Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 2020, 68(4), 669-678 | DOI: 10.11118/actaun202068040669
Comparison of Hydraulic Conductivity Values Obtained from Empirical Formulae and Laboratory Experiments
- 1 Institute of Water Structures, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Antonínská 548/1, 601 90 Brno, Czech Republic
- 2 Institute of Geotechnics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Antonínská 548/1, 601 90 Brno, Czech Republic
Hydraulic conductivity determination plays an essential role in the investigation of groundwater flow regime which can then influence many field problems such as pumping capabilities in the area, transport of contaminant or heat and soil internal erosion. Numerous equations based on dimensional analysis or experimental measurements have been published since the end of the 19th century for the determination of hydraulic conductivity. However, not all of these formulae are applicable for every material and all of them bring some uncertainty in the value of hydraulic conductivity. This paper contains a description of experimental research carried out concerning the determination of hydraulic conductivity for four types of sand with different grain size distribution curves and variable porosity. Obtained values of hydraulic conductivity ranged from 1 × 10-4 to 4 × 10-3 according to the sample porosity. The series of experiments consisted of 160 separate tests conducted in order to obtain relevant statistical sets. In this paper, the experimental data are discussed and compared with hydraulic conductivities obtained from 6 empirical formulae recommended in a previous study. The comparison showed that some empirical formulae provide a good agreement with the experimental data (the most precise were formulae published by Terzaghi and by Sauerbrey). However, some formulae showed high deviation from measured data (formula published by Zamarin).
Keywords: empirical formulae, hydraulic conductivity, porosity
Grants and funding:
This study was supported by the following projects: FAST-J-18-5328: The Problematics of external suffosion/heave (boiling) and FAST-J-20-6315 Determination of the uncertainties at selected hydraulic problems.
Received: October 20, 2018; Accepted: August 17, 2020; Published: August 30, 2020 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- CARRIER, W. D. 2003. Goodbye Hazen; Hello, Kozeny-Carman. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 129(11): 1054-1056. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:11(1054)
Go to original source...
- GHAFOORI, Y., MAČEK, M., VIDMAR, A., ŘÍHA, J. and KRY®ANOWSKI, A. 2020. Analysis of Seepage in a Laboratory Scaled Model using Passive Optical Fibre Distributed Temperature Sensor. Water, 12(2): 367. DOI: 10.3390/w12020367
Go to original source...
- HAZEN, A. 1892. Some physical properties of sand and gravel with special reference to their use in filtration. 24th Annual Report. Boston: Massachusetts State Board of Health.
- JULÍNEK, T., DUCHAN, D. and ŘÍHA, J. 2020. Mapping of uplift hazard due to rising groundwater level during floods. J. Flood Risk Management, special issue: e12601.
Go to original source...
- KASENOW, M. 2002. Determination of hydraulic conductivity from grain size analysis. Highland Ranch, CO: Water Resources Publications.
- KOZENY, J. 1927. About the capillary pipe of water in soil [in German: Über kapillare Leitung der Wasser in Boden]. Sitzungsber Akad. Wiss.,Wien, 136(2a): 271-306.
- KOZENY, J. 1953. The water in soil, motion ground water [in German: Das Wasser in Boden, Grundwasserbewegung]. In: Hydraulik. Springer-Verlag Vienna, pp. 380-445.
Go to original source...
- KRÜGER, E. 1918. The motion of ground water [in German: Die Grundwasserbewegung]. Internat. Mitt. Bodenkunde, 8(5/6): 105-122.
- PETRULA, L., ŘÍHA, J. and JULÍNEK, T. 2018. Evaluation of groundwater contamination in former military airport area. Gradevinar, 70(4): 369-375.
- ŘÍHA, J., PETRULA, L., HALA, M. and ALHASAN, Z. 2018. Assessment of empirical formulae for determining the hydraulic conductivity of glass beads. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 66(3): 337-347. DOI: 10.2478/johh-2018-0021
Go to original source...
- SAUERBREY, I. I. 1932. On the Problem and Determination of the Permeability Coefficient [in Russian: К вопросу о коэффициенте фильтрации грунтов и методике его исследования, Известия]. In: Proceedings VNIIG. No. 3-5, pp. 115-145 and 173-206.
- SLICHTER, C.S. 1899. Theoretical investigation of the motion of ground waters. U.S. Geological Survey 19th Annual Report, Part 2. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.
- TERZAGHI, C. 1925. Principles of Soil Mechanics. Engineering News Record, 95(19): 832-836.
- VNIIG. 1991. Recommendations on the laboratory methods of investigation of the permeability and filtration stability of soils. [in Russian: Рекомендации по методике лабораторных испытаний грунтов на водопроницаемость и суффозионную устойчивостьс]. P 49-90/VNIIG. Leningrad: VNIIG.
- VUKOVIĆ, M. and SORO, A. 1992. Determination of hydraulic conductivity of porous media from grain - size composition. Littleton, CO: Water Resources Publications.
- ZAMARIN, E. A. 1928. The calculus of the groundwater flow [in Russian: Расчет движения грунтовых вод]. Izd-vo. Tashkent: IVCH.
- ZUNKER, F. 1932. Fertilization and soil science [in German: Düngung und Bodenkunde], Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde, A25, pages.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.