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Masaryk University, Lipová 41a, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic

References

1. AFONSO, A., FERNANDES, S., 2008: Assessing and explaining the relative efficiency of local government. The Journal of Socio–Economics, 37, 5: 1946–1979. ISSN 1053-5357. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2007.03.007>
2. AFONSO, A., SCHUKNECHT, L., TANZI, V., 2010: Public sector efficiency: evidence for new EU member states and emerging markets. Appl Econ, 42, 17: 2147–2164. ISSN 0003-6846. <https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840701765460>
3. ALLEN, R., TOMMASI, D., ed., 2001: Managing public expenditure. A Reference Book for Transition Countries. [online] OECD. <http://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/pe/oecdpemhandbook.pdf>, [Accessed 15 Aug 2013].
4. ARIS, Automatized Budget Information System, 2013: [online] Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic, <http://wwwinfo.mfcr.cz/aris/> [Accessed 15 Aug 2013]. [In Czech].
5. BARDE, J. P., 1994: Economic instruments in environmental policy: Lessons from the OECD experience and their relevance to developing economies (No. 92). [online] OECD. <http://www.oecd.org/dev/1919252.pdf> [Accessed 15 Aug 2013].
6. BURGAT, P., JEANRENAUD, C., 2008: Technical efficiency and institutional variables. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, SJES: 130, IV: 709–717. ISSN 0303-9692.
7. BURNS, A., YOO, K. Y., 2002: Improving the efficiency and sustainability of public expenditure in the Czech Republic. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 328. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/085803311247.
8. CEPA, 2000: Classification of Environmental Protection Activities and Expenditure [online] <http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ramon/>.
9. DE BORGER, B., KERSTENS, K., 2000: What is known about municipal efficiency? The Belgian case and beyond. In: BLANK, J. (ed.) Public Provision and Performance: Contributions from Efficiency and Productivity Measurement. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 299–330. ISBN 0444504834.
10. DE CONINCK, S. et al., 2009: Mainstreaming Poverty-Environment Linkages into Development Planning: A Handbook for Practitioners, Nairobi: UNDP-UNEP Poverty-Environment Initiative.120. ISBN 978-92-807-2962-7.
11. EIG, 2010: Annual Report Results and Performance of the World Bank Group [online] <http://www.worldbank.org/ieg/rap2010/index.html> [Accessed 15 Aug 2013].
12. EMROUZNEJAD, A., PARKER, B. R., TAVARES, G., 2008: Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA, Socio Econ Plan Sci, 42, 3: 151–157. ISSN 0038-0121. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2007.07.002>
13. GONZÁLEZ, E. et al., 2011. Measuring quality of life in Spanish municipalities. Local Gov Stud, 37, 2: 171–197. ISSN 0300-3930. <https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2011.554826>
14. HANNON, B., 2001: Ecological pricing and economic efficiency. Ecol Econ, 36, 1: 19–30. ISSN 0921-8009. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00212-3>
15. JÍLKOVÁ, J. et al., 2010: Economic Valuation of Environmental Resources and its Use in Local Policy Decision–Making: A Comparative Czech–German Border Study. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 12, 3: 299–309. ISSN 1387-6988. <https://doi.org/10.1080/13876981003714610>
16. JOLLANDS, N., 2006: Concepts of efficiency in ecological economics: Sisyphus and the decision maker. Ecol Econ, 56, 3: 359–372. ISSN 0921-8009. <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.09.014>
17. LOIKKANEN, H. A., SUSILUOTO, I., 2005: Cost efficiency of Finnish municipalities in basic service provision 1994–2002. Urban Public Economics Review, 4, 39–64. ISSN 1697-6223.
18. MANDL, U., DIERX, A., ILZKOVITZ, F., 2008: The effectiveness and efficiency of public spending. European Economy-Economic Papers 301. [online] <http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/publication11902_en.pdf> [Accessed 15 Aug 2013].
19. MŽP, 2011: Metodika hodnocení efektivnosti výdajů na životní prostředí (Methodology of municipal environmental expenditures efficiency evaluation). [online] Věstník Ministerstva životního prostředí. XXI, 10-11: 2–27 <http://www.mzp.cz/osv/edice.nsf/10b74f708163f6cfc1256ae700728441/00791­cce67d94022c1257950003f4995/$FILE/ATTRRZ5S.pdf/Vestnik_10_11_2011.pdf> [Accessed 15 Aug 2013]. [In Czech].
20. OECD, 1997: Evaluating the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Economic Instruments in Environmental Policy. Paris: OECD Publishing. ISBN 9789264153608.
21. PESZKO, G., 2002: Good Practices of Public Environmental Expenditure Management in Transition Economies. [online] OECD Publishing <http://www.oecd.org/environment/outreach/2080960.pdf> [Accessed 15 Aug 2013>.
22. SOUKOPOVÁ, J. et al., 2010: Hodnocení efektivnosti výdajů obcí na životní prostředí, (Municipal environmental expenditures efficiency evaluation). [online] <http://amr.webnode.cz/metodika–hodnoceni–vydaju–obci/metodika–hodnoceni–efektivnosti–vydaju–obci–na–zp/Metodika_SP_4i1_54_08.pdf> [Accessed 15 Aug 2013]. [In Czech].
23. SOUKOPOVÁ, J., MALÝ, I., 2013: Competitive environment in waste management and its impact on municipal expenditures. Acta Univ. Agric. et Silvic. Mendel. Brun., 61, 4: 1113–1119. ISSN 1211-8516. <https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201361041113>
24. STRUK, M., SOUKOPOVÁ, J., 2011: Efficiency of the current municipal waste expenditure - methodology approach and its application. Acta Univ. Agric. et Silvic. Mendel. Brun., 59, 7: 379–386. ISSN 1211-8516. <https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201159070379>
25. ŠAUER, P., et al., 2009: Hodnocení efektivnosti implementace environmentálních politik (Assessment of Environmental Policies Implementation), Praha: CENIA, 159. ISBN 978-80-85087-80-2. [In Czech].
26. ŠAUER, P. et al., 2012: Assessment of Environmental Policy Implementation: Two Case Studies from the Czech Republic. Pol J Environ Stud, 21, 5: 1383–1391. ISSN 1230-1485.
27. ÚFIS, 2013: [online] Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic, <http://wwwinfo.mfcr.cz/ufis/> [Accessed 15 Aug 2013]. [In Czech].
28. WÄTZOLD, F., 2000: Efficiency and applicability of economic concepts dealing with environmental risk and ignorance. Ecol Econ, 33, 2: 299–311. ISSN 0921-8009. <https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00148-2>
front cover

ISSN 1211-8516 (Print)

ISSN 2464-8310 (Online)

Current issue

Review Management System NEW Indexed in DOAJ

Archive